1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Could the Steelers lose a late round draft pick due to Sidelinegate?

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by SteelerJJ, Dec 1, 2013.

  1. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,657
    10,208
    Oct 16, 2011
    Yeah, I actually thought it might not be after I read it again, the decade and a half comment stood out. I find it relevant because people like Glenn are saying they are "disgusted" that a Steeler coach would do such a thing, disgracing the organization, they are "disgusted", where was this disgust and outrage over Cowhers actions who clearly did in on purpose and was further on the field?

    It's also relevant if no fine was given to him.
     
  2. darcrav

    darcrav Well-Known Member

    7,222
    420
    Jun 16, 2012
    who is this Cower you speak of?
     
  3. ScottChab

    ScottChab Well-Known Member

    3,575
    0
    Oct 17, 2011
    He was the coach after Chuck Knoll.

    ;)
     
  4. 12to88

    12to88 Well-Known Member

    3,344
    70
    Dec 2, 2011
    :lolol:
     
  5. SteelCity_NB

    SteelCity_NB Staff Member Mod Team

    5,418
    684
    Oct 23, 2011
    No way they take a draft pick from us. This doesn't have the same "obvious" intent that the Jets incident did, where MULTIPLE people were involved. I'd expect to see a $100,000 fine though.
     
  6. 12to88

    12to88 Well-Known Member

    3,344
    70
    Dec 2, 2011
    Perhaps not. I think people are just pointing out that there seems to be a double standard: that Cowher didn't catch nearly the flak that Tomlin is catching. I don't think Cowher was fined or anything over that incident. So, for whatever reason, the NFL is making a bigger deal out of this than it should be. \

    We also have to remember that Cowher's incident took place in 1997, when the internet was in its infancy. We still didn't have the 24/7 media blitz we have today. There was no You Tube, no Facebook, no fan blogs.
     
  7. FeartheBeard

    FeartheBeard Well-Known Member

    3,126
    586
    Oct 26, 2011
    :this!: I am embarrassed that he stooped to the level that he did.
     
  8. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    Times have changed. Joe Greene once kicked a guy in the nuts and spit in his face. That was tolerated then, but he would be suspended for that today. What Cowher did has no bearing on this whatsoever. He didn't catch flack? So what? That was also before social media and the internet, where most of the outrage comes from.

    If Cowher did that today, he'd catch just as much flack as Tomlin is.
     
  9. aces4me

    aces4me Well-Known Member

    268
    13
    Jan 2, 2012
    I would be surprised to see a draft pick as part of the penalty. That is normally reserved for offenses deemed "institutional" (ie spygate and the Saint bounty thing). A six figure fine and perhaps a suspension would be the most likely outcome in my uninformed opinion.
     
  10. 12to88

    12to88 Well-Known Member

    3,344
    70
    Dec 2, 2011
    Perhaps. But point is, he wasn't fined or suspended. And the Steelers weren't faced with losing a draft pick either.
     
  11. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,657
    10,208
    Oct 16, 2011
    If you weren't embarrassed by Cowhers actions and are by Tomlins then its a double standard. Times have changed is a cop out, and this happened in the 90's, not the 70's, things havent changed that much.
     
  12. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    things have changed a ton since then, an absolute ton, not just in football but in every pro sport. Things that were tolerated 10-15 years ago are absolutely not tolerated now. I wasn't embarrassed by Cowher then because I was like 15 years old for christ sakes. I don't even remember it, the only reason I know about it is due to it being talked about on here.

    What Cowher did has no bearing on this whatsoever and I have no idea why you keep bringing it up. People used to drink and drive casually 15 years ago but today it's almost an automatic prison sentence. Do you really think a judge is going to go easy on someone for drinking and driving just because they claim that people used to do it 15 years ago without penalty?

    The two have nothing to do with each other at all. If Cowher did that today, he'd be catching flack. You act like it's a small group of tomlin haters that are making this a big deal. Tomlin seems to be well liked and well respected around the league and in the media, but the media and the NFL are making this a big deal. It's far from just a few on this site.
     
  13. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    So what? Joe Greene wasn't suspended for kicking a guy in the nuts either, does that mean it's okay to do that today? The two actions have nothing to do with each other. Just because a guy wasn't punished for something 15 years ago doesn't make it okay to do that same act today.

    The Boston Bruins once climbed into the stands at Madison Square Gardens and began fighting with fans. If that happened today, players would be looking at 1 year bans minimum and possible lifetime bans, as well as criminal charges and civil lawsuits against them, the team and the league.
     
  14. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,657
    10,208
    Oct 16, 2011
    Who gives a **** if you were 15, not everyone else was, I keep bringing it up because it is the SAME FREAKING THING! Accept his was definitely intentional. This has absolutely nothing to do with things changing and what is tolerable and what is not, give me a freaking break, both are rare occurrences, neither changed the outcome of the play, neither of them should have been on the field and one incident is being totally over blown and one was not. What, sports shows weren't around in the 90's? You were 15, I'll tell you what happened Cowhers actions were laughed about and people want to crucify Tomlin. :bscow:
     
  15. SteelerGlenn

    SteelerGlenn

    21,336
    4,820
    Nov 24, 2011
    I never said he disgraced the organization. I just said that I'm disgusted with him. And who says I wasn't outraged by Cohwers actions. You assume too much. Not really sure why my feelings for Tomlin on this matter are so troubling to you? I never said to fire the guy or anything else along those lines. Just disappointed, just let me have that for now.
     
  16. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    This has everything to do with things not being tolerated now that were tolerated then. If Tomlin did this 20 years ago it would have been laughed off. If Cowher did it today he would have been crucified. It's ridiculous that you can't see how perceptions and tolerance changes with time.
     
  17. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    30,199
    6,290
    Oct 22, 2011
    this is all just par for the course these last two years. yea, why not. LOL:shrug::facepalm::cool:
     
  18. FeartheBeard

    FeartheBeard Well-Known Member

    3,126
    586
    Oct 26, 2011
    Who gives a crap about what Cowher did? That was years ago and has absolutely NO bearing on now. I dont even remember if I was pissed about Cowher but that doesnt mean I cant be pissed about what Tomlin did.
     
  19. BobbyBiz

    BobbyBiz Well-Known Member

    6,800
    816
    Nov 30, 2011
    I will say that watching it at speed does make it seem more natural. In slow-mo it looks like a deliberate stomp to the right. I still think that he knew exactly what he was doing standing there.
     
  20. GB_Steel

    GB_Steel Well-Known Member

    2,131
    117
    Oct 20, 2011
    I think so too, but I still hold out hope that it wasn't malicious.
     
  21. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,657
    10,208
    Oct 16, 2011
    You said disgusted, others said disgraced, both are highly over the top reactions. I don't care what your feelings are Glenn, not sure why you keep making references like that, we're having a debate, kind of hard to do that without responding, no??

    By the way, did you feel the same way about Cowher? I think there is a bit of a double standard going on here and people are getting pissy about getting caught in it.

    How do you know Cowher would be crucified? There wasn't a sliver of animosity for what he did back then, we're not taking the stone age Shaner, it was played all over the news, I think you are reaching at the level of change. There is also no precedent for what you are talking about. Had there been the same reaction to what Cowher did but noting came of it, that would be your precedent, it would be ok, next time something like this happens, it will be dealt with.

    And of course I can see how perceptions have changed, you're comparing apples to oranges though.
     
  22. Lizard72

    Lizard72

    21,872
    1,846
    Oct 23, 2011
    Yes, it can be seen as red herring, but when the discussion is losing draft pick, then you have to start looking at past incidents and precedence.

    When looking at the appropriateness of a possible fine/draft pick loss, you have to look for similar incidents. other than the Jets planned and systematic antics (which caused injury), what other incidents have been similar? Obviously it was the Jets again last week, but it is appropriate to look at the Steelers organization for past incidents. That just happens to be Cowher on this one.
     
  23. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    So that when do you think this is? Tomlin appears to be very well respected in the media and in the league. Why do you think there's outrage about this? Do you think it's personal against Tomlin? Why would the media or the league take a stand against Tomlin specifically and not Cowher? It seems like you think it's personal, but that makes no sense considering Tomlin is well respected.

    We are in the age of overreacting to everything. That is what society does these days. We make a big deal out of everything, justified or not. That is what is happening and that is why there is no doubt in my mind that Cowher would be crucified if he did this today. The internet has changed how society views pretty much everything. Suddenly everyone has a voice, rather than just 2 sportscasters and a newspaper columnist.
     
  24. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    The draft pick thing is just the media trying to make revenue. Nobody in the league's office has said the loss of draft picks is being considered
     
  25. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,657
    10,208
    Oct 16, 2011
    Thats a valid point. So you do agree though that there is an overreaction to what Tomlin did though? I could see if he got tangled up with the guy but as it stands, I really didn't see it as a big deal.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!