1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Does Paxton Lynch dress this week???

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by steel_ben7, Dec 16, 2019.

  1. steel_ben7

    steel_ben7 Well-Known Member

    1,686
    408
    Nov 16, 2015
    I mean at this point if Duck stinks it up again and they don’t wanna go back to Rudolph then why not at least maybe consider dressing Lynch this week. I don’t know much about this guy but he is a former number 1 pick, he has been with the team now for 3 months and should know the offense. And you’re doing whatever you need to do at QB these last 2 games to make the damn playoffs.

    So if I’m Tomlin and he is concerned about Duck after how he played last night then why not dress Lynch and have him available at least as an option. It probably won’t happen but it’s not the worst idea in the world either to suggest.
     
  2. SteelersFanIrl

    SteelersFanIrl Well-Known Member

    4,011
    1,208
    Mar 3, 2019
    I don’t know a whole lot about Lynch, have hardly watched him. What I do know is that he was a relatively recent first round pick that was out of football until the Steelers were forced to bring another body in. He was an epic bust by all accounts. I can’t imagine he is a better option than Duck or Mason tbh.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. CK 13

    CK 13 Well-Known Member

    12,032
    2,990
    Nov 5, 2011
    Is he naked?
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 5
    • Like Like x 1
  4. Jammasterc

    Jammasterc Well-Known Member

    15,719
    1,363
    Oct 26, 2011
    Gotta find quality or just capable backups for whoever is the starter next year.
    Rivers or Manning might not make a full season.
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  5. TuRnDoWnForWaTT

    TuRnDoWnForWaTT Well-Known Member

    8,508
    3,369
    Jan 1, 2018
    Hodges isnt the first, and wont be the last, to play a bad game against a good defense. Give Hodges a chance to redeem himself. If he can't, then go back to Mason. Those are our two options at this point. I doubt Paxton Lynch is even in the conversation.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  6. STEELWINDS

    STEELWINDS

    1,484
    346
    Sep 12, 2019
    Hey steel_ben7

    Well, if we are going to do it, lets do it now against the Jets. Get a "full" game under his belt as we march towards a potential playoff run. I was all on board with Mason even after the Browns' game. I did say let him start the next one against the Bengals but agreed with the pulling of him in that game. I would also say go through the same route with Duck. However, we really do not have the time left to see how Duck performs against the Jets knowing there is only one regular season game left after that. I would rather see Lynch get a whole game under his belt right now before deciding who is going to be the QB in the final game.


    STEELWINDS AKA The East Side Kid
     
    Last edited: Dec 17, 2019
    • Disagree Disagree x 3
  7. JAD

    JAD Well-Known Member

    3,424
    383
    Jan 2, 2012
    Did you see Duck throw those Ducks yesterday.
     
  8. defva

    defva Well-Known Member

    6,110
    642
    Oct 19, 2011
    Ducks confidence was shattered after the first two int's... just like MR. Mentally, they're done. Very winnable game last night. But, we gift wrapped it away.
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2019
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  9. AskQuestionsLater

    AskQuestionsLater Writing Team

    24,101
    6,131
    Apr 21, 2016
    Doubtful that Paxton suits up. Even though he does have the First Round pedigree, history is against him here. Quarterbacks over 6'6 are not successful in this league.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  10. TuRnDoWnForWaTT

    TuRnDoWnForWaTT Well-Known Member

    8,508
    3,369
    Jan 1, 2018
    I did. He is a 3rd string undrafted QB. I was never one to think that Hodges was some sort of savior. Not suprised the Duck calls finally brought in the Ducks. I always knew they were coming.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. AFan

    AFan Well-Known Member

    3,736
    808
    Oct 24, 2011
    Dress Paxton? to what end?

    I can see the logic of continuity with starting Duck, especially if the team thinks Rudolph is still frazzled from his most recent experiences.

    I can see the logic of starting Rudolph. Duck has crashed to earth, Rudolph has pedigree and you might as well see how he responds to adversity, especially if you still consider him a potential successor to Ben.

    But playing Paxton, to me, just reeks of desperation. Hoping against hope that his fairy tale might come true, now that Ducks fairy tale appears to be in tatters.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  12. dobbler-33

    dobbler-33 Well-Known Member

    5,388
    1,385
    Nov 13, 2011
    Agree as well, I just can't agree with the logic of the play calling that I personally think put last nights debacle where it landed. Rudolph got broke and it showed and the move had to be made. Duck been filling in and they've survived. He was put in a bad spot last night and asked too much of in my opinion. Now if Randy is gonna continue to play asinine ball, it don't matter and yinz can dress whomever at this point. But I say continuity and for **** sakes play some situational ball'
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  13. groutbrook

    groutbrook

    7,992
    1,732
    Oct 23, 2016
    Elway fell in love with Lynch's big arm and figured he could be groomed. Elway felt he was wrong, but didn't even give Lynch enough time to find out.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. AskQuestionsLater

    AskQuestionsLater Writing Team

    24,101
    6,131
    Apr 21, 2016

    Fair enough I suppose. That said, given the fact that Paxton has been promoted to the 53 roster for this long tells me that maybe Mike sees something in him perhaps?!?! Doubtful he is the future but perhaps a backup?!
     
  15. groutbrook

    groutbrook

    7,992
    1,732
    Oct 23, 2016
    I really don't know much about Lynch, but Elway switches quarterbacks like it's a bodily function.
     
    Last edited: Dec 20, 2019
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  16. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    15,696
    2,500
    Oct 26, 2011
    NO, there are so many players currently on the roster
    that I could purge. I would have there head spinning.
     
  17. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    34,170
    8,394
    Nov 14, 2011
    Actually it is the worst idea :facepalm:, Lynch isn't playing unless there are injuries. If Duck struggles you put Rudolph back in there.
     
  18. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    17,067
    5,043
    Nov 4, 2011
    Who knows? None of us are at practice. If Lynch is getting a good handle on the offense, it’s possible that he could be a better option than Rudolph if we need to make a change. I have very little confidence in Rudolph right now.

    As for whether a change needs to be made, I think we need to see how Hodges responds. Rudolph responded poorly after his debacle vs. the Browns. Rudolph had an opportunity to reset against a mediocre Bengals team, but he looked terrible and rattled from the first snap of the game. Hodges had a rough outing against one of the top 2 or 3 pass defenses on the league. Let’s see how he responds.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. SteelersFanIrl

    SteelersFanIrl Well-Known Member

    4,011
    1,208
    Mar 3, 2019
    I think vs the Jets you go back to trusting the Defence, running the football and taking the throws that are there. The Jets are not a particularly good team, Duck can manage that game I think, unless he lets last Sunday’s get in his head.

    Last Sunday was a mess on offence both from a play calling and execution point of view. They need to put it behind them and move on. If Duck is clearly rattled I’d consider putting Rudolph back in but ideally you let him sit until next pre season and give him a chance to get back on track then.
     
  20. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    17,067
    5,043
    Nov 4, 2011
    Unfortunately the Jets have the league’s #2 run defense (#1 in yards per rush allowed) and the #19 pass defense. It’s likely that we’ll need to throw the ball with some success to generate points on offense.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  21. santeesteel

    santeesteel

    12,588
    3,447
    Oct 17, 2011
    So was Ryan Leaf.
    Paxton did not do well in Denver. To be fair, they gave up on him pretty quickly. Maybe there's a reason?
     
  22. SteelersFanIrl

    SteelersFanIrl Well-Known Member

    4,011
    1,208
    Mar 3, 2019
    Didn’t realise that, they do have a couple of very good defensive linemen but I haven’t been following their stats. Interesting to see how the Steelers approach it in that case
     
  23. HeinzMustard

    HeinzMustard Well-Known Member

    12,166
    3,085
    Nov 18, 2015
    Mike Glennon was against the Steelers. :facepalm:
     
  24. cajunyankee

    cajunyankee Well-Known Member

    4,135
    686
    Oct 27, 2011
    No......

    We ride with Mason and Duck.......

    Why??? Because they will be here next year and Paxton won’t

    Cajun
     
  25. steelers5859

    steelers5859 Well-Known Member

    2,882
    68
    Oct 23, 2011
    This is a MUST game. We don't bring in Paxton Lynch to be experimental. If Duck plays poorly, then you go back to Mason Rudolph.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!