1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

hindsight

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Bristerfan, Sep 9, 2013.

  1. Bristerfan

    Bristerfan Well-Known Member

    236
    0
    Jan 2, 2012
    I thought it was a Bad move not bringing Legs back this off season...I know Pouncy is an All-Pro but to not have a viable back up to an often injured Center is just stupid... Beachum? A guard who is a better tackle but is playing TE because of injuries? Someone who "played a little center in high school" is our only option right now? WOW Colbert really? Way to think that through.:facepalm:
     
  2. PWP

    PWP Well-Known Member

    5,960
    480
    Oct 26, 2011
    Of course it was a bad move Legs could play Center very well,and IMO Pouncey should have always been moved to Guard he is more mobile than he is strong,I thiink Pouncy should be moved to Guard when he gets back.
     
  3. Thigpen82

    Thigpen82 Bitter optimist

    10,547
    1,547
    Oct 17, 2011
    I'm not sure the problem first of all was so much getting rid of Legursky, but not having any kind of substantial back up to take his place. But if there's no back up, then letting Legursky go was, indeed, a bad move.

    And I'll say it again: the real problem for this team is the TE position. It all stems from the big black hole there.
     
  4. SteelCity_NB

    SteelCity_NB Staff Member Mod Team

    5,418
    684
    Oct 23, 2011
    I don't think it was a bad decision. Legursky was mediocre at best. Although I do wish we would have gone out and got a more proven backup than Cody Wallace.
     
  5. Lizard72

    Lizard72

    22,938
    1,962
    Oct 23, 2011
    Pouncey has never been able to handle when teams line up a big DT on him. He's a little undersized nd totally relies on technique. While not a bad thing, it doesn't allow him to compensate for those times when he truly is overpowered.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!