1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Question about our coordinators.

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Spartacus, Jan 2, 2015.

  1. strummerfan

    strummerfan Well-Known Member

    18,085
    3,649
    May 9, 2012
    Mendy and FWP are better than Bell? Ward is better than Brown? Really?

    Yeah, he lost. But his quarterback managed to throw for 4 times as many yards and 1/3 the interceptions. Which should be impossible since according to you Arians is stupid and Haley is a genius.
     
  2. Diamond

    Diamond Well-Known Member

    5,790
    469
    May 26, 2012
    Arians should have his initials changed from BA to BS, he blew so much smoke up these fans rears he had them believing he was going to be the 1 seed through out the playoffs even after he lost his starting QB and the backup: After all of his bragging he went on to lose 4 of his last six games to the likes of the falcons niners and is now a wildcard playing a 7 win panther team which is favored by 6 1/2 points over his 11-5 team, I thought Buddy Ryan was the biggest BSer to coach the cards, but I think BA has out done him....
     
  3. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    Yeah, BA is going to show the world he's not a good coach. He's relying on a great defence, but that won't last forever. His offensive woes will keep him from going far in the playoffs, and will likely eventually keep him out of the playoffs. The true BA will show his true colours soon.
     
  4. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,663
    10,210
    Oct 16, 2011
    Actually, you are twisting things around because thats what you do. Having plenty of holes to hit doesn't mean having a hole there right away every time he touches the ball. I'm also not saying that Bell never creates something from nothing, there's a reason he has more yards after contact then anyone else. But saying the line has done nothing to aid Bell is just silly. Denying Munch has made a huge impact is even more silly.
     
  5. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    Nobody said the line has done nothing. Now you're the one spinning things. All I'm saying is the Oline is still weaker than most people think. Bell has made a lot out of nothing, but despite his talent, he has 7 games with a ypc under 4. That is significant and it shows that we don't run the ball all that well. With weapons like Brown, Bryant, Heath and Wheaton, on top of the receiving skill of Bell, there's no way in hell he should have that many games with poor rushing numbers. It shows a lack of good blocking from the Oline. We've seen some improvement, but not as much as some think. If you want to put all that improvement on Munchak and none on Bell, fine, but the little improvement we've seen still isn't nearly good enough
     
  6. strummerfan

    strummerfan Well-Known Member

    18,085
    3,649
    May 9, 2012
    So if the Steelers lose tonight with a franchise qb does that mean that we've seen Haley's true colors?

    Wait, I know the answer to that already. Several of you will be whining about how Tomlin didn't have the Steelers prepared.
     
  7. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    I think it shows more about Tomlin than Haley. I really don't care if Haley stays or goes, other than wanting to retain the offensive system and not start all over. I have no allegiance to Haley, I just think he's a far better playcaller than BA ever was.
     
  8. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,663
    10,210
    Oct 16, 2011
    You wrote:

    Yeah, not a whole lot of spinning going on that entire statement, especially about no holes being opened up.

    As for the 7 games with under 4 ypc stat, what teams did they come against? Did any of them have good run defense? I'm sure that needs to be taken into account. Also at what stage of the season? Obviously the line has been a work in progress, Munch wasn't going to come in from day one and wave a wand and everything would be fixed, there is still improvement to be made but he's done a heck of a job so far.
     
  9. strummerfan

    strummerfan Well-Known Member

    18,085
    3,649
    May 9, 2012
    You forgot one important question. What did the defense do schematically. Did they sell out to stop the run?
     
  10. Diamond

    Diamond Well-Known Member

    5,790
    469
    May 26, 2012
    Even his defense has went off the rails in his last two games giving up over 200 yards rushing in each game, today if they don't stop the panthers strong running game it's turn out the lights, and I don't expect them to win this game.....
     
  11. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    Oh come on Blast, when I said no holes to run through, I clearly didn't mean absolutely 0 holes to run through all season long. Surely you didn't think I was being literal when I used the word no. Of course Bell did create all his rushing yards all on his own. I didn't expect anyone to take that statement so literally.

    As for your question. Those 7 games are throughout the season, with 3 of them coming in our last 3 games. I'll use Baltimore for example, since they have a far less talented RB (and it's not even close), but I think they run the ball quite well, plus they basically had the same schedule as us. These are the teams Bell had under 4 YPC against and I'll also list Forsett's numbers for comparison.

    Tampa - Forsett 7.93 ypc
    Indy - Forsett 7 ypc
    NYJ - Baltimore didn't play them
    Baltimore - Obviously can't compare this one
    Atlanta - Forsett 4.13 ypc
    KC - Baltimore didn't play them
    Cinci - Forsett 6.36 ypc and 4 ypc for both games

    We're not getting very good blocking from our Oline and I think our inconsistent rushing numbers prove this. I also know what I see with my own eyes, our Oline is still a weak point
     
  12. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    Mr. Potato Head! LOL!!!!!!!!!! Dude, I don't care HOW people feel about BA that's really funny! If he were to be a toy his accessories would be a a bubble screen and an empty backfield on 3rd and inches. LOL!
     
  13. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    Yes. It was when he was the WR coach in 06. I put that SQUARELY on BA. LOL! We did go 9-7 with him though as OC.
     
  14. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    Our d has laid some eggs against some pedestrian offenses as well. So if we don't score a lot it's on Haley but if we give up game winning touchdowns against teams that wind up with 2 or 3 wins that is also on Haley? But when BA was here and we had a truly elite d that held teams to low scores consistently, created turnovers, had pick 6's, fumbles returned for tds, that is because of BA's scheme? LOL. I'm confused.
     
  15. Jim90

    Jim90 Well-Known Member

    2,822
    273
    Oct 18, 2011
    Like I said before when the 2 OC's first took over, BA 2007, Haley 2012, BA had the better players. When Haley came in Bell wasn't here and Mendy was on his way out. I wasn't comparing Ward to Brown like you are , the more fair comparison would be Holmes vs Brown, and Holmes was the better player for BA. ( for 2007, than Brown was for Haley 2012)

    BA had a 9-7 record here too, that's close enough to 8-8. So Haley had 1 more bad season than BA, and Haley didn't have a D to bail him out like BA did. If BA started out with the same D as Haley did, BA would've been long gone.
     
  16. Jim90

    Jim90 Well-Known Member

    2,822
    273
    Oct 18, 2011
    I would blame Lebeau and Tomlin for putting Troy back in
     
  17. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    17,067
    5,043
    Nov 4, 2011
    I never mentioned the defense. The defense has been the weaker unit all season, and if we simply had an average NFL defense for weeks 1-13 our team may be 13-3 and watching the wild card round on TV. My point is that - as good as the offense has been - it has had some puzzling funks. The Jet game was absurd. The first 3 quarters against a bad Saints defense was awful. The 2nd Browns game was a debacle. My point is that great offenses like ours (#2 in yards, #7 in scoring, #2 time of possession) don't typically have prolonged struggles like what we've seen at times this season, particularly against questionable defenses. I hope we're over that, because the offense needs to be very solid for this team to make a deep run into the playoffs. I think we're over it because the offense has done a very solid job for a few weeks running. Tonight we face the #8 overall defense. We need to be on.
     
  18. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    Yeah I was just making a more general statement about how losing has been as much of a "team effort" this year as winning has. I was just saying by the logic that has been used in these coordinator threads it seems you would also have to say that in the games where we played bad defensively you would have to blame it on DL if it's Haley or BA's fault when we play bad offensively. Or when we ran the ball good some might say that it was because of Munch but if we ran it bad some still seem to JUST be blaming Haley for that. I was just trying to bring out the fact that it's a total team effort one way or the other and when we win there's no one guy that gets the credit and when we lose there's no one guy that gets the blame. If that makes any sense. LOL.
     
  19. Jim90

    Jim90 Well-Known Member

    2,822
    273
    Oct 18, 2011
    You could put a lot of the blame on Ben for offense if he isn't on his game,, Haley isn't the one throwing int's into triple coverage, or throwing the ball over the receivers heads or throwing them to the bugs on the field.
     
  20. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,663
    10,210
    Oct 16, 2011
    I know you weren't being literal but taken in context with the rest of the statement, you clearly feel the line has very little to do with Bells success, that's the point I was trying to make.

    I don't think those stats paint a clear picture, as Strummer said, you dont know what the defenses were keying on, given that 3 of those games were recent, and Bell had been tearing it up, its a fair bet they were selling out to stop the run. You also have to take in account what our offense was trying to do. In our last game, they all but abandoned the run, it was so glaring I even made a comment about it in the game thread. I dont know if it was to get Ben the record or what but they just stopped running.

    Our eyes see different things because to me, the line is much improved but I agree that its not a finished product but I never expected it to be a quick transition. After watching years of garbage at that position, it is much better this year.

    Lastly, and as to the point of this whole thread, Munch is regarded as the best line coach in the business, Haley is not thought of as the best OC, he'd probably be somewhere in the middle or wherever you want to put him but he clearly isn't the best OC. Therefore IMO, it would be harder to replace Munch than Haley.
     
  21. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    Apples to oranges though. You're talking about a completely new offence, with new route trees, new play calls, new protection packages, new terminology, a whole new playbook, etc. That's a big deal and not to be taken lightly. Munch may very well be the best line coach in the NFL, but replacing a line coach doesn't involve any of those things I just listed. Our entire offensive identity is a result of our OC. A new OC can result in a whole new identity.

    As I said, Bill Belichek could be our line coach and I would much rather find a new line coach than a new OC, if I had to pick one. It's just easier to replace a line coach than an OC, regardless of who they are
     
  22. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011
    Agree 100%! They BOTH deserve credit. It just continues to amaze me that people want to discount what Haley has done with our offense this season.
     
  23. TerribleTowelFlying

    TerribleTowelFlying Staff Member Site Admin Mod Team

    23,297
    2,332
    Oct 12, 2011
    I don't see a lot of that. He deserves some credit for sure, but this offense is loaded with talent. I'm more amazed by people who make him out to be an offensive genius. Not quite as amazing as people who blame all of the team's problems on Mike Tomlin, but amazing nonetheless.
     
  24. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    I guess I'm extra amazing then because I fit into both camps. lol

    Actually that's not really true. I don't think Haley is a genius, although when my dog took a dump on my pillow the other night, I am pretty sure it was because of Mike Tomlin.
     
  25. TerribleTowelFlying

    TerribleTowelFlying Staff Member Site Admin Mod Team

    23,297
    2,332
    Oct 12, 2011
    Oh wow, that sucks. :lolol:
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!