1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

My thoughts on preseason wk 3

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by blackandgoldpatrol, Aug 28, 2026 at 9:02 AM.

  1. jeh1856

    jeh1856 Buds

    42,074
    14,605
    Oct 26, 2011
    I see someone found an opportunity to pull their soapbox out for the umpteenth time

    upload_2026-8-30_21-6-52.jpeg
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    29,923
    4,989
    Dec 18, 2016
    I didn't falsely accuse you of anything. I'm preemptively pointing out that I didn't start this and I'm far from the only one escalating it.

    Of course, what is happening two years later doesn't change the fact that Harris was better all three years they were together, and that letting him go cost the team resources that could have been better deployed elsewhere.

    Those were the arguments I made, which are undoubtedly true.
     
  3. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    29,923
    4,989
    Dec 18, 2016
    Multiple someones stepped onto their soapboxes, but only one owns space in the old man's head.
     
  4. Pappy928

    Pappy928 Well-Known Member

    1,355
    243
    Sep 5, 2019
    Steelers drafted a big steam roller (Najee) and then stuck him behind zone run blocking. That's smart stuff.
     
  5. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    49,820
    12,883
    Oct 16, 2011
    You included me in something I didnt start.

    Harris was a first rd pick that wasnt good enough to secure a 5th yr option and who ultimately lost his job to an UDFA. You were right about nothing.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. MojoUW

    MojoUW Well-Known Member

    1,600
    644
    Aug 16, 2023
    The fact that Harris has been “meh” elsewhere kinda points towards the system not mattering. He’s simply too slow. Strongly suspect the same with Johnson. Their just not dynamic enough athletes for the current NFL.
     
  7. Born2Steel

    Born2Steel Well-Known Member

    4,923
    1,800
    Jul 7, 2023
    Just take a look at the RB production we have gotten since Najee left. Not saying anything good or bad toward Najee. But, just look at the RB production since he left.


    No need to want to bring him back that I can find.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    29,923
    4,989
    Dec 18, 2016
    I was right about plenty. The Steelers felt Harris was the better back when they had both, which is why he started every game while getting more snaps and touches than Warren. They did what they thought gave them the best chance to win.

    I was right that it cost them their third-round pick last year, who then turned out to be a terrible bust.

    I was right that there were factors beyond who had been better at play in their decision to move on, such as the mileage on his body and the way he ran his mouth about running backs needing to get paid.

    The only thing I got wrong was underestimating Gainwell, who mitigated their failed attempt to replace Harris.
     
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2026 at 11:02 PM
  9. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    49,820
    12,883
    Oct 16, 2011
    So much coping to avoid that the better player is still on the team.
     
  10. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    48,323
    12,596
    Dec 23, 2020
    I wouldn't know since he had only 15 carries for 61 yards, and 3 receptions for 25 yards before he tore his Achilles. I believe thats over 4 yards a carry, and over 8 yards a reception. We shall see if he can come back from the torn Achilles, or not.
    This is not in anyways a slight on Warren.
    I love Warren, but I do completely agree with @Formerscribe@Formerscribe that they should have signed his 5th year option, and used their draft elsewhere, and then let him go.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  11. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    29,923
    4,989
    Dec 18, 2016
    Spoken like someone who can't handle the facts being against his argument. What they are now is not what they were two years ago. You know that, and you know this argument dates back to before Harris's final year as a Steeler, but you ignore those facts because they don't fit your inaccurate narrative.
     
  12. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    49,820
    12,883
    Oct 16, 2011
    Yeah Im sure you believe that too :lolol:

    100s of posts by you dancing around the fact they kept the player they liked better.

    I dont care about your opinion that they would have been better off keeping both, that doesnt change the fact that they kept the player that was better.

    An UDFA overtook a 1st rd pick because the 1st rd pick didnt meet the level of play that a 1st rd pick warrants for getting a 5th year option.

    Those are the facts that dont fit your narrative.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  13. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    29,923
    4,989
    Dec 18, 2016
    I'm not dancing around your opinion, which doesn't fit the facts.

    Warren never overtook Harris. Harris started every game they played together. He got more snaps and more touches. Harris was the player they liked better. Warren was the one who had more tread left on the tires and less attitude.

    Your argument is built on the ridiculous notion that they started Harris, gave him more snaps, and gave him more touches despite liking Warren better. That would mean they hurt their chances to win because...why exactly? Because Tomlin liked him? Because they wanted to save face? Those things went out the window when they didn't pick up his option, so the only thing that makes sense is that the Steelers believed Harris gave them the better chance to win.

    The rest is you trying to win an argument you lost a long time ago.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!