Steelers sign FA tackle

[/QUOTE]

it depends on what the conversation is about the other women. it could very easily be a conversation that has no bearing to your date being offended. just like we shouldn't talk about other teams in our division that will effect our player's going up against them sometimes 3 times a year. it is very much part of what we should be talking about on a steeler site. i do feel like i have an investment in the team because that money goes to the team and by the way is shared by the other teams in the league. every time you by anything that is nfl licensed that money is shared by all the teams not just the one you root for. so talking about them isn't something you shouldn't do or be considered not being loyal or strange. the hall monitors on here need to mind their own business. talk football and not attack another poster. yes he did attack my post and me just by saying something about my loyalty to the steelers team.

 

it depends on what the conversation is about the other women. it could very easily be a conversation that has no bearing to your date being offended. just like we shouldn't talk about other teams in our division that will effect our player's going up against them sometimes 3 times a year. it is very much part of what we should be talking about on a steeler site. i do feel like i have an investment in the team because that money goes to the team and by the way is shared by the other teams in the league. every time you by anything that is nfl licensed that money is shared by all the teams not just the one you root for. so talking about them isn't something you shouldn't do or be considered not being loyal or strange. the hall monitors on here need to mind their own business. talk football and not attack another poster. yes he did attack my post and me just by saying something about my loyalty to the steelers team. [/QUOTE]

How dare you pile a hypothetical to explain my hypothetical... That simply is not done... A post can get away with one, perhaps, but absolutely not two...
You obviously have very little dating experience... If you just mention another woman on a date... that has significant bearing on your date being offended... No, I didn't attack your loyalty, or you, even though you called me names in your post... I attacked the idea that BUYing thing, spending time, or living in the Pittsburgh area (Etna, Pa. Allegheny Co... REPRESENT!) has anything to do with loyalty to an NFL team... Attacking an idea in a post is the purpose of chatrooms... Fortunately, I can discern the difference between calling people names and having differing opinions on what is "chatworthy" on a Steelersfans chatboard...

 

How dare you pile a hypothetical to explain my hypothetical... That simply is not done... A post can get away with one, perhaps, but absolutely not two...
You obviously have very little dating experience... If you just mention another woman on a date... that has significant bearing on your date being offended... No, I didn't attack your loyalty, or you, even though you called me names in your post... I attacked the idea that BUYing thing, spending time[/QUOTE]

please, you did and you know you did. if you look at my post i simply said i hope chuks and moore can handle them. i didn't say they couldn't. i said i hope they can. the line stunk last year, i hope it gets better this year. also again now you attack my dating experience. keep trying to be the the not at fault guy but what you print passively is just another attack and you know it. what's it to you what i say? don't read it if you don't like it glenn.

 

please, you did and you know you did. if you look at my post i simply said i hope chuks and moore can handle them. i didn't say they couldn't. i said i hope they can. the line stunk last year, i hope it gets better this year. also again now you attack my dating experience. keep trying to be the the not at fault guy but what you print passively is just another attack and you know it. what's it to you what i say? don't read it if you don't like it glenn. [/QUOTE]
"gum flapper," I believe you called ME, not my post...

no but he ain't no lamar jackson either. he has been sacked 111 times and 27 fumbles. --RAVENS
browns just traded for winovich. two edge guys i hope chuks and moore can handle twice a year. --BROWNs

I find it strange... I don't define that as "Loyal," regardless of who is saying it....

 

"gum flapper," I believe you called ME, not my post...

no but he ain't no lamar jackson either. he has been sacked 111 times and 27 fumbles. --RAVENS
browns just traded for winovich. two edge guys i hope chuks and moore can handle twice a year. --BROWNs

I find it strange... I don't define that as "Loyal," regardless of who is saying it....[/QUOTE]

did you put it in the perspective that it was answering another post? those are trubisky's stats, not an un-loyal statement i made up. they are what they are. how is that not being loyal? OK how's this, super bowl baby. this was the guy that will get us over the hump. only the steelers were smart enough to see that. better?

 

did you put it in the perspective that it was answering another post? those are trubisky's stats, not an un-loyal statement i made up. they are what they are. how is that not being loyal? OK how's this, super bowl baby. this was the guy that will get us over the hump. only the steelers were smart enough to see that. better? [/QUOTE]

Socks THEN shoes... Sequence matters.... You brought up trubisky AFTER a Raven... You brought up chuks and Moore AFTER your post about winovich... They have to handle 15 sets of OTHER edge rushers who you omitted...

 

--I do what I can....
I get along with EVERYBODY-- it's my cross to bear...

 

it depends on what the conversation is about the other women. it could very easily be a conversation that has no bearing to your date being offended. just like we shouldn't talk about other teams in our division that will effect our player's going up against them sometimes 3 times a year. it is very much part of what we should be talking about on a steeler site. i do feel like i have an investment in the team because that money goes to the team and by the way is shared by the other teams in the league. every time you by anything that is nfl licensed that money is shared by all the teams not just the one you root for. so talking about them isn't something you shouldn't do or be considered not being loyal or strange. the hall monitors on here need to mind their own business. talk football and not attack another poster. yes he did attack my post and me just by saying something about my loyalty to the steelers team. [/QUOTE]
Did you mean to quote me? I’m just guilty of facepalms.

 

If Glemm ever comes back

 

Did you mean to quote me? I’m just guilty of facepalms.[/QUOTE]


i don't believe so.

 

what do you guys think about haeg? he didn't play terrible but do we draft a tackle and cut him saving money and keeping the youth movement going. we have met with quite a few OT's and they run throughout the rounds spectrum. i was leaning towards rasheed walker from penn state. if we draft one does heag go?

 

He is cheap enough that I have to think that they keep him at least through camp as injury insurance rather than have to rely on a rookie in that eventuality.

 

they do have chaz green still.