1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Josh Gordon released off IR

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by uncblue012, Oct 31, 2019.

  1. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    25,210
    4,114
    Dec 18, 2016
    Why? Gordon is a better player.

    To be fair, their issues are not the same. Gordon has screwed up more. He isn't just a pothead. He's an addict. If that is why you don't want him, I absolutely see the point. He's risk, but one that makes sense at this point.
     
    • Very Optimistic Very Optimistic x 1
  2. Roonatic

    Roonatic Well-Known Member

    8,558
    1,814
    Sep 4, 2017
    Gordon is mentally fragile, that's my reason to say no.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    25,210
    4,114
    Dec 18, 2016
    That's fair. He's got serious issues. I'm surprised he was even allowed to play after his last incident.

    To me, the risk seems to be relatively low with the potential for a big payoff.
     
  4. Roonatic

    Roonatic Well-Known Member

    8,558
    1,814
    Sep 4, 2017
    Tomlin might be trying to get away from babysitting & pandering to the special needs players. This would be a step back imo.
     
  5. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    25,210
    4,114
    Dec 18, 2016
    That makes sense, too. I disagree, but I get it.

    To me, if they are willing to take Chickillo back, they should be willing to take a risk on Gordon.
     
  6. HeinzMustard

    HeinzMustard Well-Known Member

    11,841
    2,941
    Nov 18, 2015
    WRs are going to be OK if Rudolph progresses. We'll see. IMO, we don't need to bring anybody in unless injuries pile up.
     
  7. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    29,638
    6,027
    Oct 22, 2011
    We are getting no production out of 3 out of 6 of our receivers. Actually 4 out of 6. I'd like to see Gordon and another FA that's just sitting out there brought in. Plus a comp pick. Why not at this point?:cool:
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    25,210
    4,114
    Dec 18, 2016
    I don't know how anybody can watch this team and say they don't need help at receiver. Of course, Smith-Schuster is an excellent starter and Johnson is coming along nicely, but nobody else is producing. Washington, Switzer, Holton and Moncrief have only 22 receptions combined. Holton still hasn't caught a pass. Switzer averages a pathetic 3.4 yards per reception on his eight catches. Moncrief has done more damage than good. Washington is the best of that group, but he certainly isn't good.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. Brandon556211

    Brandon556211

    4,349
    704
    Sep 11, 2018
    That's going to be a no from me dawg.


    And yes I know the Steelers could use Wide Out help.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. SteelerGlenn

    SteelerGlenn

    21,297
    4,812
    Nov 24, 2011
    It’s one thing to be accused of something and another to be found guilty.
    No thanks on Gordon for me.
     
  11. SteelerGlenn

    SteelerGlenn

    21,297
    4,812
    Nov 24, 2011
    Those saying cut Moncrief and sign Gordon to get the comp pick. Is that really going to work? Wouldn’t we just be trading one FA for another?
     
  12. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    16,694
    4,886
    Nov 4, 2011
    So, I was a big fan of the Washington pick a couple of years ago, and I still see too much long-run potential to cut bait, but he is not playing well at all. At least not at his primary role, which is catching passes.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    16,694
    4,886
    Nov 4, 2011
    No. Signing players who were cut does not affect the formula.
     
  14. SteelerGlenn

    SteelerGlenn

    21,297
    4,812
    Nov 24, 2011
    Thanks for the clarification.
     
  15. SDOT

    SDOT Well-Known Member

    4,985
    689
    Aug 1, 2016
    :facepalm:
     
  16. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    32,714
    7,930
    Nov 14, 2011
    I knew this thread was coming :facepalm:, if Gordon couldn't produce with Brady and the Patriots, would he produce with a lesser QB with Pittsburgh?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. TheTerribleOwl

    TheTerribleOwl Well-Known Member

    1,510
    339
    Sep 1, 2017
    Mother Theresa was a horrible human being.
     
  18. SDOT

    SDOT Well-Known Member

    4,985
    689
    Aug 1, 2016
    A lot of WR have gone to NE and not produced. Brandin Cooks had his worst statistical year with Brady. Gordon produced enough. He fills a need, we need a deep threat. We just need him to run go routes all game and catch a few to draw a double team here and there. We are getting rid of Moncrief for the 3rd round comp so it's a no brainer.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  19. bigbenhotness

    bigbenhotness Well-Known Member

    21,634
    3,384
    Nov 1, 2014
    What who how
     
  20. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    32,714
    7,930
    Nov 14, 2011
    The Steelers aren't even in the top 10 for the waiver claim, I don't see it happening.
     
  21. STEELWINDS

    STEELWINDS

    1,484
    346
    Sep 12, 2019
    Yes, it just makes you wonder what group of WRs are the Front Office looking at. I am so sick of hearing about "well we as fans do not know what the inner-workings are of the FO behind the scenes." And yes, true to a degree. However, I know what I see each game and it is probably the same as what most fans see as well as the FO. Given that, it is obvious we need help at the WR position.... NOW!. STEELWINDS
     
  22. blackandgoldpatrol

    blackandgoldpatrol Well-Known Member

    5,437
    2,128
    Dec 5, 2011

    I'm pretty sure we can only cut moncrief and not bring anyone else in...... the comp pick is based on team loss and gain
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  23. SDOT

    SDOT Well-Known Member

    4,985
    689
    Aug 1, 2016
    She must have smoked the devils lettuce once according to the replies in this thread.
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  24. CanadianSteel

    CanadianSteel Well-Known Member

    4,076
    760
    Oct 24, 2011
    It is, but I believe it's based on FA loss and gain, not a player who's been cut.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  25. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    16,694
    4,886
    Nov 4, 2011
    That’s not correct. The net gains and losses are only counted during a specific period of time from the start of the free agency period until a point sometime during the summer. If a FA signed or lost is cut before - I think - Week 10, they are eliminated from the calculation. Signing a player who was cut never hurts you.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!