Ryan Clark knocks Mike Tomlin for poor history of hiring coordinators

We know he hired them, the question is why? Was it incompetence or just wanting some dummy hired who wouldn't question some of Mike’s decisions

 

A REAL coach could/would motivate a player to play
anytime any where

no matter what

even in Denver!!!!!!!!

 

First Clark talked a lot as a player

Two being negative attracts a certain portion of the population and creates a niche so he makes money off of it he doesn’t have to be accurate or honest

Mark Madden for example makes a living being negative rude inaccurate and stupid and he has a following from the same demographic

 

If I have to motivate you I will fire you

- Chuck Noll

I had an employee walk into my office wanting a raise and he told me he would work harder if I gave him a raise

I took that as his resignation and responded accordingly

 

Was Clark wrong about what he said? Don't think so.

 

I still say Canada was a Rooney hire....He knew him more than anyone on this team, but that doesn't fit the narrative. Just like Haley was a Rooney hire.

 

Well the 2 who agreed with you are

one who no nunca nein don't speak english, watched football only since its' inception on youtube, and started this thread as well as mostall other bashing threads

the other meant to type T not G in member but failed


BOT....
RC has gone flat

 

It's not newsworthy is Clark just saying obvious things for clicks ?

 

How many Tomlin hires have gone on to to great, or even decent things? How many have gone to be HC’s?

 

How many good to great coordinators have gone on to become lousy HC's?

 

Arians, went on to be a two time Coach of the year, and a SB Champion. How many from Cowhers real tree became HCs, and won anything???

 

This has always been my opinion on the matter.
Not how many branches the tree has ,but how much fruit has those branches actually produced.
I mean Belichick has to have one of the biggest coaching trees, but how many actually bore fruit??? I can't think of a single one, but I maybe incorrect.