1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Nice infographic about the 2011 draft

Discussion in 'The Bill Nunn Draft Room' started by SteelerNDC, May 8, 2014.

  1. SteelerNDC

    SteelerNDC Well-Known Member

    139
    0
    Oct 25, 2011
  2. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    15,648
    2,479
    Oct 26, 2011
    Yet KC/MT walk on water.
     
  3. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,513
    10,136
    Oct 16, 2011

    That chart doesn't mean much to me, 4 of their 7 picks were on defense, we all know it takes a while to integrate the D. They did pick 31 in that draft and still got a beast in Heyward. What does that matter though. And their over all draft has been better then the Panthers who only contribution has been Cam and they had the number 1 pick, we had 31st.

    But yeah, Colbert/Tomlin are terrible, take your 2 SB's and 3 appearances and go home, I spit on that, terrible, go home, boo, awful, spit spit.
     
  4. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011
    And that's GOT to change, don't you think, Blast? Especially for our early round (1st and 2nd) draft picks. We can't invest that much in players in the early rounds that essentially sit the bench their first 3 years in the league and then when they do get a chance to start they flash and are gone to another team or have us over a barrell (K. Lewis, J. Worilds, etc.).
     
  5. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    30,001
    6,188
    Oct 22, 2011
    old news. we also had 4 winning SB's in 10 years and a few other seasons we fell 1 game short of going before these two. 6 years ago we lost one and haven't sniffed one since. there is definitely room for improvement.:cool:
     
  6. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,513
    10,136
    Oct 16, 2011
    Different argument but let me ask you, did you mind so much when we were winning 12 games a season with a roster full of all pros and going to SB's?

    Irrelevant, his resume is his resume, you guys can spin it anyway you want.
     
  7. SteelCity_NB

    SteelCity_NB Staff Member Mod Team

    5,418
    684
    Oct 23, 2011
    There's definitely room for improvement. The '08 and '09 drafts, in hindsight, were terrible. Lots of bad mid round picks before that.

    Still, his resume is what it is at the end of the day. He's the best man for the job. Who else is out there that is better?
     
  8. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    30,001
    6,188
    Oct 22, 2011
    maybe he's not out there and right under our nose. Omar Kahn. all I know is he can't continue to rely on his past accomplishments just to be considered the best fit. different time and different people helping him pick in the past to build those SB teams. can we really say it's gone uphill since 2007?:cool:
     
  9. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011
    No but what I do mind is having a guy like Cam Heyward sit behind a guy like Ziggy Hood. What I do mind is a guy like Jason Worilds coming out and saying that he doesn't feel like he was given a fair shake by DL and the defensive coaching staff early in his career. In fact, he's convinced that he was held back. Now he may be right and he may be wrong and the truth may be somewhere in between, but there does seem to be some sentiment that these guys are made to pay their dues before they can get significant playing time. Also I mind that we let a guy like Keenan Lewis walk away and we stick too long with Ike Taylor who looked like burnt toast the biggest part of last year. I realize that there is a learning curve but first and second rounders need to be given opportunities to play early in their careers so we know what we have going forward. If DL's vaunted defensive schemes are too complicated then we need to simplify them and get these guys out there and contributing much sooner than they have historically.
     
  10. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,513
    10,136
    Oct 16, 2011
    They lost Lewis (who wanted to go home, I might add) and suddenly that's the norm. It's not, the norm is they tie up the guys they like more often then not. So if they are going to be retained, and still be here in the prime of their careers does it really matter if they took longer to get on the field. Usually it has more to do with the talent in front of them anyway but as I said, when we were winning SB's with DL's D, no one was complaining about how long it took for guys to see the field.

    As for Worilds, sounds whiney to me.
     
  11. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011
    I just think if it takes brain surgeons and rocket scientists to figure out the defense then DL needs to simplify it and just set the really good players up to play instinctual football earlier in their careers. I realize it's a little more complex than that but it just seems to me that the last several years the only ones that thought our defense was complicated were the players on our defense, not the players on opposing offenses or opposing OCs.
     
  12. antennaman1969

    antennaman1969 Well-Known Member

    281
    2
    Sep 9, 2012
    Waaaaah.

    Let's put the "can't take 3 years to see the field" stuff to bed, shall we?:beathorse:

    Heyward: had Casey Hampton, Aaron Smith, Chris Hoke, and Brett Keisel -probably some others; off the top of my head. At first, you could see he didn't get it. There's a lot to read and react into different gaps/formations in this D.
    Then, next season, he could come in and not stink it up for a few plays. Sometimes put a good series in. Last year, it clicked. Reacting quicker, looking more confident.

    Worilds: Would have had to come off the bus and outplay James Harrison. Didn't.
    Got opportunities for spot duty; When he did well, he got injured and couldn't be available to start.
    In the beginning, he also got the hook because he didn't get it either. He'd better show it over the long haul .
    Nobody's holding him back this year. No Harrison(yet), no Woodley, JJ is on the other side(?)

    He's the next man up.
     
  13. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011
    I'm not talking about late round draft picks and UDFAs, I'm primarily referring to 1st and 2nd round draft picks that we have a lot invested in that need to see the field quicker than they do. We don't need the DE version of Aaron Rodgers. And you can't tell me that Cam Heyward should have been sitting behind Ziggy Hood for essentially 3 years. I realize that he was technically Keisel's backup but he's a playmaker and should have been given the opportunity to unseat Hood. As for Hampton, didn't he get substantial playing time as a rookie?

    EDIT: I think I initially mis-read your post, but my point still stands. I see what you're saying with regard to Heyward and Worilds though. I just have some concerns that Heyward wasn't allowed to leapfrog Hood and that Worilds made comments that he felt as though he was held back and not given every opportunity for more playing time. Maybe that's Worilds just whining a bit but maybe there is some validity to it. I do understand your point, but now that we don't have the superstars on the defense that we once had, it's an absolute MUST that DL figure out how to get our young guys up to speed quicker.
     
  14. antennaman1969

    antennaman1969 Well-Known Member

    281
    2
    Sep 9, 2012
    Jack, I agree there should not be such a big learning curve to get on the field.
    I was OK with JJ getting out there and being baptized by fire. Get your money's worth. I think that the team needs to draft these hybrid guys for the secondary; and some ILB/OLB versatile players. Pick some smart guys. My dream is to draft some ballers who are also smart.:hmmm: A smart guy can pick the scheme up quicker. Might not be Superman out there, but his mind will tell him exactly where he needs to be and what is coming.

    The contracts that rooks get now do not allow for stashing guys away for 3 years. The CBA doesn't allow for the extra contact and practices that well-run teams used to take advantage of. It's not Noll or Lombardi's game anymore.:shrug:
    These guys have to take some responsibility and come in conditioned; then it's more scheme and playbook.

    We will see a lot more of what we saw last year. Several rookies on the field at the same time. Some starts even.
    Goodell is getting his wish. This is one of the many faces of PARITY.:twisted:
    YAY EVERYBODY!
     
  15. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011
    :this!::thumbs_up:
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!