Warren > Harris

Too far north and Canada wouldn't be happy

 

Do you disagree that a strong passing game can open things up for the running game?

 

No, it really isn't. Warren was dominant when he played. Gainwell may have only gotten three carries, but the snap count was much closer. There were far too many plays when Warren was on the sideline. The Steelers don't trust him with as heavy a workload as they gave Harris in the past. Given how well he was running, I would have liked to see Warren get five more carries. It is fair to argue that he didn't get them because the Steelers don't have as much faith in his durability as they had in Harris when he was a Steeler.

 

Cincy game

Warren 37 of 57 snaps

Gainwell 20 of 57

 

Yeah i am. 14 carries on the season with an ave below 3. Its not looking good so far. But notice i said it “looks” like a wasted pick, not “is”. Keep in mind Warren went undrafted and yet has performed better than our 1st round pick (Najee) and our third (Johnson). Maybe we need to spend our high end draft capital on other areas…

 

That's odd. Weren't they both on the field at the same time for a few plays?

 

No, In the year 2918 they were for one game

JUst Kidding

Of course they were. 22snaps 4 Gainwell
2 plays together most people call it a couple not few butthey

FFF happens to most
fatfknfingers

 

Yes wi aww no dis that four ewe

come SP65

 

Not 4 me
Too fat

 

O OK
U 8 4 2

 

No she wud
8 4 2
Too expensive

 

Other than @jeh1856
You are the coolest cat on here
@forgotten1

 

This just made the litter box crew poop

 

I see a troll agreed with you

Little @OB1

 

Ok

Using a Mark Madden reference to anyone was a low blow

I apologize

 

Aweee

 

Harris may never play again

so, yes, Warren > Harris

 

I read earlier today the Chargers are trying to trade for Hall to upgrade their offense.

 

Choose Wisely

 

now that right there is the definition of

PUTTING SOMEONE ON BLAST!!!!