1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

How do you fix our Red Zone Offense ?

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Steelresolve, Nov 19, 2024.

  1. Parkbear

    Parkbear New Member

    4
    2
    Oct 23, 2024
    If I were the coach, here is what I would do......
    Run and pass out of a power formation using play action in the red zone with TE go route spaced with a TE/WR on the edge and one TE/WR in the back of the end zone. I would love to see run and passes out of a power formation and little more smash mouth type of play. You may get a 1 on 1 man if the defense out of a power formation where the defense has to stack the line. I really think a play action boot leg out of a power formation would be very successful as well.

    if you don't want to go the power route, maybe they need some creating play calling to spice things up. shovel pass, cross routes, screens (WR or conventional). How about a TE screen with Washington on the edge, tell me how that would be stopped. Maybe have a gadget play with fields line up as a receiver and do a reverse with the option to pass. Take these new concepts and plays and go live one day with the best defense in the league and see how it works with this extra time after thursday's game.

    I really believe the success of the offense is always dictated by line play and that doesn't change in the red zone. I would love to see the attitude of "we are going to run in the A gap announcement to the defense, stop us" mentality. then smash them in the mouth. It is sad that we have not seen this style of play for a long time.

    I think having counter plays can be very successful. for example. TE screen on edge with washington until they commit LB's to stop it and then run draw with harrison out of same formation with fake to the play that is killing them. Same concept as play action.

    My 2 cents for what it is worth.
     
  2. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    28,920
    5,860
    Oct 22, 2011
    if we score from outside the red zone we won't have to worry about it.:shrug::cool:
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. SteelinOhio

    SteelinOhio

    5,685
    1,474
    Oct 16, 2011
    I don't think we can blame Russ. Not that he can't have anything to do with it, but this has been a Steelers problem for several years, way before anyone even thought Russ would be in the picture. It's not a new problem this year.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. Brice

    Brice

    6,605
    1,869
    Jul 18, 2018
    Apparently there is an Arthur Smith interview where he hints at the Steelers using Justin Fields near the goal-line this week against Cleveland.
     
  5. Brice

    Brice

    6,605
    1,869
    Jul 18, 2018
    I am pretty sure in Matt Canada's offense, the plan on 3rd in 2 is to throw a quick pass 4 yards behind the line of scrimmage. :)
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. DJ18Baller

    DJ18Baller Well-Known Member

    4,704
    956
    Dec 8, 2021
    Also terrible but at least that is somewhat a bubble screen even if it never worked. The play to Jefferson was literally a hard out to the sidelines 2 yards short of the first down.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. Clive From PIT

    Clive From PIT I'm starting to drink the Koolaid! Site Admin

    3,137
    968
    Dec 14, 2015
    Not too fast, though—you need to give the defenders time to get there.
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. CK 13

    CK 13 Well-Known Member

    11,737
    2,908
    Nov 5, 2011
    Or consistently not getting beat at the point of attack in pass protection.

    Also someone that's the size of Wilt Chamberlin needs to jump! Might as well Jump! Jump! Instead of looking like he was a statue frozen by Medusa.

    Oh and also getting the other tight end with a fresh contract some red zone looks.

    Those who want to consistently use Fields I don't agree with. The element of surprise using Fields i'm in favor of used sparingly.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    31,038
    7,715
    Nov 14, 2011
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  10. SteelerJJ

    SteelerJJ Well-Known Member

    8,382
    482
    Oct 16, 2011
    I remember when Kordell was a backup and they used him near the goal line with an option play. It worked beautifully. Perhaps we can try that with Fields.
     
  11. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    7,057
    1,644
    Sep 9, 2013
    Well it was a problem in the Kenny Pickett years, but red zone offense is always going to be a struggle when your QB sucks. The last year that it was good was 2020 with Ben. We were the best in the league in 2018.

    Teams that are good in the redzone usually have 1 or more of the following elements
    1. A high end QB
    2. A high end RB
    3. A dual threat QB

    With Russ at the helm we have exactly 0 of the 3. I do think we can blame Russ to the extent that he is the worst graded QB in the red zone in the league. He is 7 of 24 passing in the red zone and while he's thrown 4 TD's to 1 INT in that area, we've only scored 25% of the trips the last 3 games... Not a good rate at all, and Russ has a good bit of the blame for that.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    35,911
    9,385
    Dec 23, 2020
    Stop with Russ not throwing to the middle of the field. He has thrown to the middle of the field more in 4 games than Fields has in 6. I really don't know where people get this information. Go look at the complete charts. People hear people saying this, and they just repeat it, and repeat it. Even when it's not true. For instance....how many times do You think Russell threw the ball to the middle of the field from where we started on each hash mark just in the last game???
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. SteelinOhio

    SteelinOhio

    5,685
    1,474
    Oct 16, 2011
    You think it's bad here, you should see reddit. It's nothing but that, and it seems like 90% of the time it's unfounded.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  14. woofermazing

    woofermazing Member

    22
    3
    Sep 10, 2024
    It's by design and by philosophy. We spend big time on defense. We're built to win with field goals. Our skill positions and o-line are not great. You have to win your matchups and have great execution in the red zone. Midfield is more forgiving and you can scheme guys open.
     
  15. Steelrules

    Steelrules Well-Known Member

    2,048
    650
    May 12, 2013
  16. Da Stellars

    Da Stellars Well-Known Member

    8,246
    1,089
    Oct 22, 2011
    • This team needs to be run dominant, but they just can’t. Our line is average, and Naj shouldn’t be touching the ball. You can’t convince me the offense isn’t better with Warren.
    • There is no emphasis on getting Friermuth the ball.
    • Think back the past 30 years…where would you rank this WR room? Outside of Pickens, it doesn’t scare you at all.
     
  17. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    7,057
    1,644
    Sep 9, 2013
    All pretty valid points. I've said that the offense looks better with Warren because he is better in space. You can do more with Warren. Najee is a plodder that balls out 3 games a season, yet we just relentlessly hand him the ball. The WR room is garbage. Pickens is really good, and he's all we got. Austin can be a pretty solid #3, but he isn't someone to rely on to pick up the slack and force teams to respect him over Pickens.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. Da Stellars

    Da Stellars Well-Known Member

    8,246
    1,089
    Oct 22, 2011
    This team needs another receiving threat, not just a wr…

    I’d activate Roman Wilson.
     
  19. DJ18Baller

    DJ18Baller Well-Known Member

    4,704
    956
    Dec 8, 2021
    Why? He would be hurt during the second practice play on Wednesday. Let the fragile little guy rest.
     
  20. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    31,038
    7,715
    Nov 14, 2011
  21. MojaveDesertPghFan

    MojaveDesertPghFan

    8,546
    3,415
    Oct 19, 2011
    Worked with Slash but.............they'd probably call a triple reverse fumble-rooski flea flicker that takes about 3 minutes to play out and then Wilson would throw it intentionally into the stands. Fun to watch, time-consuming but same result. :rolleyes:
     
  22. Bubbahotep

    Bubbahotep Well-Known Member

    243
    63
    Mar 19, 2022
    1st down rushing in the RZ is a failure for the most part. I've charted it up. Harris gets the vast majority of runs in the RZ on 1st down (22 atts). Yet he only averages slightly more than 2.5 yds.
    Muth has been thrown the ball a couple of times on 1st downs with some success. The playcalling is far too predictable right now. And the execution doesn't help.

    1st Down RZ Rushing.png
     
  23. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    15,150
    2,409
    Oct 26, 2011
    We shall see?
     
  24. JAD

    JAD Well-Known Member

    3,349
    369
    Jan 2, 2012
    Do what we been saying here for a while. Pass on 1st down some just like yesterdays game. Quit being so so so predictable.
     
  25. jeh1856

    jeh1856 Happy Holidays Yinz Jagoffs

    29,847
    11,009
    Oct 26, 2011
    I was just thinking that

    Just score before getting to the red zone
     
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!