1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

TJ Watt

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Blast Furnace, Jan 18, 2026 at 8:27 PM.

  1. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    43,581
    11,367
    Dec 23, 2020
    Yeah Yeah Yeah and many said Cam was done two years ago. You don't know for sure.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    28,349
    4,696
    Dec 18, 2016
    Heyward isn't an edge rusher. They have completely different skill sets. Heyward can rely on power and experience to make up for any lost quickness or agility. That doesn't work as well for an edge rusher.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Mashburn

    Mashburn Well-Known Member

    6,193
    1,489
    Apr 30, 2021
    1. Steelers could recover the remaining prorated signing bonus. (just like the Lions did with Calving Johnson. to which they did and won)

    2. The signing bonus money already paid still hits the cap. So the remaining prorated bonus on Watt’s deal would Accelerate into the cap all at once, unless the Steelers process the retirement after June 1, which would be
    Year 1: Only 1 year of prorated bonus hits.
    Year 2: The rest hits.

    3. we owe no future money

    4. if he un-retires, it would be just like a Gronk/Brady situations. where when he comes back, it starts again and we have the decision to play him, trade him, or renegotiate the contract.

    IF he retires, than it would be roughly 25 million cap hit for 2026. So we would get 15 million in cap savings (because he was to have a 42 million cap hit)

    If he retires post June first, Then we take on a 13 million cap hit for 2026 and 2027, but with his contract of 42 million in each. then it is about 29 million in cap savings each year.

    If we do the clawback (asking for the prorated bonus back), it will not help us in savings. but we could try asking the shield to help us, but that is not going to happen.

    @Thor@Thor am I right or wrong?
     
  4. Mashburn

    Mashburn Well-Known Member

    6,193
    1,489
    Apr 30, 2021
    Only other thing that could take place is he request a trade.

    if a team wants him I think it will be like a von miller situation of a second and a third.
    - Von was playing ok Denver, but not elite like he was.
    - Von averaged 0.64 sacks before the trade.
    - TJ averaged 0.46 sacks this season.
    - Von 32 years old
    - TJ will be 32 in October.
    - Also Von contract was the most at the time of the trade and the rams decreased it.
     
  5. Michael E

    Michael E Well-Known Member

    781
    187
    Mar 2, 2022
    I believe we'd eat that bonus dead cap, so the team acquiring him would actually be getting him at a somewhat reasoanble contract, but I could be wrong. The acquiring team would only be on the hook for what remains, not the giant bonus we gave him.

    So, I think trading him will not be very difficult. The return may not be anything substantial though.

    MAYBE Jerry Jones will overpay, give us a 1st or a 2nd for Watt, given he traded away his stud OLB and had very little pash rush or defense since.

    Dallas makes a ton of sense.
     
    • Very Optimistic Very Optimistic x 1
  6. Michael E

    Michael E Well-Known Member

    781
    187
    Mar 2, 2022
    There are AlWAYS stupid owners out there and the Watt name is BIG TIME. Some clueless owner will be wetting himself at the chance of praying TJ Watt away. I am not worried about trading him if we want to trade him. I just don't see Rooney wanting that. Watt would have to demand it and I think he'll come to his senses. A trade means he won't be playing for Tomlin on the other team either.
     
  7. Mashburn

    Mashburn Well-Known Member

    6,193
    1,489
    Apr 30, 2021
    I agree with you..... but Von Miller proved this exact situation.
     
  8. M2K

    M2K Well-Known Member

    53
    14
    Mar 10, 2019
    The contract was a dumb move by the FO. Not getting a 2nd starting WR was incompetence. Until the Steelers get a real QB, they should trade players like TJ Watt to secure additional 1st Rd picks increasing their chances of selecting one of the top 1st Rd QBs.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    38,920
    9,576
    Nov 14, 2011
    Much ado about nothing players say stuff like this often.
     
  10. CK 13

    CK 13 Well-Known Member

    12,469
    3,159
    Nov 5, 2011
    Well if he retires will be a "Bobby Bonilla Day" for years if in so they can come to an agreement to spread it out. The contract was a colossal mistake.
     
  11. SC Gamecock

    SC Gamecock

    1,935
    320
    Oct 18, 2011
  12. CK 13

    CK 13 Well-Known Member

    12,469
    3,159
    Nov 5, 2011
    No team is going to fork over a 1st for him. A 3rd yes and hopefully taking on some of his contract baggage which is massive.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  13. CK 13

    CK 13 Well-Known Member

    12,469
    3,159
    Nov 5, 2011
    your profile pick! Miss that experience!
     
  14. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    38,920
    9,576
    Nov 14, 2011
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. feltdeez

    feltdeez Well-Known Member

    389
    90
    Sep 4, 2025
    I was against this contract and wanted to trade him. His production fell off last year and at his age the chances of him rebounding were slim.

    Now we are stuck with him. If Dallas calls, make that trade.
     
  16. NorthernBlitz

    NorthernBlitz Well-Known Member

    1,124
    311
    Sep 5, 2025
    Basically impossible to cut him: $94MM dead and -$52MM cap hit pre Jun 1. Not quite as bad but still impossible after Jun1: $74MM dead. -$32MM cap loss.

    Terrible if they trade him pre Jun1. $30MM dead cap. But $12MM cap savings.

    Just pretty bad if they trade him post Jun1: $10MM dead cap. $32MM cap savings.

    Source: https://overthecap.com/player/t-j-watt/5614

    I don't know the ramifications on cash spending. But TJ is scheduled to make $32MM in cash next year. So we'd have to spend at least that much more than we would normally intend to in UFA to get to the cash spending floor. Note that spending money on UFAs is generally the worst value for both cash and cap spending (although you can rig it so the first year cap hit is low).

    Basically, TJ is going to be on the team next year unless we want to go full tank. And even if we try to go full tank, I think we're kind of handcuffed because IIRC this is the 3rd year in the 3 year average for the cash spend floor. And i think we were under in year 1 and right around the floor in year 2 (maybe right around the floor both years). So we can't drop the cash spend hard this year.

    Technically, if we did want to tank the "best" year to do it would be the season after next year (the season that starts in 2027). That's the year when the cap floor gets a new 3 year average. So if you wanted to (and we won't because it's not how this team operates). We could tank (not spend money) in that first year. Bank a bunch of cap space for the 2028 season while being appreciably below the cash floor on a 3 year average. Draft a QB. Then, spend like drunken sailors in year 2 and year 3 of the cash average...or maybe just wait until year 3.

    As stated above, I'd put this at pretty close to a 0% chance based on how the Steelers operate. But the 3 year cash floor could incentivize teams to do stuff like this IMO.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Informative Informative x 1
  17. Born2Steel

    Born2Steel Well-Known Member

    4,261
    1,520
    Jul 7, 2023
    Why are we trading/retiring Watt again?
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  18. Sojourner

    Sojourner Well-Known Member

    279
    51
    Jun 25, 2015
    I was wondering the same thing. He's still an elite player.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  19. AskQuestionsLater

    AskQuestionsLater Writing Team

    25,913
    6,716
    Apr 21, 2016

    This.


    Like the rest of the Defense, T.J. Watt needs a new voice. Teryls time has come and gone. Dude should have been fired a long ass time ago. Not all results from him during this defenses height were as good as the numbers would suggest.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  20. nor

    nor Well-Known Member

    1,121
    297
    Oct 26, 2016
    https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/player/_/id/21771/tj-watt
     
  21. freakfontana

    freakfontana

    5,785
    118
    Oct 19, 2011
  22. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    18,180
    5,500
    Nov 4, 2011
    What are you trying to tell me via a link to numbers that match what I said?

    The question is whether a player choosing to retire voids salary guarantees not yet paid out. Those guarantees definitely protect the player and the player gets paid if the team terminates the contract. Is there certainly that the player gets to retire and be paid $32M/year if the player terminates the contract? That I don’t know, but it makes no sense.
     
  23. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    43,581
    11,367
    Dec 23, 2020
    Yeah I know. The example was I heard multiple people say Cam was done two years ago, they were sure, and He hasn't slowed yet.
    I prefer the wait, and see approach to the, I know now for sure approach. Because I have seen more than I can remember of players have a down year, and bounce back the next.
     
  24. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    38,920
    9,576
    Nov 14, 2011
    7 sacks is elite :rolleyes:?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  25. Sojourner

    Sojourner Well-Known Member

    279
    51
    Jun 25, 2015
    Are total sacks the only criteria? I don't think so and I seriously doubt most people would say that.
    But I could be wrong. I'm only a fan after all.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!