1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

2017 comp picks/Signings

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by NY STEELERFAN, Feb 16, 2016.

  1. darcrav

    darcrav Well-Known Member

    7,222
    420
    Jun 16, 2012
  2. NY STEELERFAN

    NY STEELERFAN Well-Known Member

    8,604
    1,333
    Dec 10, 2012
    Oh I have sat back long enough.......Peters came with a lot of baggage and after the Steelers who don't draft guys like that were burned by Rainey and Ta'am(sp) I am sure they weren't going to jump up to grab another guy with baggage especially in the 1st, that is not the Steeler way. Now forget the season Peters had and forget how he conducted himself, the Steelers only had what he done in the past to go on. Yeah I would love to have him, give my right nut for him but I wasn't a guy who said jump up for him back then.

    Now you have bashed Colbert a ton here in your 1st 40 posts but please point out to me another general manager who hits the draft 100%......waiting.......still waiting!!!!! I agree with the ignoring the CB position I am right there with you, but come on he has drafted defense in the 1st what 3 years in a row, he has some great finds in Beachum and Bryant to name a few. One more question why are you a Steeler fan, is it the rings???? You come on here and talk a lot on hate about the Steelers, are you a fan?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,657
    10,208
    Oct 16, 2011
    How much would you have given up for Peters? Maybe the price was too steep or maybe with his baggage, he was never on the Steelers radar. The fact is, we don't know what goes on behind the scenes and moving up takes two teams, not as simple as just saying lets move up.

    As far as Maxx goes, I don't believe he was our target so I doubt the Ravens duped Colbert but even if they did, why would that bother you, you're on record as saying its a waste to take a TE in the first with our other needs. Our priorities haven't changed from a year ago, defense still needs more work then offense.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  4. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    17,065
    5,042
    Nov 4, 2011
    I
    I think expecting a drafting run like that is a stretch. We've done well; certainly better than more than 1/2 of the teams in the league. I would argue that we did as well as Seattle in the '98 - '03 tim frame (or thereabouts), with the exception of getting a franchise QB in the 3rd round (which is always more luck than ability, otherwise you'd take him the first if you know he's a franchise guy).

    I fully agree with passing on Peters for reasons others have stated. He played well this season, but we'll see if his baggage rears its head again. A good rookie season does not make for a good career. Also, I don't buy the whole "duped by the Ravens" thing regarding Maxx Williams. I doubt he was our target.

    I get that you're frustrated that we haven't drafted a good corner in recent years. I am too. We need help at the position, and our track record of filling that hole in the draft or free agency has been pretty bad recently. However, I think you go overboard by suggesting that we be irresponsible and just get a corner in the 1st no matter what. If you draft exclusively by need and pass on better players, you hurt the team. Need plays a role, but player quality (on and off field) needs to trump all. There's a word for teams that draft irresponsibly. That word is "Browns."
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. Dean

    Dean Well-Known Member

    1,166
    51
    Mar 1, 2016
    I'm not being irresponsible at all if you look at how the drafts shaping up. We have a good group of cornerbacks coming out this year. And we NEED a cornerback or two. We all know that cornerback is a premium position in this league and teams jump on good ones when there available. We will be in a good position to get one. Possibly Apple. But definitely in the range of Willie Jackson of Houston Cougars.

    There is absolutely no SUCH THING as taking a guy too early as long as the guy pans out. If we take Wilie Jackson at # 25 and he pans out to have a rookie season like Peters (for example) who's to say we took him too early? It's not like hes' going to be there for us in the second round.

    And this BPA type of drafting is good if your a sorry team that needs a lot. That' is not the case with us. Let me be specific: WE ARE NOT GOING TO ANY SUPERBOWLS WITH THE CURRENT CROP OF SECONDARY TALENT THAT WE HAVE! And.........that means we are wasting the remaining self life of Ben who doesn't have many good seasons left.


    We need secondary help more then anything. And when your needs are down to only two or three areas, you attack those areas. When you have a flat tire, you don't go to Riley's auto care and get the best windshield whipper because that was the most accessible thing to get. You get a new tire or the car doesn't go! BPA is good for teams that have needs in a ton of areas. We are not far off from being in the Super Bowl.
     
  6. Dean

    Dean Well-Known Member

    1,166
    51
    Mar 1, 2016
    And if you look at the abysmal way that Colbert has gone about filling the needs in the secondary, it's alarming. Just go and focus in on how we've done the secondary the last 4 years. They guy doesn't take those positions seriously while the rest of the league puts a premium on talented cornerbacks. I've every reason to want to go strong in the draft on the secondary in the first two rounds.

    Talent wise, our secondary is easily in the bottom three of the least talented teams in the league in the secondary.


    Look at the mocks. Willie Jackson is a first round worthy cornerback. I'd be elated if we selected him.
     
  7. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    17,065
    5,042
    Nov 4, 2011
    A few years ago we NEEDED an edge rusher, and grabbed Jarvis Jones with our 1st round pick. I raised a red caution flag on Jones' film a few weeks before the draft. An argument can be made that we forced the Jones pick to fill a need, and here we are a few years later still needing to fill that role on the team. I agree with you that we have a spotty history drafting secondary talent, but saying draft a corner in the 1st NO MATTER WHAT is not going to fix the situation. He has to be worth the pick, AND in our case he needs to be able to contribute right away. Better to get a really good player at another position than a lesser player at corner. The guy doesn't need to be the BPA, but he can't be graded far below the BPA either. There's a point where need and near-BPA can intersect, and that's when it's OK to move down the board a bit and pass on a higher grades player. If you simply target need and zone in on one position no matter what, you leave higher graded players to the other teams. They get better, and you don't. That's my point.

    I hope a worthy corner or edge guy is there at #25, but if not we should either trade down or go with another position.
     
  8. Dean

    Dean Well-Known Member

    1,166
    51
    Mar 1, 2016
    There is no such thing as "worth the pick". If you draft a guy (no matter where you draft him) and he pans out to be a good starter, it was a good pick. Period. Eli Apple and Willie Jackson are both worthy of our first round pick. I don't care if Jackson is suppose to be a top 45 draft pick. As long as he can come in, upgrade the play at that position, then it was a good pick.

    If you have a good talent evaluator (which Colbert is suppose to be :rolleyes:) then your perception and ideas of who's good in the first couple of rounds and who's bad will be a little different then others. Our secondary play is keeping this team from reaching it's ultimate goal. Let's be specific here.

    After what Jackson and Eli Apple did at the combine; plus what they've don on game tape, there is little doubt they are both "worthy" of our pick.
     
  9. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    7,847
    1,845
    Sep 9, 2013
    I tried to hate on Colbert, but then I looked at our roster and how it's full of talent drafted by the steelers. We haven't really hit on any recent secondary players (which is why we have an issue at that spot), but our entire high powered offense was drafted by us (minus Foster who was UDFA) and our entire Starting front 7 was as well (assuming Dupree as the starter not Moats). We've drafted really good depth too at ILB (Spence, Williams) S (Golden).

    Basically I think Colbert has done a really nice job drafting our roster... We just need to hit on a secondary player or two in the upcoming draft and FA period
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  10. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    17,065
    5,042
    Nov 4, 2011
    Yep. I've also had frustration with aspects of our roster, and certain draft selections (Dri Archer anyone? :beathorse:), but when I go back and look at the overall body of work, it's certainly in the upper 3rd of NFL teams. Saying "really nice" maybe a bit strong, but definitely solid.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. Dean

    Dean Well-Known Member

    1,166
    51
    Mar 1, 2016
    I see your point. But Jarvis Jones was red flagged the last two weeks before the draft and Colbert just ran up there to take him when everyone else was starting to say Jones wasn't the real deal after all. Which is why he was on the board when we took him.

    For this year, because of the talent at the position, there will be first round worthy talent when we pick. So if we take Eli Apple or Jackson, both are first round talents. That's what I'm saying.

    Again....................there is no such thing as "worth the pick". As long as that player pans out, he's worth the pick. Period. We constantly, constantly, constantly get burned when our cornerbacks are not able to go man on man. Playing zone all the time doesn't cut it when you have quarterbacks like Brady and Rodgers who spread you out. We have to have cornerbacks who have the talent to cover man on man.

    We we face the best QB's, we have to be able to compete man on man in the secondary.

    The William Gays of the world are not what you want on the corner when going up against Brady and the like.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    17,065
    5,042
    Nov 4, 2011
    Ok, let me ask you this. Setting aside your view on Jackson specifically, would you be ok drafting a corner at pick #25 who may be really solid in 2017, but won't give us much more in 2016 than our current corners? Also, would you take that guy and pass on a defensive lineman or edge rusher who you think can impact immediately and also be very good in the long run? As you've said before, we're a contender now. I agree. I want to feel that the guy we get at pick #25 will help us in 2016 at least as much as Dupree did last season. The only way I would relax that standard is if I feel that a guy will be great down the road (not just good).

    I would agree with you that Jackson shows potential, and I think he could be a decent starter by 2017. I've also watched 5 of his games recently, and I see significant flaws in his game that I expect will take at least a year of NFL coaching to work through. I don't think he's ready. I also don't think he's ever going to be great, just good. That's why I give him a 2nd round grade. I'll explain more when I finish and post my review of corners available in the draft. You and I clearly disagree on him, and that's fine. NFL teams often disagree significantly in their player evaluations.

    Apple may be worth pick #25. I hate his tackling and inability to shed blocks, but he is really sticky in downfield coverage. I think his 2016 impact may be limited, but his potential is pretty significant IMO. I will probably have a low 1st round grade on him overall.
     
  13. Dean

    Dean Well-Known Member

    1,166
    51
    Mar 1, 2016

    Setting aside Jackson or Apple, we shouldn't take a corner in the first round then because after that, the next 5 corners in the draft are generally the same and can be taken in the second round. And I hear what your saying in regard to thinking Jackson is a second round talent. I think he's first round but regardless, he's a better talented corner then anything we have now. And has the potential to be our best man on man corner since Woodson.

    I think Jackson can help us right now, this season. I watched the Cougars bowl game and he was outstanding in coverage and the limited tackling that he had to do. Now could Lodis McKelvin come in and give us bigger one year pop then Jackson? Probably. But at some point we have to stop trying to go the bargain basement direction with this position.

    And what I'm seeing from the fans is a total disregard of the cornerback position in our defense. And management has that attitude too. And it's why we are stuck in neutral every time we run into the Bradys/Rodgers of the league. Because when we get spread out, we can't handle man on man coverage well.

    No can that be helped by an awsome, awsome, pass rush? Sure! But this draft is full of defensive prospect guys on the line. We can get one in the second round if need be.
     
    Last edited: Mar 8, 2016
  14. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    17,065
    5,042
    Nov 4, 2011
    I'm not saying we shouldn't take a corner in the 1st round. I'm saying we shouldn't reach for a corner in the 1st round, and leave a player that we think is significantly better on the board. I want at least 1 corner from this draft, but I see guys as good or better than Jackson who are not getting the press (yet). Go watch DJ White's games on draftbreakdown.com. I haven't watched enough yet to come up with my grade, but I know that I like his play at least as much as Jackson's based on what I've seen of both guys so far.
     
  15. NY STEELERFAN

    NY STEELERFAN Well-Known Member

    8,604
    1,333
    Dec 10, 2012
    I agree some of these 2-4 round guys have some great value. Harlan Miller is my favorite but I also like what I saw from Sean Davis, Cyrus Jones, Artie Burns, Xavien Howard and James Bradberry.
     
  16. Dean

    Dean Well-Known Member

    1,166
    51
    Mar 1, 2016
    I hear what you guys are saying. But we've got to add some real talent in that secondary. I'm tired of the business as usual way we've been addressing the secondary the last 4 years. If we could sign McKelvin and then draft a talented kid, then I'm totally satisfied. I'm not hard to please; I just want that secondary address in a somewhat serious manner.

    Can you imagine what some ball hawking talent can do in that secondary with the way Butler had the front 7 attacking last season?

    I'm salivating thinking about it.
     
  17. defva

    defva Well-Known Member

    6,110
    642
    Oct 19, 2011
  18. Dean

    Dean Well-Known Member

    1,166
    51
    Mar 1, 2016
    Because I want the defense to cause more turnovers.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!