1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Cajun's state of the Steelers, you won't like it!

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by cajunyankee, Dec 6, 2014.

  1. Jim90

    Jim90 Well-Known Member

    2,822
    273
    Oct 18, 2011
    Being right against the salary cap hasn't helped things either, all we can afford are the scabs that nobody else wants.
     
  2. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011
    Remember how everyone thought Colbert was a genius when Cowher was coaching the players that he drafted and signed as free agents? Hmmm?
     
  3. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    17,003
    5,010
    Nov 4, 2011
    I agree about 75% with the original post. I'm going to get lambasted for this by some, but I think culprit #1 for our struggles is a living legend that we all love for good reason - Dick LeBeau. In my view, his defensive scheme simply does not fit the new CBA. In the past, we could afford to develop young talent because we had rights to them for 6 years - plenty of time to know who to pay big dollars to and who to let move on to greener pastures. That also allowed for more time with veteran players before the young guys had to be ready.

    If you look at the best defenses in the NFL, they pretty much all get immediate contributions from young players. They don't need to allow their talented rookies 2-4 years to understand the scheme and develop into productive players. As an example, look at the impact that San Fran got from Aldon Smith and Eric Reid as rookies. They were both put into situations where they were able to do what they did well without being hampered by a complex system that made them think too much. We've also have difficulty getting free agents to come in and play consistently well early on on the defensive side. Honestly, the only guys that I can think of under LeBeau are Farrior, Von Oelhoffen and Ryan Clark - all of whom were among the more cerebral players at their positions in recent years. Most of the time, we just get role players or resign former Steelers players who already understand the scheme. To me it's pretty clear that Mitchell has played confused for much of the season, and that has led to missed assignments. I've complained about him quite a bit this year, but part of me has to wonder if he's just thinking too much because of the scheme. Maybe he would be able to perform up to his physical talent level in a simpler scheme. Our defense is too much about scheme, and not enough about putting the most talented defenders into a position to be successful doing what they do best.


    Also, I think that our base scheme is not well suited to defending today's evolving offensive schemes. Simply put, it's been solved by opposing OCs. It's no longer great QBs like Brady and Brees that beat us. Young QBs no longer have to dread facing our defense as long as they have a decent OC who can plan for the holes in our scheme. I also find it alarming just how badly we defend the outside zone - it's really scary, almost like the outside zone was tailor made to beat our 2 gapping run defense. I absolutely LOVE DL for what he did for this franchise over the past several years, but it's just not working anymore.
     
  4. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    I think Tomlin has some say for sure. If you notice in his midweek pressers he will often mention an opposing player that he feels they need to keep an eye on and will talk about how he watched them on their pro day. It's gotta make you wonder if they were so impressive why in the crap did WE not draft them? LOL!
     
  5. Thigpen82

    Thigpen82 Bitter optimist

    10,523
    1,534
    Oct 17, 2011
    Aye. We all know how Tomlin operates. The media is a game for him. That has no relationship to his coaching ability, whether it's good or bad.

    The problem I have with Cajun's post is that it doesn't really cover the good spots on the team, and it doesn't break this stuff down into details. As much as some people want it to be "all on the coaches" or "all on Tomlin" or whatever, each problem the team has is complex. Like I said in another thread, we're inconsistently inconsistent. There are a ton of variables at work with each issue. That's not to water down their seriousness, or give anyone a free pass. It's just to call it as it is.

    The one exception to all of that is Mike Mitchell. He just needs to go.
     
  6. cajunyankee

    cajunyankee Well-Known Member

    4,135
    686
    Oct 27, 2011
    You're right Thig, not very positive mentioned nor breakdowns. I didn't want to write a small book and really thought most of that would get covered in the debates to follow.

    To my defense some I did say we'll go where Ben takes us, good & Bad, and that we have to great weapons in Bell & AB. I will say Munchak has our OL finally playing some good football in the trenches and Haley contrary to many fans has this offense rolling. We're ranked #2 barely behind the colts. We have a balanced and potent attack. He has Ben reading defenses better and Ben is getting rid of the ball much quicker. He's benched the Archer experiment and is bringing M. Bryant along at the right pace. He's still a couple years away from being that true pro-bowl weapon but he has the raw talent. Still needs to run better rtes. He rounds off his cuts instead of planting and making the hard quick cut, that'll come in time.

    Blast- I'm not a flower kind of guy..LOL... but to your points.... No way was Art ll concerned about arians saving face. In this league you're fired, move on. No way would I ever want Kahn as a GM. He's a numbers guy type of executive and not a talent evaluator. I'd go after some-one from Greenbay like Mike Eayrs or the Seahawks Scott Fitterer.

    See the Lake thread to view my Lake concerns.

    Elvis- I so agree about LeBeau. I love the coach. He has always struggled with being determined to stay the course and not be very flexible when opposing OC discover cracks in his armor and devise schemes to defeat them. His defense is so complicated it requires disciplined veterans. Shazier has ALL the talent in the world but seemed so lost most of the time. In order for his defense to work a dominate NT is needed. He hasn't had that. Effective pass rushing OLBers are needed, nope, that's gone too. ILbers who can stop the run and cover the TE. Only had 1 of those. CB's who'll keep the WR in front, make the tackle and doesn't get beat deep.....Nope, in-effective CBs/ best we have is now Gay. Safeties who can stop the run- Troy doesn't tackle very well and a FS to protect being beat deep...........WHERE'S Mike M????????????

    Our defense is ranked 16th and doesn't pressure the QB very well. While all is not lost if our offense can't outscore opposing teams odds are we'll lose. I don't see this defense saving the day. Looking at this defense our LBers are better suited for the 4-3. Only exception is Worilds who is on a 1 yr deal and due to mis-management his next contract with us will cost us an avg yearly salary between 9-10 mil. He isn't worth that so we may loose him. Tight against the cap and Ben being given a HUGE extension will hurt. Our DL isn't designed for a 4-3 set up so we're stuck between base schemes. I feel it would be better having our DL play 4-3 instead of our LBers play 3-4. But who am I???

    Cajun-
     
  7. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    33,606
    8,232
    Nov 14, 2011
    Has many of the players that left the Steelers gone onto a different team and become a great player? The coaching staff has developed good players on offense just not on defense, AB, Bell, Pouncey, DeCastro and even Beachum.
     
  8. Thigpen82

    Thigpen82 Bitter optimist

    10,523
    1,534
    Oct 17, 2011
    For sure, I imagined as much. I agree with your assessment of the positives.

    Also agree on a later point - I'm increasingly thinking that the poor safety play is the number one problem for the D this year. I know others say it's the line, but the safeties are constantly caught out of position, and if you're getting burned on big plays, those are the guys I'm looking to for reasons why.
     
  9. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    17,003
    5,010
    Nov 4, 2011
    Cajun,
    With respect to our D line, I think we'd be solid inside as a 4-3 team with McClendon and Tuitt. I kind of think of those guys as having as much 1 gap skills as 2 gap skills. I think they could be similar to Brockers and Langford in St. Louis - not quite as good mind you, but similar in style, and probably pretty effective. I'm not sure where Heyward would fit in. Maybe he'd be one of the inside guys as well, or if he could drop 15 lbs maybe he could be a solid strong side DE in a 4-3. That would be 3/4th of a respectable run stopping 4 man front. However, what's missing both from a 4-3 perspective and our current 3-4 scheme is the outside pass rush. The guys we have now are much better suited to rushing as 3-4 OLBs than they would be rushing from a 3 point stance against OTs who know they're coming.

    At LB, I think Shazier may be an ideal weak side OLB in a 4-3. His speed would be great in pursuit, blitzing and pass coverage, and we'd be able to let him freelance a bit off the weak side. I also think JJ could adjust to the strong OLB position in a 4-3. Timmons should be able to play MLB in any scheme other than a Tampa 2 (and I would not advocate for a Tampa 2). Spence could back up the weak side and/or middle.

    I'm not advocating a shift to a 4-3 anytime soon, but I don't necessarily think it would make us worse in the front 7 - provided that we find a couple of outside pass rushers - maybe a free agent and a draft pick. Anyway, that's all just spur of the moment musing. It's not going to happen.
     
  10. cajunyankee

    cajunyankee Well-Known Member

    4,135
    686
    Oct 27, 2011
    Yeah, its not going to happen any time soon. We have the perfect set of LBers for the 4-3. We are going to lose worilds ( our only 3-4 pass rushing OLB ) and JJ is NOT the answer to James Harrison @ ROLB. Moats is getting better in that role but he's a true NFL 4-3 OLB. Vince is the perfect run stuffing "Mike". Spence is a very solid Mike type guy with more speed than Vince. Both have solid instincts ( reads ) with maybe Spence being a bit ahead. Timmons & Shazier could be real solid Weak & strong side OLBers. We could have the deepest and best set of LBers in the 4-3 scheme in the NFL.

    Our DL...???? Agree our DT's would be strong. Move McCullers and McLendon to 1-Tech and Tuitt at the 3-tech. Heyward, Has pass rushing skills but as you noted is not the typical size for the 4-3 DE as he's a bit thicker. I would not ask him to trim down but instead as you advocate move him to the strong side DE as is. He could better handle the coming double team, handle the run better and even pressure the QB while not having the typical speed of a 4-3 DE. In fact this wrinkle could be a new type of scheme where our strong side DE, with his increased size/strength actually allows the strong side LBer to be more free, allowing him more space in his reads and better blitzing using "his" speed. We still need to acquire either a typical 4-3 DE or replace worilds in the draft in the 1st rd....again.


    I'm very proud of this offense. Haley has done a superb job, along with Munchak. We have the players and scheme to be a Superbowl Champion on offense. I still don't like how shark isn't getting any snaps on defense or baby zilla- Thomas- is still here. Same with DHB. Loosing Mauro,williams & Wesley Johnson STILL eats at me. Mis-managing our roster like that angers me somewhat.

    Cajun-
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!