1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Jets Not Breaking the Bank for Le'Veon

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by mcam, Jan 31, 2019.

  1. mcam

    mcam Well-Known Member

    2,720
    547
    Feb 5, 2017
    https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/...-bank-to-sign-leveon-bell-away-from-steelers/

    Interesting many still go on the presumption that Bell could get more than the Steelers offered to him last year.

    We will see.

    The last reports were the Steelers were going to utilize the transition tag on Bell, making it so they can match any offer other teams make. In doing so, they'd still have exclusive rights to him until deciding not to match said offer of another team.


    So interesting and as crazy as it has been, as of right now neither Bell nor Brown are not playing for the Steelers next year.


    Stay tuned should be interesting. I'm going to bet that Bell won't be getting more than the Steelers offered him last year.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  2. GB_Steel

    GB_Steel Well-Known Member

    2,131
    117
    Oct 20, 2011
    At this point I hope we don’t use the transition tag on him. He isn’t coming back and I’d like to have the comp pick for him.

    I agree that his best contract would have been with Pittsburgh.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  3. NY STEELERFAN

    NY STEELERFAN Well-Known Member

    8,604
    1,333
    Dec 10, 2012
    I might be wrong but I don't remember any reports on what the Steelers said they were going to do with Bell. If I am right there are many articles about what they should do with him all of which are not from the Steeler organization.

    I was a Bell supporter, one of the few on here before the season and right now Bell can go find another team and don't ever come back. JMO
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. Smitch89

    Smitch89 Well-Known Member

    1,550
    323
    Sep 11, 2018
    Your right bell won't be on the Steelers next year. So why are we still talking about him
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  5. mcam

    mcam Well-Known Member

    2,720
    547
    Feb 5, 2017
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2019
  6. Jammasterc

    Jammasterc Well-Known Member

    14,880
    1,307
    Oct 26, 2011
    Because it’s Super Bowl week!
     
  7. Smitch89

    Smitch89 Well-Known Member

    1,550
    323
    Sep 11, 2018
    Fair enough. Of course the Steelers aren't anywhere near the super Bowl unless they bought a ticket so might as well talk about something I guess
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. mcam

    mcam Well-Known Member

    2,720
    547
    Feb 5, 2017
    https://steelersdepot.com/2019/01/r...-steelers-might-not-tag-bell-before-deadline/ << dated Jan 17,2019

    "It’s hard to know for sure which way the Steelers will go with Bell this offseason and while team president Art Rooney II did admit during a Wednesday interview with Bob Pompeani of KDKA that the organization does have the option of tagging the running back again this offseason should they so choose, he claimed a final decision has yet to be made on if that will happen.

    “Again, we haven’t made any decisions on Le’Veon whether we’ll do anything or not, Rooney said. That will be part of the offseason evaluation as time goes on."


    There is an older ones. There are others.

    https://www.profootballrumors.com/2018/11/steelers-expected-to-use-transition-tag-on-leveon-bell
     
  9. TuRnDoWnForWaTT

    TuRnDoWnForWaTT Well-Known Member

    8,150
    3,179
    Jan 1, 2018
    I will be really disappointed if the Steelers use the transition tag on Bell. There is no compensation associated with the transition tag. So to me, if the Steelers use the transition tag on him, that means they want him back. There is no other reason to use it unless you do. This is would send the wrong message to the team IMO.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. mcam

    mcam Well-Known Member

    2,720
    547
    Feb 5, 2017
    Yeah in the above article Rooney also states that he likes what we currently have at the position with Conner and Samuels. It is largely expected that Bell is gone, BUT the deadline to utilize a transition tag is mid March and if Brown is traded things could get interesting.
     
  11. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    16,021
    4,612
    Nov 4, 2011
    I hate the thought of using the transition tag on Bell. When free agency opens, we need to have cap space available to get a few pieces to improve our roster, and have fewer “must fill” needs come draft time. I’m not talking about big money, big name signings. I’m talking about sensible signings like a Shaq Barrett, or a John Brown if we lose AB. Players like that. Tying up $14 million while the transition tag game plays out is useless. Also, I think Bell’s bridge needs to burned for the benefit of the culture of the team. His situation is very different from AB’s, but having either (or both) of those guys return for 2019 may be worse for the team than getting a 3rd round 2020 comp pick for Bell, and whatever the best offer is for AB.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  12. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    42,373
    9,386
    Oct 16, 2011
  13. FootballAnalyst98

    FootballAnalyst98 Well-Known Member

    7,338
    504
    Jan 23, 2018
    He probably wont get more money overall I don't see that happening but I also didnt see him living out that entire 70 million contract with pitt. He will definitely get more than 10 million fully guaranteed though.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. GoalLine

    GoalLine

    2,532
    984
    Oct 16, 2011
    [​IMG]
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  15. NY STEELERFAN

    NY STEELERFAN Well-Known Member

    8,604
    1,333
    Dec 10, 2012
    It don't say they are gonna it says that's an option. I don't recall the Steelers saying anything on Bell I do recall just like you pointed out the options they have but nobody has said they were gonna.
     
  16. Big30

    Big30 Member

    22
    1
    Jan 8, 2019
    Bring bell back if they can he just wanted to get paid and he deserves the money I know they can get a deal done spend some money cause being cheap hasn’t gotten them anywhere
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 2
  17. SteelerGlenn

    SteelerGlenn

    20,688
    4,571
    Nov 24, 2011
    He had a chance at 14.5 million guaranteed last year turned it down.
    And that’s why that $10 million number has to be incorrect.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. 86WardsWay

    86WardsWay Well-Known Member

    16,999
    4,899
    Dec 27, 2012
    Bell made the most foolish move a professional football player could ever make last season when he declined a 70 million dollar contract in lieu of skipping a season while in the prime of his career as an NFL RB. I have no idea what terrible advice he was getting from his agent but there is no way he will come out ahead in the long run. If he's banking on a Rap career during or after his NFL life then that's one gigantic pipe dream as well. Funny thing is, the Steelers still hold the cards and can still stick it to him if the foolishly choose to do so as well. He's really backed himself into a corner on this one. Not many teams are going to break the bank for this high risk player. At least not for the money he's wishing for.
     
  19. 86WardsWay

    86WardsWay Well-Known Member

    16,999
    4,899
    Dec 27, 2012

    An out of shape, lazy, halfhearted Bell will not yield any positive results on for off the field or the Steelers in 2019. It's really a lose, lose situation at this point.
     
    Last edited: Feb 1, 2019
    • Agree Agree x 2
  20. BobbyBiz

    BobbyBiz Well-Known Member

    6,800
    816
    Nov 30, 2011
    $10M is a number that Bell lovers throw out there when trying to defend the indefensible. It's usually compared to Gurley's $45M "guaranteed" money to show how wrong the Steelers were and again to defend the indefensible. Comparing apples to apples, if Gurley's "guaranteed" number is $45M, then Bells "guaranteed" money is $33M. Or if Bell's "guaranteed" money is $10M, Gurley's "guaranteed" money is $23M. Both contracts are structured the same way. The lesser "guaranteed" money is their signing bonuses. The greater reflects if they are still on the roster in year 2 of their contracts, which both would have been. Lets also not forget that the Steelers offer preceded the Rams offer byu several weeks, so there wasn't a Gurley contract to compare to when they were negotiating with Bell, something else that Bell lovers conveniently omit.
     
    • Winner Winner x 4
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  21. BobbyBiz

    BobbyBiz Well-Known Member

    6,800
    816
    Nov 30, 2011
    There is a level of concern in the building about Bell's motivation if he lands a big payday.

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. I called this last fall. Other teams are watching.

    Bell's value =

    [​IMG]
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  22. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    42,373
    9,386
    Oct 16, 2011
    Bingo. Pay the man.

    Bell is a doofus. He has cost himself so much money throughout this whole ordeal.

    We’ll see if any GM is dumb enough to pay him what he is seeking now.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  23. Steel Hog

    Steel Hog Well-Known Member

    4,759
    1,289
    Dec 6, 2017
    Who?
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  24. Smitch89

    Smitch89 Well-Known Member

    1,550
    323
    Sep 11, 2018
    The fat rapper
     
  25. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    16,021
    4,612
    Nov 4, 2011
    It just occurred to me that if we are active in free agency in March (which I think we need to be to go all-in next year), we may get no comp pick for Bell. I still want to be active in free agency, and I still don’t want to tag Bell Abdul do that dance again, but it’s very possible that he walks w/o any draft pick compensation.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!