1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Can someone explain the dez catch

Discussion in 'General NFL Talk' started by bigbenhotness, Jan 11, 2015.

  1. bigbenhotness

    bigbenhotness Well-Known Member

    21,658
    3,392
    Nov 1, 2014
    Was it a catch? Rigged game?
     
  2. strummerfan

    strummerfan Well-Known Member

    18,526
    3,787
    May 9, 2012
    oh good lord


    #cryingoverlostbet
     
  3. TerribleTowelFlying

    TerribleTowelFlying Staff Member Site Admin Mod Team

    23,310
    2,338
    Oct 12, 2011
    [tweet]554387681015107584[/tweet]
     
  4. Da Stellars

    Da Stellars Well-Known Member

    8,377
    1,111
    Oct 22, 2011
    He went to the ground, he didn't make a football move. It is kind of a bogus rule, he did take 3 steps, how many do you need for a "football move"? It's one of those things where you'll know it when you see it... Which is a gray area.
     
  5. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,868
    10,319
    Oct 16, 2011
    Karma for the Detroit fiasco.

    Only saw one replay as I didn't see it live but didn't look as if he ever caught it. Almost an amazing catch, almost.
     
  6. bigbenhotness

    bigbenhotness Well-Known Member

    21,658
    3,392
    Nov 1, 2014
    I'm not crying, my brother wanted to know lol. f dallas
     
  7. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    It was a catch if you're using the literal definition of the word catch, just not NFL's definition of a catch. With that type of a catch, where he's coming down from about 12 feet up and stretching for the end zone, it is absolutely impossible to hit the ground and not have the ball move. There's simply no way a human being could prevent that ball from moving. Like everything though, the NFL's rules are so ticky tacky. It was the right call, just a stupid rule
     
  8. steel1031

    steel1031 Well-Known Member

    3,825
    239
    Oct 16, 2011
    it happened with hines a couple of times I can remember. rule sux but its the rule
     
  9. bigbenhotness

    bigbenhotness Well-Known Member

    21,658
    3,392
    Nov 1, 2014
    Still don't understand it but that's funny. Karma
     
  10. SteelerJJ

    SteelerJJ Well-Known Member

    8,432
    502
    Oct 16, 2011
    Dumb rule and the same type of rule that took Polamalu's INT away against the Colts back in the day.
     
  11. Lizard72

    Lizard72

    21,931
    1,868
    Oct 23, 2011
    AND......If you also remembered the NFL came out and issued an apology about getting wrong!

    I've seen that play from all the angles and it looks like he had that ball and came down with at least three steps. He lunged with possession of the ball and you can see his right forearm came down before the ball hit. Ball hits, moves a little, but as he's rolling over he tries to re-grip (still in the field of play) and loses his grip but manages to hold onto it.

    The problem is defining when his "catch" became a complete catch. If he doesn't lunge and takes a step out of bounds its a catch. He lunges and apparently they have determined that constitutes the act of still catching the ball.....
     
  12. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    #hashtagsarestupid LOL.
     
  13. 58stillers

    58stillers

    2,188
    284
    Nov 14, 2011
    I thought it was an absurd rule when they implemented it around Calvan Johnson's non-catch. The rule making has gotten so nit picky. Of course I'm old school, when the ground cannot force a fumble mentality. Plus it potentially cost me point in my fantasy league.... I needed a Dez score to keep up with the Brady's.
     
  14. Myronwemissyinz

    Myronwemissyinz

    3,055
    12
    Oct 17, 2011
    The wife asked me after the catch was challenged what I thought. I had a few dollars on the Pack and HATE the Cowboys :emperor:. My response was "If that were a STEELER receiver I want that catch! In this game I hope they reverse it."

    Came down with the ball took three steps and stretched arm toward goal line. What other "football moves" does a player need to make?
     
  15. Ray D

    Ray D Staff Member Mod Team

    11,092
    2,315
    Oct 18, 2011
    By rule, not a catch. But the rule sucks.

    Much like the (now defunct) "tuck rule," it undermines the spirit of what football should be about. By the spirit of what a fumble is supposed to be, it's a fumble. But a weird little "splitting hairs" rule negates that.

    Reminds me of Jerramy Stevens' fumble that wasn't in SB XL. He caught the ball. Turned upfield. Took 3 full steps. Got hit and lost the ball. Ruled incomplete. By rule, maybe it was... depending on your interpretation of the rules. But in spirit, that damned sure was a fumble.

    The rules need to be simplified and less open to interpretation. That's half the problem today.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!