1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Steelers Are Using Transition Tag On Worilds

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by TerribleTowelFlying, Mar 3, 2014.

  1. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    7,764
    1,785
    Sep 9, 2013
    Because someone would have to offer something ridiculous, even then we would still be able to match it. We obviously think we can afford a 9.x mil cap hit for Worilds this year, I don't see a team being able to throw so much more at him in 2014 that we wouldn't be able to handle it. Plus this doesn't even figure in the impact of not needing Woodley anymore. Cutting Woodley (pre June 1) frees up 14mil in 2015 and 12mil in 2016. We can afford Worilds even at a "desperate" and/or frontloaded price. This tag tells Worilds that we want him, and we want him long term. Now, we should be able to get a long term deal with him done. We can afford it.
     
  2. TerribleTowelFlying

    TerribleTowelFlying Staff Member Site Admin Mod Team

    23,288
    2,324
    Oct 12, 2011
    IIRC, Max Starks in 2008 was the last time the team transition tagged someone.
     
  3. freakfontana

    freakfontana

    5,445
    23
    Oct 19, 2011
    the right move would be sign worilds 6 years with big sb (16/18 mil) and low base salary in year one , and cut woodley pre june 1 and free up the money in 2015 and ..
     
  4. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    7,764
    1,785
    Sep 9, 2013
    We can still get this done. The transition tag doesn't mean we can't keep negotiating a long term deal with him. Honestly, I bet what you said is exactly what ends up happening now.
     
  5. steel1031

    steel1031 Well-Known Member

    3,825
    239
    Oct 16, 2011
    thanks. I remembered using it. I think right now they are just to far apart. all this does it give us a chance to keep him if price is right
     
  6. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    29,827
    6,092
    Oct 22, 2011
    14.17 mil to cut woodley pre june 1 in dead money. colon is 4.3 in dead money. 17.47 mil. dead money for both. add the 9+ for worilds and we are looking at 26.5 mil. and only 1 player. that doesn't leave much if we figure in the rest of them and ben. even with the increase in cap money. i don't see woodley getting cut pre june 1.:cool:
     
  7. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    16,909
    4,963
    Nov 4, 2011
    I'm not sure that works within the league rules. I seem to recall a rule wherein the base salary in a multi-year contract cannot increase more than some percent per year. It may be 10% or 20% or so. The reason is to prevent someone from doing exactly what you're suggesting to avoid exceeding the cap. I think what needs to be done is that the year 1 salary needs to be set at a level close enough to the year 2 salary to fit the rule, and then you immediately restructure the deal by converting most of the year 1 salary to a bonus. Under this rule, you would need to be under the cap before the restructure. I'm only about 75% sure that I've got this right because that rule may have been from the prior CBA, but I think something like that still applies.
     
  8. freakfontana

    freakfontana

    5,445
    23
    Oct 19, 2011
    the 9 milion will dissapear if we sign worilds long term , he will be around 3 milion in cap , then restructur brown same way and we can eat the dead money .
     
  9. Steel_in_DC

    Steel_in_DC Well-Known Member

    764
    14
    Jan 27, 2012
    But w/the cap increase teams have more money to throw around. I get your point on Woodley, but I don't see it being a foregone conclusion that some team will be scared away by the $9.XM the Steelers are willing to give Worlilds. So if some team throws money at him we have to match the contract including something that might be a $13 or $14M number for year one. If that is done you get no compensation for him because you put the Transition Tag on him. Why not just bite the bullet and franchise tag him and really see how Woodley and Worilds play with or off each other this coming year. Then you might know going into next year if Worilds is really worth keeping and whether Woodley has a possible second life to his career. I just think this is a greater roll of the dice considering the situation that Worilds may be the only real solid pass rushing option out there (
     
  10. numbah58

    numbah58 Staff Member Mod Team

    1,856
    29
    Oct 16, 2011
    If Worilds goes elsewhere we have an immediate need at OLB... Gotta have 3..
     
  11. freakfontana

    freakfontana

    5,445
    23
    Oct 19, 2011
    i don't think we have the money to carry the worilds tag and the woodley salary togheter
     
  12. steel1031

    steel1031 Well-Known Member

    3,825
    239
    Oct 16, 2011
    don't think they will have to. he will definitely get an offer so it will be up to us to match. I am willing to bet someone will pay 7/8 million a year.
     
  13. Steel_in_DC

    Steel_in_DC Well-Known Member

    764
    14
    Jan 27, 2012
    I was wondering that too, but w/restructuring voodoo that Colbert likes to use I guess they can figure something out. That is why I was thinking they should just to the whole 9 yards and franchise him, that way you know you have him and can figure things out going into next year. Then again I guess Colbert really thinks he knows the market and believes the Transition will get it done.
     
  14. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    7,764
    1,785
    Sep 9, 2013
    I'm under the impression that the transition tag just means no compensation in the form of first round picks if we lose him. We would still get a normal compensatory pick in 2015 (3rd round) if someone were willing to offer the ridiculous contract that you mentioned above. Someone correct me if I'm wrong?

    While there is some risk that someone will go overboard and offer a 13mil first year total, its not like we couldn't offer him an equal amount by means of a larger signing bonus. I'd be really surprised if someone thinks Worilds is worth that much... I really would. I think we get by with this tag and get him signed long term.
     
  15. lersgofor7

    lersgofor7 Well-Known Member

    772
    0
    Dec 6, 2011
    transitioned him...
     
  16. freakfontana

    freakfontana

    5,445
    23
    Oct 19, 2011

    for what ? to have two overpayd olb with one injurie prone destroying our cap in the future with the usual restructure ? . one of them is enough should find a cheaper backup
    i hope somebody overpayd worilds and we find a olb after june cuts and we release woodley , time to clean the house also if we have to suffer one year
    last season the rats bought for 5 milion a year dumervil .. i think our front office panic too often
     
  17. lersgofor7

    lersgofor7 Well-Known Member

    772
    0
    Dec 6, 2011

    They wouldn't have tagged him if they didnt think they were going to work a long term deal out
     
  18. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    7,764
    1,785
    Sep 9, 2013
    Yes, but we are already on the hook for 13.59 for Woodley this year no matter what... meaning that cutting him will only cost us 580k more. The 9mil for Worilds will be easy since cutting Ike (or him taking a giant pay cut) will save us 7mil. Foote cut saves us 1.16mil. Cutting Woodley pre June 1 just makes so much more sense since it will be a 580k shot to the head, then bye bye for good. No more dead money. Post June 1 only saves us 5.51mil and still leaves us on the hook for 8.58mil dead money in 2015. That should be a last resort. I think we will get a deal done with Worilds now, and his cap number for 2014 should drop some. I agree that is a big dead money number, but sometimes you gotta bite the bullet and do it. It puts us in a beautiful surplus scenario in 2015 and 2106 if done pre June 1. Not so much if done after.
     
  19. freakfontana

    freakfontana

    5,445
    23
    Oct 19, 2011
    like starks the first time ?
     
  20. TerribleTowelFlying

    TerribleTowelFlying Staff Member Site Admin Mod Team

    23,288
    2,324
    Oct 12, 2011
    There's two rules I'm aware of. The 25% rule which applies to rookie contracts, and the 30% rule, which says that a players contract can't increase more than 30% per year, but only applies if that contract goes past the end of the CBA.
     
  21. TerribleTowelFlying

    TerribleTowelFlying Staff Member Site Admin Mod Team

    23,288
    2,324
    Oct 12, 2011
    Right, the compensation language is just about not receiving 1st round picks like you would with an exclusive franchise tag. You still lose a free agent and thus they are factored in to next year's comp pick calculations.
     
  22. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    7,764
    1,785
    Sep 9, 2013
    Perfect. Thanks TTF.
     
  23. TerribleTowelFlying

    TerribleTowelFlying Staff Member Site Admin Mod Team

    23,288
    2,324
    Oct 12, 2011
    Agree.
     
  24. freakfontana

    freakfontana

    5,445
    23
    Oct 19, 2011

    so this tag make sense push a desperate team to overpayd worilds so we can get a high cp pick in 2015 , while or we keep woodley at reduce salary or found a cheaper one in june . stop overpaying avarage palyer and build some cap and new blood in the future
     
  25. Steel_in_DC

    Steel_in_DC Well-Known Member

    764
    14
    Jan 27, 2012
    Agree - thanks for the clarification.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!