1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Kevin Colbert Interview Transcript 7/26

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by TerribleTowelFlying, Jul 26, 2012.

  1. TerribleTowelFlying

    TerribleTowelFlying Staff Member Site Admin Mod Team

    23,299
    2,332
    Oct 12, 2011
    Kevin Colbert sat down with some local reporters today and as you can guess, it was all about Mike Wallace's contract talks. it can be viewed at http://pit.scout.com
    Here's is the transcript:

    Q: What’s the procedure now with Mike Wallace? And did you get close?

    Colbert: Every negotiation is unique. You go through it and you try to put your best foot forward and hope you can come to an agreement. It takes two parties to reach that agreement and obviously we’re not at that stage, and we’ve chosen to not progress with negotiations at this point.

    Q: What if he says ‘OK, I’ll take your last offer’?

    Colbert: I think once we made that decision we’re in a different mode and we would have to address any new negotiation if we get to that point.

    Q: You guys did not drop the tender amount, as you could have. You’re apparently trying to keep this courteous and keep the dialogue going. Are you still hopeful of a long-term deal?

    Colbert: Yeah. Back to the point about dropping the tender, we never really wanted to do that because Mike’s a good player who’s worthy of the tender we put on him a long time ago. We never planned on using the tender or reducing the tender as leverage. I think that just shows what you think about the player and it gives you a launching point for a long-term deal. But again we weren’t able to conclude that so we move on.

    Q: Are you still hopeful? Or has the optimism waned?

    Colbert: I think it is what it is right now with him not being here. Really, we’ve got to focus on what we can control, and we can’t control that because again every negotiation’s unique. You put your best foot forward. If it’s not suitable for both parties than you have to adjust. We’re really in a just-move-forward mode right now.

    Q: Haven’t you been consistent in your negotiating policy over the years?

    Colbert: Yeah. That’s been the Steeler policy forever. To my knowledge this is the first time we’ve had a restricted player hold out. In the past it was usually a player who was under contract was holding out. There have been draft picks without contracts that have held out.

    Q: But that’s different, right?

    Colbert: Yes, this is unique because it’s a restricted free agent that has a tender that can be signed and you can still negotiate off of that. It’s different for franchise players. They had a drop-dead date of July 15. You can’t extend off of that, but for a restricted player you can.

    Q: Since he’s not under contract, is he subject to fines?

    Colbert: Nope.

    Q: Have you spoken to Mike recently?

    Colbert: No. Omar [Khan] talked more with his agent and then I talk both to the agent and to the player directly.

    Q: Any indication that he might just come in at any time?

    Colbert: No. That was obviously a few days ago. Again, I don’t want to get into a lot of specifics about the negotiations because we don’t do that as a rule, but at that point he didn’t indicate to us what his next course of action was to be, other than we weren’t going to have an agreement.

    Q: The whole ball’s in his court then, right?

    Colbert: Yeah. Again, we have to move on. We have to prepare with the 89 guys that are here. We have to. You can’t focus on who isn’t here because you lose track of what you’re supposed to be doing.

    Q: If he does show up, does that mean he has to sign the tender at least?

    Colbert: Yeah, he has to be under contract to practice.

    Q: Is there any drop-dead date to sign the tender?

    Colbert: You don’t want to project into the future too much on that. [Editor’s note: Players need to be active for 6 games for an accrued season.]

    Q: His performance slipped in the second half last season. Do you factor that into the negotiations?

    Colbert: No. Again, in any negotiation you look at the whole body of work and see where they are. Players have up-and-down seasons; they have up-and-down periods during the season. You look at the whole body of work and just try to come to a conclusion of what you think a player’s worth and then you try to come to an agreement with him.

    Q: Other than Hines Ward, I can’t remember another wide receiver getting a big-time second contract. Is there a philosophy that that position is maybe not as important as others?

    Colbert: No, not at all. We don’t really look at it positionally, except quarterbacks are always treated differently. No. It’s about the individual player.

    Q: Are you interested in bringing anybody in?

    Colbert: We’ll always look at what’s available and what kind of cap room we have to maneuver and work with, so that’s ongoing. There are players that didn’t sign; there are players that will get flushed out. We have to balance. We have six guys on PUP and one guy not here, so really we’re working with 83 guys, so we have to keep balance positionally so we have enough guys working and we don’t overuse the particular position.
     
  2. diehardsteel

    diehardsteel Well-Known Member

    1,049
    0
    Oct 19, 2011
    Hmmmmm, that wasn't a very optimistic interview at all. Thanks for posting TTF.
     
  3. HinesWardHOF

    HinesWardHOF Well-Known Member

    2,075
    0
    Oct 24, 2011


    it seemed upbeat most of the last few months but now it seems like if they get him we get him... if not we move on.. the mood seems to have changed... thanks for posting... interesting read.. HINES
     
  4. mstng1863

    mstng1863 Well-Known Member

    639
    5
    Oct 17, 2011
    I am wondering about the comment: "Editor’s note: Players need to be active for 6 games for an accrued season.]"....

    Does that mean if he signs his tender in Week 10 and comes to play the last six games, but the Steelers de-activate him those games he doesn't get an "accrused season"? I hope so! Thoughts???
     
  5. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,665
    10,211
    Oct 16, 2011
    I wanted Mike on the team this year but I'm getting tired of his b.s., does he think he is going to handcuff the Steelers into a giving him a contract they don't want to? It makes me think they must be far apart and that Wallace knows he won't get the number he wants if he signs his tender. News flash Mikey, you're not going to get it this way either. Sign your tender, get you'r butt to camp and help your teammates and then go make your dough next year (assuming a long term deal isn't reached after signing).
     
  6. CANTON STEEL

    CANTON STEEL Well-Known Member

    1,287
    3
    Oct 17, 2011
    Wow. Thanks TTF. It sure sounds like the Steelers are done with Wallace at this point. They laid out their cards and basically told him it's either sign your tender or that's it. It doesn't even look like they are interested in budging if he decides to come back at them in the next couple days and agree to their last offer. It's sign the tender or nothing.

    You know what.......good for the Steelers. If other teams were to stand up against ridiculous contracts like the Steelers do then the NFL wouldn't be in this mess of players constantly wanting more and more millions. Once one teams caves they all seem to and a trend begins. NOT UP IN HERE! :threaten:
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!