1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

If you had gotten your way...

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by blountforcetrauma, Nov 12, 2015.

  1. JAD

    JAD Well-Known Member

    3,386
    375
    Jan 2, 2012

    Okay, one thing I totally 100 per cent disagree with above. Javis Jones contributes as much or more than Eifiert.! You are kidding right. And you don't have to go into your long 5 paragraph answered to this, because I know what I see and on this i cannot be convinced.
     
  2. PWP

    PWP Well-Known Member

    5,928
    464
    Oct 26, 2011
    I wanted this Team to draft Taylor Mays ...He has never really turned the corner , but he is still hanging around the NFL .... Also another kid was Brian Quick he was looking real good and is now just a healthy scratch.I am not sure what is going on with that....
     
  3. NY STEELERFAN

    NY STEELERFAN Well-Known Member

    8,604
    1,333
    Dec 10, 2012

    I don't know about that more like if we had Boswell instead of scbooie doobie do we would be 8-1......
     
  4. Diamond

    Diamond Well-Known Member

    5,790
    469
    May 26, 2012

    Mays has a total of 76 tackles and zero interceptions in six years, and only 9 tackles this year in 8 games once again with zero picks, all I can say is i'm glad we didnt draft him, he's the most under performing player in the NFL and like the bengals coach lewis said about him before he cut him "He is always out of position on plays"
     
  5. PWP

    PWP Well-Known Member

    5,928
    464
    Oct 26, 2011
    Yep me to I am very glad we didn't draft him as well, but I was all about drafting him. After watching him play and watching Shamarko play they are both very similar . Neither of them can grasp the position from the neck up and both have plenty of physical tools ....

    The Team needs to invest in that simulator they are using for QB'S and take that to the Combine to test the DB'S ...We need guys who can recognize and dissect plays not guys always out of position.....
     
  6. YinzerBuckeye

    YinzerBuckeye Well-Known Member

    469
    99
    Aug 20, 2015
    I really wanted Gabe Carimi in 2011. He's now unemployed.

    I was shocked when Cam dropped to our pick.
     
  7. HugeSnack

    HugeSnack Well-Known Member

    5,243
    103
    Oct 17, 2011
    I didn't say Jarvis offers more for us than Eifert offers the Bengals. I said Jarvis offers as much or more for us than Eifert would if he'd been drafted by the Steelers instead... Because he'd be squarely behind Heath and battling Spaeth for playing time. The absolute soonest he'd take over for Heath would be his 4th year, and probably not even then. It was just too soon to draft a tight end.
     
  8. JAD

    JAD Well-Known Member

    3,386
    375
    Jan 2, 2012
    t

    Okay, I'll accept that, but I think a good coach would have found a way to play 2 tight end sets with Heath and Eifert. Can you of imagined how tough that would of be to defend. Passing downs would be Brown, Bryant, Heath and Eifert. Wheaton?
     
  9. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    32,198
    7,866
    Nov 14, 2011
    I wanted them to draft Justin Gilbert last season, good thing the Browns drafted him instead he's a major bust. But I was all for them drafting Bell in the second round.
     
  10. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,334
    9,646
    Oct 16, 2011
    He would have made Spaeth expendable. Hell, Spaeth is hurt all the time anyway, taking Eifert would have been a fine pick. Have to disagree with Snack.
     
  11. HugeSnack

    HugeSnack Well-Known Member

    5,243
    103
    Oct 17, 2011
    I completely agree. But we're not talking about a theoretical good coach, we're talking about the ones the Steelers have. These are the guys that wanted to continue starting Michael Vick, even if it meant averaging 1 passing yard per quarter. They wouldn't have changed systems, and they have NO problem sitting young, superior talent on the bench.
     
  12. HugeSnack

    HugeSnack Well-Known Member

    5,243
    103
    Oct 17, 2011
    Spaeth isn't out there to catch TDs, he's out there to run block. In that sense, Eifert doesn't hold a candle to Spaeth.

    Eifert would be competing with Miller first, and the receivers second. And we have some great receivers, and the system favors them, not the #2 TE.
     
  13. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,334
    9,646
    Oct 16, 2011
    Eifert is a good blocker too, hes a complete TE, doesnt matter if Spaeth is a better blocker, Id gladly sacrifice him for Eifert, whom would then step in to the #1 roll when Heath leaves.
     
  14. SteelerJJ

    SteelerJJ Well-Known Member

    8,400
    488
    Oct 16, 2011
    Just as bad that we had Len Dawson and Johnny Unitas and released both of them.
     
  15. thorn058

    thorn058 Well-Known Member

    16,488
    4,333
    Oct 19, 2011
    Wasn't Pope here the year Eifert was drafted and Spaeth was signed the following year? That would be a tough line up to crack considering how much Haley pushed Pope onto the field.
     
  16. HugeSnack

    HugeSnack Well-Known Member

    5,243
    103
    Oct 17, 2011
    I know you'd make that sacrifice, and so would a ton of other people. I'd be all about a 2 TE system with the right guys. But I really think the team wouldn't be willing to change that much. I, for one, am thankful they at least were aware of that and didn't use a draft pick on a guy they'd later refuse to play, like Dri Archer or Brandon Boykin.
     
  17. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    I'm still scratching my head over Boykin dude.
     
  18. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,334
    9,646
    Oct 16, 2011
    Well we'll never know if they would have or not but what we do know is theyd have a damn good talent ready to take over for Heath. With how little impact JJ has made, would the value be any different production wise? Nope, but at least the TE position would be set for the foreseeable future.

    Maybe JJ turns into something, hopefully he does.
     
  19. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    7,498
    1,734
    Sep 9, 2013
    It's easy to play the what if game. In all honesty tho if we pick Eifert, it changes the entire rest of the draft for us. Maybe we force pass rusher because of a perceived need in round 2 and miss out on Bell. Or do so the next year and miss Shazier, Tuitt, or Bryant.

    You'll never know what would have happened if we took Eifert. I really like him as a player, and actually thought that is who we were going to take... But we almost certainly would have picked other players in the other rounds had we gone Eifert instead of JJ.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. HugeSnack

    HugeSnack Well-Known Member

    5,243
    103
    Oct 17, 2011
    It's not too late to have the TE position set for the foreseeable future. Heath ain't done yet. Jesse James might turn out to be the successor. If he's not, we still have a year or two to get a guy. I don't think it's the type of position that needs years of grooming, if you pick one high. In my opinion it's not ideal to have an overlap from mentor to protege the length of a whole rookie contract. If we're going to draft a stud TE in round 1, I'd rather do it the year we need him, or one year before, and use all the picks prior elsewhere. Otherwise it's like drafting a 27 year old and having to pay him a crapload right out of the gate.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  21. GB_Steel

    GB_Steel Well-Known Member

    2,131
    117
    Oct 20, 2011
    Yeah Mays is another guy that I really liked coming out and am glad now that we didn't draft him. Hard to find that combination of size and athletic ability.

    Jarvis Moss is another. Was supposed to be the next Jevon Kearse but never panned out.
     
  22. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,334
    9,646
    Oct 16, 2011
    Ok, lets simplify this, who would you guys rather have at this point, JJ or Eifert?

    I know who Id rather have. Now if JJ ever goes on to realize the potential that some of us felt he had, it would change things but at the moment, its a no brainer for me.

    And SG, the only player that would make a huge difference if we took or not would be Bell in that draft. But if you are going to add all those variable into these type of discussions then why bother having them.

    Edit* Wanted to make clear that in no way am I saying Id want Eifert over Bell, just that the rest of the picks in that draft could be changed with no ill effects and probably would even benefit us if they had a do over. I dont think future drafts would change at all, they still went LB in the next draft anyway.
     
    Last edited: Nov 16, 2015
  23. JAD

    JAD Well-Known Member

    3,386
    375
    Jan 2, 2012
    I know who I'd rather have. Also don't think JJ ever goes on to realize his potential, because I don't think he can, but will give him the remaining 6 games because he is a no. 1 pick. Now Shazier and Dupree that's a different story as you can see their potential.
     
  24. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,334
    9,646
    Oct 16, 2011
    He's not effective at reaching the QB, I was expecting more production in that regard by this point, I've been very lenient in giving him the benefit of doubt.

    I'd have to look deeper to see how effective the rest of his game is though. However they brought this guy in to get to the QB and he's not getting it done there.
     
  25. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    He really got some great penetration a few times yesterday and really bull rushed well. He also is good at recovering fumbles. I still don't foresee him going down as one of our greats when it's all said and done. If I'm being totally honest, that's my position.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!