1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Two-year extension for Jaylen Warren

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Steelersfan43, Sep 1, 2025.

  1. jeh1856

    jeh1856 We Are

    38,882
    13,493
    Oct 26, 2011
    upload_2026-3-29_9-24-8.gif
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 3
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. NorthernBlitz

    NorthernBlitz Well-Known Member

    1,668
    498
    Sep 5, 2025
    I think we maybe talked about this before.

    The D was bad at getting off the field "normally".

    But they generated lots of turnovers.

    So when they got turnovers (especially more than one), my guess is that we mostly won.

    But when they didn't get turnovers, my guess is that we mostly lost because they weren't good at stopping teams on 3rd. Both when compared to the rest of the league. And when compared to last year.

    So my guess is that the D was a big part of a bunch of the wins.

    And also a bunch of the losses.

    I also think if you look at raw stats (instead of rates), you'd expect us to look good. We averaged 65.4 plays against per game. This was 2nd worst in the league (Indy @ 65.5). But that 0.1 plays per game is basically 2 plays across the season. Median plays per game was ~ 61.7. SO our defense played 63 more snaps across the season vs. the average team. Which is a little more than an average game.
    https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/opponent-plays-per-game

    It is still impressive that we were still essentially average in points allowed given all the plays the D spent on the field IMO.
     
  3. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    47,933
    11,846
    Oct 16, 2011
    Let’s go back to your bogus claim above. So you’re saying the roll that Warren has no body of work in is the roll he’s had the most success in. Brilliant.

    I’m not disputing Warren will get more receiving work, I expect him to and will come on 1st 2nd and 3rd down. It’s your claim that Warren going back to his more successful roll that is bs and his body of work proves that
     
  4. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    47,933
    11,846
    Oct 16, 2011
    It’s not even moving goal posts it’s just him making **** up.
     
  5. jeh1856

    jeh1856 We Are

    38,882
    13,493
    Oct 26, 2011
    On the advice of my legal council I have nothing further to say on this subject ;)
     
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2026 at 12:20 PM
    • Like Like x 3
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 2
  6. forgotten1

    forgotten1 Well-Known Member

    11,926
    2,959
    Mar 4, 2022
    [​IMG]
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 4
  7. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    44,969
    11,746
    Dec 23, 2020
    Now think of how much longer they would have spent on the field without the turnovers.
     
  8. jeh1856

    jeh1856 We Are

    38,882
    13,493
    Oct 26, 2011
    Actually what I just thought is it’s not hard to tell when you break for lunch

    I logged on and had 12 alerts between 1:36 and 2:16 and most of them came from you

    :smiley1:
     
  9. NorthernBlitz

    NorthernBlitz Well-Known Member

    1,668
    498
    Sep 5, 2025
    Yep.

    If they were bad at generating turnovers in addition to bad at stopping teams get yards (on 3rd down in particular), it would have been much worse.

    And last year was still a team that was supposed to lead through defense. I get that the D was probably tired from carrying the O for the previous 5 years or whatever...but I don't think they were necessarily the better unit last year.

    Being bad at drafting (particularly on the offensive side of the ball) has really put the Steelers in a bind IMO. Because now we're not above average on either side of the ball IMO. Hopefully some fresh systems change that up.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!