David Paulson

They keep 5 or 6 WR's, 3 TE's.

 

I was hoping someone would get that :-D

 

Alienux...we got 2 rules about Message Board.

Rule #1...We don't talk about Message Board.

Rule #2...We don't talk about BA !!!

:o

 

Practice squad player and needs to gain 10 lbs of muscle.

 

Another thing to consider is how is Chris Rainey accounted for on this team since he is not a traditional RB, he is a hybrid all purpose guy....

 

Another thing to consider is how is Chris Rainey accounted for on this team since he is not a traditional RB, he is a hybrid all purpose guy....[/quote:cugjtto0]

He'll be an RB...that can play multiple roles...just like D. Sproles. And I see him being one of the 4 (excluding Mendy) that they keep.

 

He will be the athlete position. when suanders is back Johnson paulson or pope are gone

 

Paulsen plays to soft IMO.....has a hard time getting separation and soft....bad combo for a TE IMO


HACK

 

He has very good hands and I love the fact that after he scores he just tosses the ball to the official.

 

I just took a couple min to watch the video someone posted...seems like he has decent hands...also i find it funny toward the beginning it showed Burfict getting a personal foul for hit out of bounds...such a bonehead who ended up undrafted...i wish him the best but i find it funny.

 

He'll be an RB...that can play multiple roles...just like D. Sproles. And I see him being one of the 4 (excluding Mendy) that they keep.[/quote:3svc4dow]

Yeah he is a RB, but they may think he is so much of a passing threat and also a return threat that they only go in with 5 WR's instead of six, and therefore keep one more RB than usual as well....

 

Well let me say this, Johnson out, Paulson in. They can get a FB cheap, like Owen Schmitt who is out their.

They won't cut Saunders and Pope is a Haley produce so he isn't going anywhere. Miller, Pope, Paulson.

Is much better then Miller, Pope, Johnson. Of the four TE's Johnson is the worst of the crop!

 

He'll be an RB...that can play multiple roles...just like D. Sproles. And I see him being one of the 4 (excluding Mendy) that they keep.[/quote:yk05ac2d]

Yeah he is a RB, but they may think he is so much of a passing threat and also a return threat that they only go in with 5 WR's instead of six, and therefore keep one more RB than usual as well....[/quote:yk05ac2d]

I'm sort of leaning towards this idea myself.

 

that's what i'm saying about wes lyons and will johnson, both were WR's. now listed as FB and TE. worst case scenario, one of them plays the 5th WR in certain sets and we keep a couple of these other wideouts on the PS if needed down the road. the 5th WR doesn't see alot of balls come his way. either of those two could fit two positions. so they are really not without a 5th WR. they also have rainey that is capable of going out as a WR. so they lose nothing.