Flat earth discussion

I said, why ban videos. I did not say why ban everything about flat earth.

So anyhow you look at that app on its flight path yet? You see that it puts the exact location of where the plane is going and its flight path? Or do you just like arguing to argue and to disrespect others for having different thoughts?

 

and I showed you they haven’t banned the videos. It shows the flight through a three dimensional place in a two dimensional format. Why is that so hard for you to comprehend?

 

I apologize for my involvement in this

 

Naw bro. You're all good. I like having this talk. Because i like to see both sides. I wish schools taught to see both sides instead of regurgitate what a teacher/book says. And I say that with having several degrees and I think I'm one of the rare, who finished school with a dual diploma.

Again I'm not a flat earth or a globalist.

 

So let's start at do you understand that the location that it says it is, is the exact location? Just a yes or no.

 

That’s the difference between plotting on a gnomonic chart vs a Mercator projection. A”great circle” course plotted on a gnomonic chart becomes an arced course on a Mercator projection due to the curvatures of the earth. Pretty basic navigation

 

So if we can let's try to focus on what you know abs don't know. Who cares about freedom of speech, what is or isn't banned.

There's several points made at the start that are not in favor of a globe earth.

So here is another....



Since the sun is said to be so far away, then why are the sun rays like a dove tail? Again if you make everything to scale like this....


Where the earth is a basketball. The moon would be about the size of tennis ball and 20' away. And the sun 3 miles away and 200' size.

But that would make the rays going straight up and down.


Also still to my earlier point about distance, a tilt of 3 degree should not be raising and lowering the temperature by 30%+.

 

The shortest distance to Alaska to dubai is a straight line. Yet it arches.

This happens on all flight with that kind of distance.

While on a flat earth map, it's a straight line.

 

The only time you see a flight path arch is when it goes over the notth pole. (I understand the image for the south pole, however it is a rare path. And you cannot fly over antarctic).


Furthermore when a plane is flying longitude, it does not arch. It's a straight path on the globe. But when a plane travels latitude, it arches.

 

Satellite images, astronauts in space, moon landing and the videos of earth from space and so on all prove earth is round. Why would flat earth be taught in schools when there's enough peer reviewed articles disproving it's flat let alone images proving it's round? Should the 7 day creation myth be taught side by side with the big bang and string theories?

 

target moved in 3,2,1

 

several degrees?

 

I'm not here to debate what nasa and others have done. Nor go thru hundreds of videos of them caught in lies. You can. But I've been down that road and with how many lies they have been caught in has made them an unreliable source.

I like to dive into what people actually believe without what someone told them. That's one of America problems is teaching kids to regurgitate, instead of having them think for themselves. And now they're grown up and have to look up Google to tell them the answer to why sun rays look like a dove tail, why a plane arches latitude by not longitude, walking around the neighborhood analogy, rail gun shotting straight to not having to curve, etc etc.

To many globalist just pass things off as a fact, but understand it very little. Yet they have the nerve to laugh at someone who brings up flat earth.

 

So that's your answer? Or can Google not tell you what the answer is?

 

A few comments were enough for me. This explains the ridiculousness of @Mashburn posts over in the Steelers section.

 

If you want to believe Good Morning America is lying to you when they're interviewing an astronaut in space, be my guest. I've read enough peer reviewed articles when I was in college and a slew of science journals before/after college.

What is the gain in lying to people regarding the shape of the planet? The average American couldn't care less if it was flat or round as long as they eat turkey on Thanksgiving and blast fireworks on Independence Day? Perhaps they could be lying about extraterrestrial life; there's a ton to gain in lying about that. But this topic... nah.

 

So instead of discussion of points I made, you just rather regurgitate what your belief is on what a theory is that you can't prove.

And yes the tables were turned not to long ago where people were killed and jailed for thinking it was a gone. And I would have argued for them to speak.



So let's do this..... since you're so strong into gravity as a fact regardless what anyone else or what even science definition is. Just show me on your own a ball free spinning of doing 24,000 mph and able to keep water on it.

 

I have theories on the benefit to lie, as well how easy it is. But I prefer not to.

 

So now we're crushing the circular argument fallacy on top on the consider the source fallacy. Let's face it, this entire discussion is a logical fallacy.

 

I almost wrote all this. Glad I read ahead.