1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Shaq Lawson

Discussion in 'The Bill Nunn Draft Room' started by SteelCity_NB, Mar 20, 2016.

  1. SteelCity_NB

    SteelCity_NB Staff Member Mod Team

    5,418
    684
    Oct 23, 2011
    I know I know... most people cringe at the thought of taking another OLB in Round 1. In my opinion, Lawson looks like he us being undervalued by the scouting community.

    As much I advocate taking a CB or S in round 1, if Lawson is around at #25, I think it should be seriously considered. Few edge rushers played the run as well as Lawson and he still put up 12.5 sacks.

    He looks terrific at disengaging from blockers and getting to the ball carrier. His style of play reminds me of James a harrison, albeit completely different body types. By body type he is a bit closer to Lamarr Woodley.

    I'm still looking at the secondary, but if Lawson is there at #25, he may be too good to pass up.

    What say you?
     
  2. cajunyankee

    cajunyankee Well-Known Member

    4,123
    684
    Oct 27, 2011
    Shame on you for mentioning LW!!!!!!

    I feel the same way about Dodd who I think would be the perfect bookend to Dupree... Would give us a 4-3 look when needed and and could standup and drop of needed.

    Problem is it doesn't work out, the quality of CB drops off in the 2nd & 3rd rds more than the DL so CB 1st then DL 2nd ... As far as safety 4th rd talent isn't much different than 2nd & 3rd rd... In fact there isn't a safety I'd take in the 1st rd over the other talent.

    I do agree that OLB is a need with Harrison departing SOON and JJ not really living up to his billing. In fact ILB is getting thin with both Timmons & Williams entering into the end of their contracts. Ragland 1st RD anyone??

    Decisions decisions!!!!!

    Trade back from the 1st and trade up into the 4th/5th

    Cajun
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,788
    9,817
    Oct 16, 2011
    I'm open to any position outside of QB, RB and TE. My main thing with a 1st rd pick is to walk away with a dominant player. I don't feel any of the CBs that will be available to us then will fit that criteria. Right now, that player for me is Billings.

    If we take another OLB, I want someone who can get to the QB, Shaq seems more of a run stopper then a sack specialist. Wouldn't that just be JJ all over again? The only real flaw in JJ's game is getting to the QB.
     
  4. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    7,638
    1,763
    Sep 9, 2013
    Pass rusher is definitely in play. I guarantee if Lawson is around at 25 he will be at least considered. There really aren't any safeties I'd be okay with at 25, and there's no guarantee any of the corners worthy of pick 25 will still be available. If that's the case come draft day, I wouldn't be at all shocked to see us go with an edge rusher or a guy like Billings. We can't get locked in on a certain position. Let's see how the draft unfolds and take the best player still available to us come play DL 25.
     
  5. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    29,636
    6,027
    Oct 22, 2011
    whomever it is has to start. i don't want a pass rush specialist to only come in on passing downs. that guy would have to replace JJ or don't pick that spot. then we have to figure out what to do with JJ. we wouldn't have a 1st round backup i wouldn't think. now if we go OLB, then we go for a guy that can play on the edge or move inside if needed. (if shazier or timmons gets injured) maybe a guy like lee. this way i think it would be more justified getting that type of player that could give us a replacement or eventual starter at any LB'er spot. maybe lawson or dodd could be that guy at OLB and DE if tuitt or heyward goes down. i'm just not sure they are that versitile. :cool:
     
  6. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    32,714
    7,930
    Nov 14, 2011
    I think with them not re-signing McClendon and Big Dan not really a starter, if Billings is there at #25 that's their pick.
     
  7. turtle

    turtle

    8,542
    1,375
    Jan 14, 2015
    I just don't see Lawson as an OLB in our 3-4 base. He is much better suited for DE in our nickel/4-3 looks, which is good because we are moving toward that anyway. He shouldn't be asked to drop in coverage as an OLB. He should definitely be in consideration for our first rounder imo. He will improve the pass rush, he sets the edge well and is good in run support. The only stickler would be his options in the base defense. At 280 or whatever he weighs now, DE may not be an immediate option but with time and strength training it could happen down the road as a rotation.
     
  8. turtle

    turtle

    8,542
    1,375
    Jan 14, 2015
    I see Dodd in the same way as I see Lawson and would also consider him in the first. He is an older prospect and we know the Steelers usually don't go that way, but you never know. Could they both play OLB in a pinch, yes I'm sure, but they're much more suited for DE imo. Dupree had a lot more experience dropping into coverage at Kentucky.
     
  9. Dean

    Dean Well-Known Member

    1,166
    51
    Mar 1, 2016
    I totally understand what your saying. I've watched Lawson the entire year and you know I've dreamed of him in black & gold. Everyone knows what I want to do with our first round selection but I know exactly how you feel.
     
  10. Dean

    Dean Well-Known Member

    1,166
    51
    Mar 1, 2016
    Lawson seems like a brick wall against the run. The type of guy who could return us to our run defense stoutness of yester year.
     
  11. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    16,693
    4,886
    Nov 4, 2011
    When I watch Lawson, my eyes keep getting drawn to Dodd on the other side. I like both players quite a bit as 4-3 ends. As others have said, that's no longer a scheme problem for us being in a 4 man nickel front around 60% of the time. An advantage that I see in Dodd is the ability to line up as a 5 tech at times in our base 3 man front with his size and arm length. NFL.com's draft profile for Dodd compares him to Michael Bennett, and I can see the comparison. I think both guys will have nice pro careers. I just like Dodd a bit better. Lawson looks to me to be a bit lacking in his quickness and knee bend as an outside pass rusher, and he doesn't have the length to offset that. Folks who really like Both of these guys should have a look at Jonathan Bullard's film. He's like a cross between Dodd and Lawson. His position is pure 4-3 end who can drop inside on passing downs. I'm not sure where he'd fit for our defense, but I think he's going to be a very good player.
     
  12. Dean

    Dean Well-Known Member

    1,166
    51
    Mar 1, 2016
    Now you' ve got wanting to go back and watch more plays to focus on Dodd. LOL.

    But you think Lawson is lacking in quickness and technique? I see a guy who diagnosis plays and knows where the ball is going to be to make plays. I see plenty of quickness. Or is it anticipation? I'm not familiar with Bullard; going to have to do more homework because I'm definitely interested in doing something in the 3rd round to address the OLB/DL positions.
     
  13. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    16,693
    4,886
    Nov 4, 2011
    His technique looks fine. It's just quickness and flexibility (in terms of getting low under the tackle on the outside) that I see as deficiencies. He's great anchoring against the run, no doubt about that. However, when he rushes the passer he wins with effort, strength and leverage. That's great, and makes him worthy of a 1st round pick, but the best outside pass rushers in the NFL also have either the ability to get around the tackle with quickness and bend, or length to fight around the tackle and disrupt even if the tackle has position (which Dodd has). Also, when you watch Lawson and Dodd, I think you'll see that Dodd is usually off the ball quicker. He seems to have more first step burst. Also, watch how often Dodd gets involved on running plays away from him. He gets after the running back and can close off the cutback lane with his quickness and tenacity.

    I'm not saying that Lawson isn't a very good player. I'm just saying he's a certain type of player who may be a great run defender and adequate pass rusher, but I don't see a 10+ sack/year guy. I see potential 10+ sack/year upside in Dodd (and perhaps a bit more risk as well).

    One thing that I love about both guys is that they'll never give up on a play. They'll get the coverage sacks that lazier players leave on the table after they're initially blocked out of the play.
     
  14. Dean

    Dean Well-Known Member

    1,166
    51
    Mar 1, 2016
  15. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    15,577
    2,463
    Oct 26, 2011
    I guess I just don't see either as a fit for the PGH Steelers.
     
  16. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    29,636
    6,027
    Oct 22, 2011

    i think the old way of the blitzburgh 3-4 is going away quickly. these guys fit in the mold of the new sub package that we are transforming towards. not a true 4-3 but not a true 3-4 either. big guys that can run on the edges. big guys that can run not necessarily 300+lb'ers from the interior. fast ilb'ers that run like safeties and big good tackling corners at safety might be the new normal. :cool:
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    15,577
    2,463
    Oct 26, 2011
    I never said that these 2 ball players weren't good, can they drop back in coverage on a RB/TE?
     
  18. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    29,636
    6,027
    Oct 22, 2011
    they shouldn't be asked to do that in this defense. they are almost exclusively run stuffers and pass rushers. the rb's and te's are left to the ilb'ers and safeties. :cool:
     
  19. Dean

    Dean Well-Known Member

    1,166
    51
    Mar 1, 2016
    Not to mention Lawson is a pain bringer. :)
     
  20. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    15,577
    2,463
    Oct 26, 2011
    I think it is pretty hard to change a leopards spots.
     
  21. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    29,636
    6,027
    Oct 22, 2011
    it started before DL left and butler took over. the league has forced it. if they are going to pass 65% of the time, you better be able to play pass 65% of the time. :cool:
     
  22. Dean

    Dean Well-Known Member

    1,166
    51
    Mar 1, 2016
  23. Diamond

    Diamond Well-Known Member

    5,790
    469
    May 26, 2012

    I think the consensus is going to be in the secondary in this draft at least according to art rooney, I think a DT will be drafted after round 2 but probably not before then, I think the logical move to address the secondary would be a corner or a safety in round 1 and round 2, the window of opportunity for the steelers to win another lombardi is now, so we must fix the weakest link on this team to make it happen.........
     
  24. Dean

    Dean Well-Known Member

    1,166
    51
    Mar 1, 2016

    What your saying is logical; and that's what worries me. LOL. I'd still like for them to sign a veteran safety (Nelson) to help groom the youngins and also allow Mitchell to go down in the box and play SS some; which I think he's more suited for. Let Nelson and Mitchell start at the safety positions and because their veterans, they should be able to get on the chemistry faster then if there was a rookie safety starting.
     
  25. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    7,638
    1,763
    Sep 9, 2013
    I'd like for them to sign a vet safety too, but I don't think it's happening. Plus moving Mitchell to SS would worry me a bit because he has proven over his career that he is a much better FS in Carolina and here in the Burgh than he was a SS in Oakland. Maybe just playing for Oakland explains the struggles, but there's no doubt that the switch to FS in Carolina jump started his career.

    It's starting to look more and more like a SS and a CB early in the draft. Golden and the rookie compete for the starting job and the rookie corner sits until he's ready to contribute. Gay Cockrell and Golson will start at corner. It wouldn't even surprise me if Golson got a chance to start outside too. We don't have to wait much longer to find out tho. Less than a month away
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!