NFL free agency thread 2022 rumors and signings

What is the different from a Trade or free agency? In both cases you're getting a qb their original team DIDNT WANT. the pats didn't want Brady no more. Chargers didn't want Brees. Whats so different than a trade?

 

GO GET HIM

 

Do we know his hand size?

 

Ummm.....Draft picks, and possibly players lost...plus paying the guy.. Come on....You know the dang difference. FA....you just pay the guy...not trade away picks, players, and pay the guy. I would say a big difference.

 

Sorry. Disagree. You can't sign that many players....especially pro bowlers, and SB MVPs, and say they didn't have anything 2 do with it. Same with Tampa.
If they didn't then why do sign all of them, and the Rams ones are off the top of My head. I bet I could find more.

 

You have to pay him regardless if he's a free agent or you trade for him. You said you're getting a guy that their team didn't want. Not the picks and all that. And yes you give up picks but every single gm in the nfl would give up multiple picks for a franchise qb. They do it for unproven guys in the draft so you think they won't for an already proven nfl guy?

 

Yet Sean mcvay thought had they had a competent qb they'd won the sb a few years ago.

 

You asked the difference. I told You.
.
If You don’t know the difference in Drafting a guy with one pick, and paying him basically peanuts compared...2... trading multiple picks,players, and paying a guy money that will automatically count big against the cap......Well....I don't know what 2 say.???

 

So Bengals should trade Burrows away???? LoL

 

Burrow is a competent qb lol. He's not Jared Goff.

 

I was talking about how teams move heaven in earth tod raft guys. Like the nines just did last yr. So if teams are doing that for an unproven guy why wouldn't they do it for proven guys. They already do but I'm just saying. And good qbs count against the cap. Just a part of the game.

 

sony michael was a huge pickup for the rams. he helped get them in. even when their starter came back they ran sony. he got that running game clicking.

 

Fuller is injury prone, I would rather get a speedy WR in the draft.

 

I understood the topic just fine. There is absolutely nothing I posted that was wrong, so you're making that up. The rhetorical tactic works better if it is accurate.

You were wrong about the Rams and didn't know about the Bucs. Regardin the Rams, moves during the season count no matter how much you wish they didn't. The Rams probably don't win it all without Beckham and Weddle. The former had a huge first half in the Super Bowl and the latter was calling the defensive signals and making plays when it counted most.

Regarding the Bucs, even in the post in which you acknowledged that you would have to look at the moves they made, you insisted that it was getting Brady that won them the Super Bowl. Sorry, it wasn't just that. They rebuilt the offensive line and added Gronkowski and Fournette. Those alone were huge parts of that team's success.

 

He knows Watson is coming to Pittsburgh

 

Honing his Tok Tok skills.

 

I still would rather have Jordan Hicks.

 

Hell No! I hope the Steelers are not dumb enough to mortgage the future of the franchise for Watson.

 

I think you're missing the main point. Would they have won their respective sbs without the other pieces they added besides the qb? Possibly. Especially the rams. Most of that same team was in the sb 2 years ago. There though is a very good chance they win those sbs without those other guys they added. There is ZERO chance they win those sbs without the respective qbs they added. That's the point. The qbs were the main reason they won. Why do teams give up more compensation for qbs compared to any other position? They effect the game far more than any other player.