1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Ziggy Hood- Bust?

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by cajunyankee, May 14, 2013.

  1. cajunyankee

    cajunyankee Well-Known Member

    4,135
    686
    Oct 27, 2011

    Not to be picky but I said to be highly drafted and fail to approach your potential, did not say fail to reach your potential, a big difference.

    Cajun-
     
  2. HugeSnack

    HugeSnack Well-Known Member

    5,243
    103
    Oct 17, 2011
    Ah, well I guess I must have read the wrong word there. I don't see a massive difference between approach and reach. It's different degrees of the same principle, I guess. I also was reading it as if "being highly drafted" and "failing to approach your potential" were separate qualifications, the way you said it originally. And no doubt I was drawing on your previous complaints about Timmons failing to reach his potential.
     
  3. Diamond

    Diamond Well-Known Member

    5,790
    469
    May 26, 2012
    Even Rodney Bailey had his highlights after the steelers drafted him in the 6th round in 2001, he played in 16 games his rookie year and recorded 12 tackles and two sacks, he was cut in 03 and played for other teams until 06 when the steelers resigned him for a year, he played for the cards in 07 but at least the steelers got 3 years out of a 6th rounder who lasted for 7 years in the NFL......
     
  4. HugeSnack

    HugeSnack Well-Known Member

    5,243
    103
    Oct 17, 2011
    That's true. I guess, when you really stop and think about it, the only real "difference" between Hood and Bailey is that Hood is way better than Bailey. Thanks, I hadn't looked at it that way before.
     
  5. blackandgoldpatrol

    blackandgoldpatrol Well-Known Member

    5,520
    2,176
    Dec 5, 2011

    we all know that de in our version of the 3-4 isn't about stats, it's about controlling your area, and hood just doesn't stack up against keisel in that department...... but if you really want to bring out stats, you also should point out the ot's they had to face.. hood is facing the rt, while keisel is facing what most consider the most important position on the o-line... the lt is more often than not, the dominant lineman of the group, so keisel is clearly facing stronger competition................even more so, i'm glad you mentioned the teams each had their sacks against............ hood's sacks, as you say, came against philly, Baltimore and san diego...... philly and san diego have o-lines that are in transition...... Michael oher is the only legitimate marquee tackle out of the 3 that gave up hood's sacks........... keisel performed against Brandon albert, joe Thomas, and andre smith/ Andrew whitworth (I forget which one is on cincy's left side, but both are clearly superior tackles).......... there is no comparison when you look at who these men are facing week in and week out.
     
  6. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    15,677
    2,495
    Oct 26, 2011
    Who else is tired about controlling an area? Can't you penetrate towards the QB in this scheme? LOL
    I for one am tired of this scheme. Isn't this a passing league now? That you MUST get PRESSURE on the QB?
    Hell even the mediocre Qb's(gradkowski) have torn up the Steelers when there is NO PRESSURE. DO YOU want to beat Tom Brady/
    Peyton Manning? Apply PRESSURE, even the great ones make mistakes. What will Aaron Rodgers do to us with no pressure? God help us.
     
  7. strummerfan

    strummerfan Well-Known Member

    18,028
    3,635
    May 9, 2012

    That's not the job of a defensive linemen in the 3-4. Why is that concept so hard for you to grasp?
     
  8. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,644
    10,201
    Oct 16, 2011
    Maybe he's saying he wants to switch to a 4-3 :shrug: I find it funny too, if they do their job, the pressure will come from where it is supposed to. If they can get to the QB, great but that's not there primary job. Was Aaron Smith a sack machine? He reached 8 twice, he was usually around 2 to 5 sacks a year. Hood had 3 last year, right on par with Aaron.
     
  9. cajunyankee

    cajunyankee Well-Known Member

    4,135
    686
    Oct 27, 2011

    How soon we forget!!! The only then Hood has done better at than A. Smith was getting drafted. Hood being 1st rd and Smith being 4th rd.. Please don't say Hood is right on par with Smith, Hood has trouble carring Smith's jock strap.


    Let's take a small look at Smith. Drafted in 99' he started every game from 00' thru 06'. In those years his sack #'s were 4 in 00', 8 in 01', then 5.5, 2, 8, 2 & in 06' 4.5 sacks. In 07' he had a knee injury then missed final 4 gms with a torn triceps. Healthy in 08' he had 5.5 sacks. He was then on IR in o9'/10'/11' then released.


    His total tackle #'s are also higher. Yes hood had 3 sacks last year but only 1.5 in 11' when he replaced Smith. He also had 3 in 10' while smith was on IR.


    Wardismvp is not wrong, A 3-4 DE job is not to just hold his ground. I can type a long detailed expose' on the duties of the 3-4 personell vs. the 4-3 players but its pointless. In short the 3-4 DE is to be disruptive on the edge collapsing the pocket. He MUST NOT loose containment or get out of position while doing this as it leasves the defense vulnerable if he does. By being a force to be reckoned with he commands extra attention and in this the OLBer is freed up to make the splash plays. If he, DE, primary tries to "hold" his position he's actually helping the offensive player which frees up a guy to help stop the OLBer.


    With Smith being that force requirring attention it allowed Gildon then Woodley to shine. Kimo was a force ( not as much as Smith) which allowed Poter to shine. So is Kiesel.


    Now when it come to holding his ground the zero-tech ( Hampton then McLendon now) is more important due to him having a two-gap interior responsiblity. Even here if he can "push" the pocket its a good thing. The more he pushes the more offensive attention he garners.......


    Cajun-
     
  10. Thigpen82

    Thigpen82 Bitter optimist

    10,527
    1,534
    Oct 17, 2011
    Not trying to split hairs - after all, it's pretty clear that Aaron Smith is head and shoulders above Hood - but I don't think those sack numbers don't particularly disprove BF's point.

    At any rate, I don't think there's even an argument as to whether Hood is Aaron Smith-level. The point is more whether it's right to label Hood a bust when his performance has been solid but not spectacular.

    I take your point about the need to be disruptive, but at the moment I don't see an alternative on the roster who does much more than Hood in that position.
     
  11. HugeSnack

    HugeSnack Well-Known Member

    5,243
    103
    Oct 17, 2011
    I think Heyward will be better on the pass rush. I'm hoping we see a true rotation with Ziggy, Cam, and Brett in the nickel package. And maybe the occasional McLendon, although not too much because he'll be playing 1st and 2nd down this year too. Rushing the passer is one of the most exhausting things you can do, so the more people to get into the rotation, the better. Cam can do it. I just hope they actually do it this year.
     
  12. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,644
    10,201
    Oct 16, 2011
    I meant his sack production last year fell in the range of Smiths yearly sack total except for 2 seasons when he had 8 sacks, every other year Smith was between 2.5 and 5.5. And since Hood only has 4 season under his belt and had his best season to date, it can be argued that he is turning the corner and may yet achieve 8 sacks in a season. All that said, no, of course Hood isn't as good as Smith and never was my intention to imply that. I was talking strictly sack production last year. Which by the way, isn't what his job is, which was the whole point of my and Strummers post. His job is not to get to the QB, it's to free up the LB's so they can, defensive lineman don't get the glory in this system.
     
  13. cajunyankee

    cajunyankee Well-Known Member

    4,135
    686
    Oct 27, 2011

    Smith's 1st 3 seasons he avg about 6 sacks a season. His 1st 5 seasons he avg around 5.5 sacks a year. You say after 4 years Hood is just now turning the corner and that was the point of this thread to begin with. You and others keep saying DEs are not to get sacks but why is A. Smith the Greatest 3-4 DE ever? Because he got sacks! Because he got lots of tackles! Because he was never out of position! He was schematically sound and effective and that is what commanded the extra attention and that is what freed up the LBers!!!!!!!!!!!!

    I look forward to seeing what Heyward is gonna do. I also look forward to seeing what Hood can do if Coach Mitchell is able to correct his technique issues. Thigpen82 is right, we have no-one else in his place.

    Cajun-
     
  14. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,644
    10,201
    Oct 16, 2011
    You keep making my point. Isn't 3 sacks right in between 2.5 and 5.5? It's not like Aaron averaged 8 sacks every year, if he had, I wouldn't be making the comparison about sacks. He did that twice, the rest of the time, he was between 2.5 and 5.5 sacks per year. I loved having Aaron as a Steeler but he wasn't a sack monster, it's not their job and I think we can agree that Aaron was the best so why are we getting down on Ziggy for not producing like he did? He's doing fine, just because people don't live up to Aaron Smith, doesn't make them a bust. If Ziggy drops back down to 1 sack this year, I'll eat crow but I bet he's around 4-6 sacks.
     
  15. Fe3CCity

    Fe3CCity Well-Known Member

    872
    190
    Aug 21, 2012
    Lets not forget though that 3 and long or just a noticeable passing situation those DE get kicked inside and our base nickel is more like a 2-4-5 the DE stop the 5 and use (my guess on the play called ) a 3 tech. They turn into usual DT (4-3) when our OLB turn into DE.

    This is very generally speaking. Don't get on me about DL defense and the complexity I agree. I speak generally.

    Dont get me wrong I think ziggy has done a solid starting job. Aaron smith will be remembered around Pittsburgh ziggy won't, as of now. I think he need far more improvement at the point of attack.

    PS my phone auto corrected ziggy to soggy. Think that's what he should be called. Sometimes on runs to his side he gets balled up like a soggy (insert absorbent item).
     
  16. freakfontana

    freakfontana

    5,480
    37
    Oct 19, 2011
    the difference between smith and hood is not the sacks but how play the run and how many tackles for loss smith had .hood is soft at the point of the attack smith was penetratingand commanded more double team
     
  17. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,644
    10,201
    Oct 16, 2011
    This is spiraling away from my initial point. Wardismvp made a post complaining about sacks or maybe he said pressure, I think, anyway, thats not what our guys do but to make a point and only in regards to sacks, I said Ziggy last year was right in the middle of Smiths sack production. If you take away the 2 seasons that Smith had 8 sacks this is whats left:

    2000 - 4
    2002 - 5.5
    2003 - 2
    2005 - 2
    2006 - 4.5
    2007 - 2.5
    2008 - 5.5
    2009 - 2.0

    Last year, Hood had 3, falls right in the middle of Smiths production. If the best we ever had got the QB so infrequently, then why are people clamoring for Hood to? In every other facet of the game, Aaron Smith blows Ziggy away, you won't get an argument from me there. I'm just pointing out that in our system, stop expecting our DE to get to the QB.
     
  18. TheSteelHurtin2188

    TheSteelHurtin2188 Well-Known Member

    5,380
    261
    Nov 30, 2011
    It is a passing league now and can you remind me who was the number 1 pass defense the last two years. One year you could call fluke but to do it back to back years you are doing something right.
     
  19. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    30,158
    6,269
    Oct 22, 2011
    smiths first 4 years 17.5 sacks. ziggys first 4 years 8.5. smith more then doubled ziggy's sack totals in that time. it still doesn't make him a bust.:cool:
     
  20. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,644
    10,201
    Oct 16, 2011
    I was comparing him to the 8 seasons which were Smiths norm, not 2 aberration seasons which accounted for most of his sack total.
     
  21. TheSteelHurtin2188

    TheSteelHurtin2188 Well-Known Member

    5,380
    261
    Nov 30, 2011
    Big Ben sucks because he's not Joe Montana. Stop comparing him to smith who could be the best 3-4 defensive end ever.
     
  22. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    15,677
    2,495
    Oct 26, 2011
    I am still hoping that DL lets his DE's play upfield, We actually may have a chance against passing teams?
    Our #1 defense was so great, we finished 8 and 8.LOL. Thank you Cajun for explaining this to some people, that really can't
    understand that DE's can apply pressure and are soley not there to HOLD there ground, amazing.Folks the league has changed
    most teams worry more about the passing attack and how to get to the QB than stopping the run(holding your ground).
    When most teams are throwing it 65 percent of the time you better be able to apply pressure on the QB from whoever it may be
    or it is going to be pitch and catch. Also watch how much better our secondary could be, when PRESSURE from whoever is applied to the QB.
     
  23. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,644
    10,201
    Oct 16, 2011
    You mean more then the 18 QB pressures he had in 2010 and 20 QB pressures he had in 2011? And really, you are blaming our 8-8 record on the defense? If only someone could make you understand.
     
  24. freakfontana

    freakfontana

    5,480
    37
    Oct 19, 2011
    a guy that would have been perfect to replace smith in the steelers defense would have been derek wolfe drafted by denver at 36 overall in 2012
     
  25. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    30,158
    6,269
    Oct 22, 2011
    when your a first round draft pick, thats the company you are compared to. i'm just stating facts. the first 4 years of both. nobody knows what he will do for the next several years to compare it to. do we compare our OLB's to clark haggens? no we compare them to porter and gildon and harrison and such. so why not compare him to smith?:cool:
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!