1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Fire Tomlin ?

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by djac111, Dec 10, 2018.

  1. Disco1981

    Disco1981 Well-Known Member

    5,508
    1,764
    Mar 20, 2017
    Fact is...We squeaked out a win in a game we were dominating...We dominated the last 3 weeks and LOST...Granted Boz attributed to that big time...But Tomlin is just as guilty, moreso...He's the head guy...Making the same coaching blunders..

    They'll never get rid of Tomlin...Until Tomlin calls it quits...Which I think is wrong, Because he has cost us so many games...But that non-losing record though
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. BURGH43STEL

    BURGH43STEL Well-Known Member

    2,656
    406
    Oct 23, 2011
    Not you per say but I don't think some people understand that football is a team sport. Especially when someone says a coach has a franchise/HOF QB he should be expected to win. Even with a HOF/franchise QB it's not easy to win a Superbowl. Several HOF QB's never won a SB. Some HOF QB's only one won. There are QB's playing today that are better than Ben that only won one SB.

    The league was a much different place today then in the Cowher era. Cowher was a good coach even though some people complained about him endlessly and believed he would never win a SB.

    A lot of QB's are going to be franchises QB's under the current rules and structure of the league.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    5,353
    1,223
    Sep 9, 2013
    I mean we finally beat NE... still work to do to make the playoffs. I still say we fire him if we miss. It will depend on the rest of the season tho.

    We have the team to go all the way. If we squeak into the playoffs, then make it to the AFC Championship game or the Super Bowl theres no way we can fire him. No chance. However if we miss or luck into the playoffs and get embarrassed... we may see a different picture
     
  4. lewisha

    lewisha Well-Known Member

    2,176
    350
    Dec 27, 2012
    I think
    Stating that 2 of the last 20 something Super Bowls were won bye a back-up QBs should end all discussion? I was talking about Flacco and Foles when I said 15 of the last 17, didn’t wanna go as far back as Hofstetler, lol. But I get it, after Tomlin screwed the pooch and lost 2 of the last 3 games he should have won, all,the Tomlin backers wanna brigade now that they have something to hang their hat on. You have your opinion, I have mine. I personally think Tomlin is a C+ coach, with an A+ offense, with a C+ defense, and a grade F special teams. I also stated If he wins another Super Bowl before Ben retires, he gets a 5 year pass from me no matter what his record is after that.
     
  5. lewisha

    lewisha Well-Known Member

    2,176
    350
    Dec 27, 2012
    Roger that. Thought you were calling me out, lol. I apologize, and agree with you in parts. Just got a little heated with people pulling this post up after the win, instead of enjoying it. I know some people like Tomlin a lot more than me, but I understand he is better than 60% of the coaches out there, but the expectations around here are high. It is after all the greatest sports franchise ever.
     
  6. SteelerGlenn

    SteelerGlenn

    20,083
    4,363
    Nov 24, 2011
    Where are you getting that he's lost 19 challenges in a row?
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  7. groutbrook

    groutbrook

    7,939
    1,707
    Oct 23, 2016
    Not to get in the way of a good narrative, But I think Today was Tomlin's 10th consecutive losing challenge, not his 19th.

    https://www.boston.com/sports/new-england-patriots/2018/12/16/steelers-patriots-punt-challenge

    "The ruling on the field was subsequently upheld, and Tomlin lost a timeout — and his 10th straight challenge. The 46-year-old has not won a challenge in over two years."
     
  8. BURGH43STEL

    BURGH43STEL Well-Known Member

    2,656
    406
    Oct 23, 2011
    Well when we actually break down why the team loss then it's easier to understand. The losses were not 100% on the coaches.

    Yeah I support Tomlin because he is the coach of the team. I will back him until I believe he isn't a good coach. He's proven to be a very good coach.

    Again, I don't know how a C+ coach helps a team win a SB, play in another, never have a losing season, win 123 games for a .657 win % ect. I'd agree with you if you were talking about Marvin Lewis. Tomlin's teams have been as good or better than most teams during his time period. Only BB has clearly better. I just don't understand some people's thought processes.

    Peyton and Caroll must be C coaches in your book too right? Tomlin is as good as those guys when it comes to winning games. My opinion is that they are all better than C's.
     
  9. KnoxVegasSteel

    KnoxVegasSteel Well-Known Member

    6,044
    1,623
    Oct 21, 2011
    Crawl back in your hole.
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  10. OX1947

    OX1947 Well-Known Member

    3,198
    610
    Jan 12, 2017
    You can't prove wrong in an opinion.
     
  11. lewisha

    lewisha Well-Known Member

    2,176
    350
    Dec 27, 2012
    I really don’t follow the Saints or Seahawks that close. I would have to look at their W-L record against the spread and teams they were favored against. Carroll May go down a grade just for that boneheaded play call in the Super Bowl against the Cheatriots, though. :lolol:
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    41,596
    9,001
    Oct 16, 2011
    Congrats to Tomlin, got the monkey off his back finally, although he would have last season if not for a stupid rule.

    Still doesn't absolve him of his shortcomings, IMO.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  13. BURGH43STEL

    BURGH43STEL Well-Known Member

    2,656
    406
    Oct 23, 2011
    Facts generally override opinions.
     
  14. BURGH43STEL

    BURGH43STEL Well-Known Member

    2,656
    406
    Oct 23, 2011
    Who is perfect? What coach doesn't have shortcomings?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. SteelerGlenn

    SteelerGlenn

    20,083
    4,363
    Nov 24, 2011
    Exactly. He's been throwing that around in a couple threads. A quick google search proves he's full of ****.
    https://www.pro-football-reference.com/coaches/TomlMi0.htm
     
  16. bobby

    bobby Well-Known Member

    1,036
    95
    Nov 29, 2015
    I still stay with better coaching this team atleast 10-3-1
     
  17. BURGH43STEL

    BURGH43STEL Well-Known Member

    2,656
    406
    Oct 23, 2011
    I don't follow the spreads. That's for gamblers. Every team in the league has the talent to beat your team.
     
  18. BURGH43STEL

    BURGH43STEL Well-Known Member

    2,656
    406
    Oct 23, 2011
    With less turnovers or a better FG kicker the team could have more wins.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  19. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    41,596
    9,001
    Oct 16, 2011
    I've been on both sides of the argument, Burgh. I'm openminded enough to see that his abysmal record against teams like the Raiders is very detrimental to this teams chances of reaching the SB. It's been going on for years.
     
  20. bobby

    bobby Well-Known Member

    1,036
    95
    Nov 29, 2015
    wow looking at this chart really shows how the team between 2012 and 2013 went off and the def suffered
     
  21. lewisha

    lewisha Well-Known Member

    2,176
    350
    Dec 27, 2012
    True, any given Sunday and all that, but there’s a reason for spreads, and why sportsbooks make money and not lose it over the long haul. And losing to a 14 point dog says something. I don’t know if the approach is “well, they suck, so let’s start putting in the New England game plan to have extra time to prepare for the Cheatriots, we can use that to beat the Raiders” or what. If that is the thinking, it plays right into logic of any given Sunday, and bites this team right in the butt.
     
  22. MeanJoeBlue

    MeanJoeBlue Well-Known Member

    1,239
    452
    Jan 2, 2013
    Agreed.
    I think about the Chargers. They've had Brees and Rivers as QB since 2002. Most years, the pundits talk about how much talent is on that team. In 2006 they were the best team in the league (regular season), and 2nd best in 2009... They've never made the Super Bowl. Playoffs 6 times, compared to 11 times by the Steelers in the same amount of time. (Maybe this is the year it is different?)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  23. BURGH43STEL

    BURGH43STEL Well-Known Member

    2,656
    406
    Oct 23, 2011
    I suppose if you witness something enough then you would realize that it's the norm for the league. Every team has the talent to beat your team. The league is designed that way. Teams that don't play well enough can get beaten by any team regardless of record, rankings, ect. It's been proven over and over again. It's not just been the Steelers on the losing end of bad losses.

    Maybe the record isn't as abysmal as you believe? The Steelers haven't been far and away better than the competition that they faced. How do we measure that anyway? It basically boils down to how a team performs on game day.

    I don't like to place all my focus on the negatives. Focusing on the negatives would cloud my judgement and make my experience of the Steelers terrible win or lose.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  24. BURGH43STEL

    BURGH43STEL Well-Known Member

    2,656
    406
    Oct 23, 2011
    There are a lot of QB's better than Eli that never won a SB. He helped his team win two.
     
  25. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    41,596
    9,001
    Oct 16, 2011
    You're barking up the wrong tree. I've heard all the arguments, hell I've made some of them.

    This team has a real problem beating bad teams. Fans can either accept it or choose to ignore it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!