1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Would you have...

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Rush2seven, Sep 19, 2013.

  1. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    There is no reason to let Ben do whatever he wants on the field, absolutely none. Ben hasn't been Ben in a long time now. When was the last time he made a game winning drive? He used to do that on a regular basis, including in the SB. When was the last time he did it? In fact, it seems these days he tends to throw INT's late in the game instead of TD's. Just off the top of my head and without even thinking about it, last week and Dallas last year come to mind. INT's to close out the game instead of TD's. It's been quite a few years since Ben has been good at what he used to do best. There's a reason RB's fizzle out at age 30, and the hits they take is only a part of it. The body begins to break down at 30. Suddenly hits lead to injuries when in the past they didn't. While the same speed may still be there, the quickness and explosiveness is gone. The pure athleticism to beat defensive players is gone. Ben is facing those same challenges and it has affected his game. He can't go out there and single handedly beat pass rushers like he used to. There may be the odd play where he still does it, but that's all it will be, is the odd play, the exception to the rule. For the most part, he'll get brought down or forced to throw it too early and it will be a bad throw. Sacks will start leading to injuries, like they have been the last couple years.

    The only chance in hell Ben has of being a winning QB is if he stands in the pocket and makes accurate throws. He can't scramble around back there and wait for the play to break down. Those days are gone and have been gone for a while now. There's no reason to think he can still play that style today because he hasn't been able to successfully do it in a couple years now. Besides it's not like he was overly successful doing it in the first place. He won lots of games for us when combined with a great defence, but at no point have we ever been a great offensive team. Why settle for being an average offensive team when we can be great? Sandlot football will not ever allow us to be great. A QB throwing strikes will.
     
  2. TerribleTowelFlying

    TerribleTowelFlying Staff Member Site Admin Mod Team

    23,285
    2,323
    Oct 12, 2011
  3. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    If that's the case, what part of Ben's game is Haley changing? Haley wants Ben to stay in the pocket. In fact, Haley was brought in the Rooney's to re-establish the running game and keep Ben in the pocket. That was and still is Haley's mandate. So if Ben can be effective in the pocket, what exactly is the problem with how Haley is using him?
     
  4. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,036
    9,920
    Oct 16, 2011
    Think Aaron Rodgers and not Tom Brady, thats the difference. I want Aaron Rodgers aerial attack. Standing in the pocket doesn't necessarily mean short passing game, thats not Ben, give him some time in the pocket and he will pick you apart. It doesn't mean standing it in the pocket and throwing it 3 feet the second the ball touches his hands. Everyone says, oh, he had the rb or TE wide open, mean while wide open means being tackled as soon as he catches it for a 1 yard gain. What you guys think is wide open isn't wide open at all, these defenses have great closing speed, Ben knows this.
     
  5. thorn058

    thorn058 Well-Known Member

    16,549
    4,355
    Oct 19, 2011
    Yeah NO! I don't mean wide open for a one yard gain because the defender is all over him. I mean wide open as in WIDE OPEN no one with in ten yards. Think Giovanni Bernard left all alone in no mans land between the LB and DB and running into the endzone. Ok maybe not quite that open but when I say a TE or RB is open in the flat I mean they are left alone and no one is there. I mean Ben can have a first down throw or wing it down field into Dbl coverage and he looks off the short throw and throws long. Why?
     
  6. TerribleTowelFlying

    TerribleTowelFlying Staff Member Site Admin Mod Team

    23,285
    2,323
    Oct 12, 2011
  7. Myronwemissyinz

    Myronwemissyinz

    3,055
    12
    Oct 17, 2011
    Send Richardson for Bell and a third.......
     
  8. thorn058

    thorn058 Well-Known Member

    16,549
    4,355
    Oct 19, 2011
    The most recent one would be after the phantom tripping call when Ben took the scramble sack instead of a check down to the rb in the flat.at least I was
     
  9. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,036
    9,920
    Oct 16, 2011
    I whole heartedly disagree with this on so many levels we'll just have to agree to disagree.

    Well, unless you have one hell of a TV, I'm guessing you can't see everything and like I said, what you think is open, probably isn't as often as you think it is. It's also easier to sit there and say that with your aerial view when you don't have a line to look past and LB's trying to kill you.
     
  10. TerribleTowelFlying

    TerribleTowelFlying Staff Member Site Admin Mod Team

    23,285
    2,323
    Oct 12, 2011
    It was 3rd and 20 and I would say that he's wanting to wait for a WR to get open as opposed to checking it down to Redman, except that if you go back and watch that play it isn't really a possibility due to timing unfortunately.
     
  11. thorn058

    thorn058 Well-Known Member

    16,549
    4,355
    Oct 19, 2011
    OMG bf I know you have this need to support Ben but give me a break. He is a ten year vet not a rookie and yes when they show a replay in which no one is in five yards of the rb I will say he is wide open. While you are being condescending maybe you can tell me about your magic tv that lets you see how he can see over the same line under pressure to throw downfield into dbl coverage.
     
  12. TerribleTowelFlying

    TerribleTowelFlying Staff Member Site Admin Mod Team

    23,285
    2,323
    Oct 12, 2011
    I was thinking the same thing about you Thorn, except the opposite. :hmmm: :lolol:
     
  13. thorn058

    thorn058 Well-Known Member

    16,549
    4,355
    Oct 19, 2011
    By the time he starts running and weaving it should be obvious that getting it downfield to a wr isnt an option. That taking a sack that puts you in the shadow of your own endzone is the last thing you want. Which is what I'm talking about. He is so focused on downfield he doesn't see the short completion that gives you a better option when punting
     
  14. thorn058

    thorn058 Well-Known Member

    16,549
    4,355
    Oct 19, 2011
    I will admit that I read something about ben the day camp started that has been brewing for a bit and may color my opinion of ben and his gunslinger play at times.
     
  15. TerribleTowelFlying

    TerribleTowelFlying Staff Member Site Admin Mod Team

    23,285
    2,323
    Oct 12, 2011
    He saw it. The second he looks at Redman, he's not ready for the pass. He waits for deep plays to develop like that countless times and it pays off...why wouldn't it happen this time?
     
  16. thorn058

    thorn058 Well-Known Member

    16,549
    4,355
    Oct 19, 2011
    I don't know the way the game had unfolded to that point. I guess I am hoping for too much. I think the mantra right now should be don't hurt the team. *looks at Decastro and Gilbert*
     
  17. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,036
    9,920
    Oct 16, 2011
    I find it amusing that you defend the coaches to no end, I even saw you try and defend Haley and that idiotic reverse to Cotch by passing it off as something else but here you are thinking you know how to play the QB position better then Ben. How do I know they aren't wide open? Because common sense says they aren't, because the way you sell it, teams should just march up and down the field scoring all day long just by dumping it off. Sorry Thorn, doesn't work that way and you should know that, you seem to know something about coverages and the game in general so you should know how quickly defenders can close on these guys. You think I have some need to support ben but you just seem to have some need to tear him down. You'll appreciate him when he' gone though, bank on it.
     
  18. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    The game has changed. Teams are racking up points by dumping it off to RB's. RB's are heavily involved in the passing game for all the top offensive teams in the league. We need to get the RB's more involved too. Dumping it off isn't a bad thing. RB's are lethal in the open field (not Redman, but actual good RB's). Ben needs to throw to the RB's more. A 5 yard completion is a good thing!
     
  19. thorn058

    thorn058 Well-Known Member

    16,549
    4,355
    Oct 19, 2011
    I have said I want to see Haley's offense the way he has it drawn up which I don't think we ever will. Just like with BA I will hold Haley accountable for the things he is in control of like the first series of the game. Three bad running plays aren't going to establish a rushing attack. Clearly they were trying something on the reverse because neither Tomlin or Haley could think that was a wise choice of personell. What I won't do is call Haley dumb for sending out subs for a redzone package when the play is ruled down bycontact. I mean how dare he does his job. I appreciate Ben fine now but I'm sorry shaner is right the in juries have taken their toll and he needs to learn to adapt or he will fall. I also have a few reasons like I said to TTF to be irritated at him.


    Edit:I have also taken Tomlin to task for his zen or jedi master approach to leadership.
     
  20. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,036
    9,920
    Oct 16, 2011
    Terrible call by Haley, he was at fault just as much as Paulson for walking away from the ball and assuming the play was dead.
     
  21. thorn058

    thorn058 Well-Known Member

    16,549
    4,355
    Oct 19, 2011
    I think it was a terrible sitation all thec way around. Did anyone even react to Jones running with the ball? I agree with freak.Ben should have snaped it and taken the false start or too many men on the field call would have kept possession anyways.
     
  22. HawkeyeJames

    HawkeyeJames Well-Known Member

    756
    11
    Oct 26, 2011
    Would you do this?

    It sounds like the Browns are blowing it all up. Would you give this years 2nd and lower pick or next years first to get Joe Thomas? According to reports everyone in Cleveland is available. Not sure that we could get Thomas for a 2nd and lower but just food for thought. We definitely need to find someone that can play tackle.

    Just curious to what everyone thought. I would not give up this years first since it could be in the top 5...
     
  23. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    I said in another thread, but I don't think Cleveland is having a fire sale. I think the TRich trade was about their evaluation of TRich compared to what they could get in return, and they didn't feel he was good value. After 2 weeks they were 29th in rushing, they can easily duplicate those stats with a lesser RB. RB's are a dime a dozen in today's NFL. I don't think you'll see Cleveland ever trade Joe Thomas or Josh Gordon.
     
  24. TerribleTowelFlying

    TerribleTowelFlying Staff Member Site Admin Mod Team

    23,285
    2,323
    Oct 12, 2011
    It was earlier in this thread. I merged them.
     
  25. Yogi4

    Yogi4 Well-Known Member

    1,018
    14
    Oct 24, 2011

    :this!:
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!