Steelers sign Mitch Trubisky

After reading through this thread I’ve come to the conclusion that the so-called football analyst doesn’t care what anyone here thanks. LMAO

 

The Bengals were tied for 15th last yr in team ints with 13. That doesn't sound like a secondary ball hawking all over the place. I said they didn't dominate in the playoffs to get where they got. Every PLAYOFF WIN they were literally close to losing. They were not better than any of the teams they beat except maybe the raiders. Their losses are more about what the other teams didn't do then more so what they did do.

They had an mvp at qb who was playing mvp level football the first few weeks, John Harbaugh, and tucker. Defense got by with making a few plays here and there. Typically when you have a league mvp caliber guy at qb you can play smoke and mirrors to hold it together.

And for such a great job the bengals by all the odds are not favored to win their division. Not the favorite to win the afc or superbowl. Kc has been the favorite the last few years until now. Why? Because they were actually better than everybody and didn't get by with luck.

 

Man Steelers.com is doing all this pr and press on Trubisky signing ... it is going to be funny when they most likely draft the future starter in about a month.

If they draft one high enough they will definitely be starting sometime this year.

 

By the time He should see the field...will be about time 2 let him go. Then we can get one of the other Qbs that came out with Him for free, and Have another Qb room like We have now....a room of 1st round picks by other people that can't stop getting fascinated by guys throw at air in their shorts.
Think about it.
We have Mason(who they said they gave a 1st round grade on) Haskins (someone else 1st round mistake), and Trubisky (someone else 1st round mistake).
Now We want 2 add another.....1st round mistake. LoL

 

Rodgers, Rivers.......

 

And y’all trusting this front office to draft the right guy?

 

Honestly, I don't want them to draft a QB. Doesn't seem like a strong class, and we ain't picking high anyways...

Maybe some of the QBs in this class turn out to be really good, but as of right now I'm not totally seein it.

Steelers have so many holes, they could stand to just work on the rest of the team.

 

Apparently, you think interceptions are the only way a secondary can make plays. You are more lost than I thought.

They weren't better than the teams they beat? Do you understand how ridiculous you sound? They beat the Chiefs twice. Seriously, just stop making a fool of yourself.

The Ravens were a mess long before Jackson got hurt. They were the ones getting by on luck in the early past of last season. Then their luck ran out. Trust me. I wish you were right about the Bengals, but you clearly are not. It seems to be a habit with you.

 

Yeah. I'm not sure 2 be honest.
I gotta be hopeful.

 

1st. Mahomes He's not, or Rivers.
Rodgers had B. Farvre in front of Him....So.
Actually the point I was trying 2 make was if they just wait 3- 4 years they can get M. Willis, and this crew of Qbs like they got Trubisky.

 

He doesn’t, but he should, not so much here, but in life

I hope he is not a business major

Everything in business is based on what people think of you and if they trust you

 

So? The saints a year ago beat the bucs twice. It's been plenty of teams swept by a team in their division who didn't even make the playoffs and they did.

Also wasn't I talking about the 4 ints tannehill throw them? That's why I brought up ints. That was an Anatoly for the Bengals and it was about what tannehill did more than anything they did. Also they were 26th in opponent psss yards per game. So again what were you saying about their secondary? It's not good. You can't name one elite guy in that secondary. Bates is ok but not elite.

And every game they bets the chiefs again I can point to the mistakes the chiefs made over them.

And guess what without hill the chiefs are STILL favorited to win the afc over them. The Ravens are favorited over them to win the division. If they were just that good and not a fluke and improved so much why are all the odds against them? Vegas doesn't like losing money..

And sounding ridiculous to you doesn't mean anything. Looking like a fool to you also doesn't mean anything lol.

 

I’ve actually warmed up to the idea of Willis at 20 if he’s still there now that we’ve signed Trubisky and there won’t be as much pressure on him to perform the first two years of his career. May be worth the risk with his upside. I’d still rather go OL or DL in the first and then grab maybe Ridder or Howell in the second.

 

Given the lack of skilled analysis you have demonstrated so far, I will simply roll my eyes at your claim that those interceptions of Tannehil were more his mistakes than the Bengals making plays.

The Bengals didn't just beat the Chiefs twice. The second one was in the playoffs. The storyline of both games was pretty much the same. It is ludicrous to try to blow those off as flukes. The Bengals went further and beat the team twice. They were better than the Chiefs last year. Get over it.

Vegas may not like losing money, but they did exactly that both times they bet against the Bengals against the Chiefs last year.

 

So if you're so much smarter thsn Vegas why are they ones giving the odds and not you? Someone would be paying you millions to give picks if you knew more than they do like your insuitating by trying to callout what they got wrong so if you're trying to question they're credibility on evaluating games. No one is 100% right. Did Brady win every single sb or play great in every one? No. But people consider him the goat because MORE OFTEN than not he was right.

They were not better than the chiefs. Again explain why no odds nor anyone anywhere have them as the favorite over the chiefs if they were just so much better and they added additions while the chiefs got worse and their STILL FAVORED OVER THEM by everybody.

Colin cowherd the guy ppl used on here for evidence on rubies picked Cincy to miss the playoffs and pointed out the same things I did. Got lucky.

And I don't care about you rolling your eyes or anything.

Put how much money you want down on the Bengals not making the sb again next yr. Put your money where all this confidence from your mouth is.

 

Seriously, you are still arguing that even though the Bengals beat the Chiefs twice in two meetings, the second one in the AFC Championship Game, they were not better.

 

https://sportsnaut.com/super-bowl-odds-best-value-bets-2022-nfl-season/amp/

https://www.vegasinsider.com/nfl/odds/futures/

https://www.bonus.com/odds/super-bowl/

Why do all these sites have the chiefs who got worse the favorites over the Bengals and some even have the Bengals with the THIRD BEST ODDS TO WIN THEIR OWN DIVISION. Why is everyone going against what you're saying who claims to know it all? If the Bengals were better why aren't THEY the favorite?

 

I like rubies! Rich, red color. My favorite gemstone.

 

Oh... @Blast Furnace ..

 

I guess the Rams should return that Lombardi Trophy. They aren’t the favorites to win in 2022, so the really aren’t the Super Bowl Champions.

 

You know Arkansas beat Gonzaga yesterday. A 4 seed beating the #1 seed. Your odds of winning the Super Bowl just shows your argument to be completely inconclusive and really makes you sound kinda dumb in your perspective. JS

 

I have never done the lottery, and really don't know much about it. . I have played, and do watch tons of football.
Example. I can play Guitar, banjo, bass, mandolin, and a bit of piano, but I can't fly a helicopter. LoL