1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Archer to play WR

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Blast Furnace, May 19, 2014.

  1. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,663
    10,210
    Oct 16, 2011
  2. HinesWardHOF

    HinesWardHOF Well-Known Member

    2,075
    0
    Oct 24, 2011
  3. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,663
    10,210
    Oct 16, 2011
    He'll be used in the slot, hes a threat to take any 5 to 10 yard pass to the house. He wont be used for anything longer, his numbers drop dramatically after 10 yards.
     
  4. TheSteelHurtin2188

    TheSteelHurtin2188 Well-Known Member

    5,380
    261
    Nov 30, 2011
    yeah Ben is going to hate throwing to a WR that is fast as lightning.
     
  5. Iowasteeljim

    Iowasteeljim

    2,524
    492
    Oct 26, 2011
    I guess I kind of thought Ben tried to throw to the guy that was open...am I missing something?
     
  6. Chainmover1

    Chainmover1 Well-Known Member

    417
    33
    Jan 3, 2014
    Didn't think they would draft a RB rd3 in the draft. Some also expected a CB or a WR. After the draft I looked up his profile and posted something like Hey! we were all right on the position drafted in rd3 it seems. In his profile he is listed as a WR but also a RB/CB/KR.:smiley1:

    Position: [FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif]WR[/FONT] [FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif]Pos2:[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif] RB/CB/KR[/FONT] [FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif] Class/Draft Year:[/FONT] [FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif]rSr/2014[/FONT][/FONT]
    [FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif]40 Low:[/FONT] [FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif]4.16[/FONT] [FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif]40 Time:[/FONT] [FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif]4.16[/FONT] [FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif]40 High:[/FONT] [FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif]4.37[/FONT]
    Projected Round: 3 High: Late 2nd/RB-KRorSlot Low: 5th Stock: [​IMG]

    Rated number 17 out of 325 WR's 100 / 2254 TOTAL

    Also it seems this pick, like some think now, could be huge. From nfldraftscout.com reports.

    Like Thomas, Archer spent most of his career at running back with the Golden Arches but scouts are split as to where he'll wind up in the NFL. He was invited to the Combine as a running back but given his slight frame and soft hands, it isn't difficult to imagine him ultimately making the conversion to slot receiver, a position he played with increasing frequency as his record-breaking career at Kent State came to a close.



     
  7. Ray D

    Ray D Staff Member Mod Team

    11,074
    2,305
    Oct 18, 2011
    His size worries me. I'd be lying if I said otherwise. He does seem very strong for his size. I'm more concerned for his durability. Perhaps he can add 10-20 lb.s and it wouldn't slow him down much if at all provided it was muscle.

    That said, he appears to have a ton of talent. I can't wait to see him running in space.
     
  8. SteelCity_NB

    SteelCity_NB Staff Member Mod Team

    5,418
    684
    Oct 23, 2011
    Soooo, Brown, Wheaton, Moore, Bryant & Archer? Will we even keep a 6th WR? Are both DHB and Moye on the outs?
     
  9. Busman

    Busman

    7,853
    1,091
    Oct 18, 2011
    Wasn't Willie Parker vertically challenged?

    Bman
     
  10. SteelCity_NB

    SteelCity_NB Staff Member Mod Team

    5,418
    684
    Oct 23, 2011
    Nah, Willie was 5'10. I don't think his size was ever an issue.
     
  11. Thigpen82

    Thigpen82 Bitter optimist

    10,527
    1,534
    Oct 17, 2011
  12. CANTON STEEL

    CANTON STEEL Well-Known Member

    1,287
    3
    Oct 17, 2011
    Of course you do.....
     
  13. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    30,205
    6,294
    Oct 22, 2011
    this kid will line up everywhere and they better cover him because he will burn them quickly if not. go ahead and put a safety on him. the kid lifted 225 more times than mike adams did. he's one muscle. he'll be fine. I fully expect DHB to make this team too. ben threw more 20+ and 40+ balls last year then ever before. weapons everywhere.:cool:
     
  14. TheSteelHurtin2188

    TheSteelHurtin2188 Well-Known Member

    5,380
    261
    Nov 30, 2011
    I love our group of WRs. There are so many different options they can throw out there.
     
  15. Busman

    Busman

    7,853
    1,091
    Oct 18, 2011
    ARE was not a giant hehe.. Think I remember seeing 5'7 when I looked it up through google.

    Bman
     
  16. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    30,205
    6,294
    Oct 22, 2011
    I just think he will be on the field more as a wr than as a rb with bell in the game, hence the change. it doesn't mean he can't line up in the backfield if they decide to run him on certain plays. wildcat formations could be interesting too. I agree hurtin, we have options and defenses will be hard pressed to have the right people on the field in the right spots to cover it all. let's not forget covering that speed all day and having to make tackles on our RB's with size all day will wear on a defense. I just hope the coaches can bring it all together early.:cool:
     
  17. TerribleTowelFlying

    TerribleTowelFlying Staff Member Site Admin Mod Team

    23,297
    2,332
    Oct 12, 2011
    Personally, I doubt it's his permanent number, and for his sake, I hope not. How many WR's are going to make the roster?
     
  18. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    30,205
    6,294
    Oct 22, 2011
    AB is not a giant and he's done pretty well I'd say.:cool:
     
  19. gpguy

    gpguy Well-Known Member

    3,481
    21
    Dec 19, 2011
    I do not see the number changing meaning anything. We all already knew he was going to lineup everywhere and be a returner/etc. Maybe they just envision him more out wide than in the backfield so they changed it.

    And also (at this point) I do not see where this change anything as far as how many WRs/RBs/etc are kept. You can still keep Bell/Blount and Brown/Wheaton/Moore/Bryant/DHB and Archer. Now say if they bring LSH back or something...then yes that could impact it some...but we'll see.
     
  20. Busman

    Busman

    7,853
    1,091
    Oct 18, 2011
    Yup I would agree 100% . Loved his style of play.. For a small guy he sure was not afraid to take a hit

    Bman
     
  21. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,663
    10,210
    Oct 16, 2011
    Isn't that the point of the article and hence it's meaning. He'll get most of his snaps in the passing game and on ST of course.
     
  22. SteelCity_NB

    SteelCity_NB Staff Member Mod Team

    5,418
    684
    Oct 23, 2011
    I guess he gets on the field more maybe as a WR. Keeps people guessing when he is going to get the ball, as opposed to Rainey, who lined up at RB, and everyone on the defense knew he was going to get the ball.
     
  23. Kevin James

    Kevin James Well-Known Member

    300
    13
    Feb 11, 2012
    I agree with those who say this means very little. He is more of a weapon than a RB or WR. I would still say he is more of a RB than a WR and will never be a every down player. We will just have to be creative in ways to get him the ball, and he will be a good decoy.

    All I know is we better keep Moye around.
     
  24. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    34,163
    8,388
    Nov 14, 2011
    Why do they need to keep Moye around he caught 2 passes last season, and he was a UDFA.
     
  25. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    7,847
    1,845
    Sep 9, 2013
    Yeah AB, Wheaton, Moore, Bryant, Archer, and DHB are the guys were going to go with IMO. Looks like Moye could be an outright cut and J. Brown still has PS eligibility. Khasif Moore will have a chance too. This means we will likely only keep 4 RB's (including W. Johnson). He's kind of the 6th WR and 4th (non FB) RB all wrapped up in one.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!