1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Here you go

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by steel1031, Dec 27, 2017.

  1. steel1031

    steel1031 Well-Known Member

    3,825
    239
    Oct 16, 2011
  2. strummerfan

    strummerfan Well-Known Member

    18,066
    3,646
    May 9, 2012
    • Agree Agree x 6
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. dd63

    dd63 Well-Known Member

    515
    140
    Jun 18, 2017
  4. We need a change

    We need a change Well-Known Member

    1,499
    257
    Oct 9, 2017
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. dd63

    dd63 Well-Known Member

    515
    140
    Jun 18, 2017

    Yup. For better or worse he was not part of the team, and last time I checked teams win Superbowls, not individuals.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. turtle

    turtle

    8,542
    1,375
    Jan 14, 2015
    These new videos etc are really changing my opinion of the whole thing. Steelers made the right move, that behavior can't be good for anyone.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  7. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    25,782
    4,237
    Dec 18, 2016
    Funny thing is all this is changing my opinion in the opposite direction. All this makes me think they should have refused to grant his wish and buried him on the inactive list the rest of the way.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  8. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    I understand and can even appreciate his frustration. He wasn't playing when he thought he could still be productive. He asked for his release numerous times and the Steelers made a business decision by not releasing him. At that point, he acted like a child and forced their hand.

    What he did wasn't business, it was pathetic. Signing with the Pats was a business decision and I actually don't care one bit about that, but the stuff he did throughout the season is inexcusable. It's not part of football nor is it part of business. If you want to be a man on Sundays, then act like a man the rest of the week.

    The Steelers gave JH every opportunity in the world and he made a name for himself that will live on forever. But he has destroyed a small part of that with his behaviour this year, and that's just sad.

    I find it ironic he won't allow his kids to be given a participation trophy because he wants them to earn everything they get, but when something doesn't go his way, he acts like a child and throws a tantrum
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  9. turtle

    turtle

    8,542
    1,375
    Jan 14, 2015
    Would have just created more tension imo. Steelers once again take the high road.
     
  10. steel1031

    steel1031 Well-Known Member

    3,825
    239
    Oct 16, 2011
    Once again tomlin colbert and rooneys do the right thing and keep quiet about it. Even though people were calling for their jobs. When will we learn?lol
     
  11. strummerfan

    strummerfan Well-Known Member

    18,066
    3,646
    May 9, 2012

    Would have left us thin somewhere else. Inevitably he would have become even more of a distraction.
     
  12. BadwordLebeau

    BadwordLebeau Well-Known Member

    116
    14
    Dec 26, 2016
    in terms of business decisions, long term ones are usually better than short term ones.

    I stand by what I wrote in the other thread that time heals all wounds, but I will also admit that the Steeler fan base is a finicky one. If more and more negativity comes out about his actions this entire year and he plays an active on-field role in beating the Steelers in the AFCCG then things might play out differently for him.

    He might get his 59k and a ring. But ask the Steeler Legends how their long term business worked out for them over the decades. I guarantee you Mel Blount (one example) has cashed more than $59k in checks since he retired just by playing the role and maintaining association with the Steeler organization.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!