1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Kenneth Gainwell

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by mac daddyo, Mar 11, 2025 at 9:20 PM.

  1. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    24,877
    4,081
    Dec 18, 2016
    I'm not sure how to make it more clear for you. Durability isn't binary. It isn't durable or not. There are levels to it. Put someone like JK Dobbins on end of the spectrum, Najee Harris on the other, and Warren somewhere in the middle. Harris has a rare level of durability. I never wrote that 250 carries is some Herculean feat, but Warren hasn't made it to 150 in one season yet. Gibbs, Swift, and Jones all reached that number for the first time last season, but they haven't always been as durable while Harris has never been under 255 carries.

    Last season was the first Swift didn't miss a game. Gibbs missed time as a rookie in 2023. Jones missed six games in 2023 and two more in 2021. Warren missed two and was severely limited in others last season. The difference is those guys were carrying a much heavier workload than Warren has as a pro, which makes him breaking down last season even more concerning.

    Warren has never run the ball more than 15 times in an NFL game. He has never averaged even nine carries per game. Of course his ability to do more is a question mark, especially with the multiple injuries last season.

    Darn those inconvenient numbers.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Bubbahotep

    Bubbahotep Well-Known Member

    372
    76
    Mar 19, 2022
    Those are the most subjective statements of all. But, keep trying.

    (and there is nothing subjective about whether a carry resulted in a first down. you don't know the meaning of the word obviously)
     
  3. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    24,877
    4,081
    Dec 18, 2016
    Please try to follow along. I prefer objective statistics over subjective. In no way is it contradictory for me to share subjective opinions after making that statement.

    My point was that whether or not a carry results in a first down is objective, which makes it better than that subjective nonsense you tried presenting as if it was valid. Neither of those statistics account for the disadvantages Harris dealt with last season. If you don't realize that the quarterback play was erratic at best, the line was shaky as it dealt with a series of injuries, and the lack of a valid starting receiver opposite Pickens crippled the offense and made it too easy for defenses to stack the box against Harris, I have no idea which team you were watching last season but it wasn't the Steelers.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,425
    9,677
    Oct 16, 2011
    Super. I’ll take the durable back that perhaps doesnt play every game but provides better production. Is that clear enough for you are you going to come back with another I know you are but what am I retort.

    Oh nooos, a 5’9 215 back will be asked to do what many other backs before him have done I sure hope Mr glass is up to this massive task :rolleyes:

    Damn those Steelers for not holding onto Mr 3.9ypc, how will they ever replace that. But hey, lets not forget the golf clap for playing every game *golf clap*
     
  5. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    7,529
    1,738
    Sep 9, 2013
    Najee's a bum. He was an available bum that didn't fumble, but a bum nonetheless. He'd flash for 3 games a year (usually all in a row) and then fizzle out into a vintage 18 carries for 67 yards performance after ripping off a 20+ yard run late in the 4th quarter with the game in hand.

    Warren isn't an injury problem. He was banged up a bit last season, but only missed 2 games. Nothing long term, just some minor injuries that popped up. He missed one his rookie year. He also isn't too small to be a primary back. There isn't a reasonable argument that should make us worry that he won't be able to handle 15-17 carries a game. He's been good enough to be afforded the opportunity to run with the job, and I am excited to get him more involved in the offense. We let Najee walk, not because we couldn't afford him or we lowballed a big time player, but because his play on the field wasn't good enough to earn a second contract. Luckily for us we have a back on the roster already that has outperformed him on the field for the past couple years. Nobody is going to miss Najee here in short order.
     
    • Very Optimistic Very Optimistic x 1
  6. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    24,877
    4,081
    Dec 18, 2016
    Please don't imply that I am the one being rude here just because I threw your words back at you. That simply is not true.

    You claimed that there are no question marks with Warren. That is incorrect. He hasn't proven he can do what a lead back needs to do. He doesn't protect the ball nearly as well as Harris. He hasn't shown he can stay healthy. Those are question marks. Just because top backs like Gibbs and Jones and a very good one like Swift can do something doesn't mean Warren can do it.
     
  7. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    24,877
    4,081
    Dec 18, 2016
    He missed two games, but was severely limited for more. I wouldn't call him injury prone, but he certainly isn't as durable as Harris.
     
  8. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,425
    9,677
    Oct 16, 2011
    I implied you were copying me, didnt say anything about being rude :confused:

    You’re reaching dude. He missed two games in two seasons. Thats durable.

    You’re reaching on painting him as having a fumbling problem.

    You’re reaching that he can’t carry the ball 15-20 times a game.

    So while yes, Harris missed less time plus has better ball security, I’d exchange that for Warrens 5.3 ypc to Harris 3.9.

    Also, let’s not forget that Harris played nearly an entire season with a lisfranc injury which severely limited his effectiveness. If you are going to ding Warren for playing injured than recognize the same for Harris at least.
     
  9. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    32,263
    7,880
    Nov 14, 2011
    I'm not that impressed by 5.3 YPC when you only carry the ball about 8 times a game, and many of them coming on third downs.
     
  10. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    15,481
    2,453
    Oct 26, 2011
    I like the signing., Scouts better bring in another in later rounds.
     
  11. RobertoC#21

    RobertoC#21 Well-Known Member

    632
    197
    Nov 24, 2011
    Cut Patterson now , very quickly, immediately, like yesterday even. Have Gainwell be the back you wished Patterson still was 10 years ago. Draft Hendrickson or a stud RB in the 3rd or 4th and hope Warren doesnt fail as a #1 to start the season otherwise we screwed up by letting Harris go.
     
  12. Born2Steel

    Born2Steel Well-Known Member

    2,314
    794
    Jul 7, 2023
    I think we will all be pleasantly surprised by Gainwell.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,425
    9,677
    Oct 16, 2011
    You’re just making stuff up. Did most of his work on 1st and 2nd down.

    1st down
    69 att
    285 yards
    4.1 ypc
    1 TD

    2nd down
    37 att
    157 yards
    4.2 ypc

    3rd down
    11 att
    66 yards
    6.0 ypc

    4th down
    3 att
    3 yards
    1.0 ypc
     
  14. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    32,263
    7,880
    Nov 14, 2011
    And on first and second down he wasn't much different than Najee, that third down average boosts his YPC :hehehe:.
     
  15. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    24,877
    4,081
    Dec 18, 2016
    Harris wasn’t useless when he had the foot injury, and he wasn’t limited all of that season.

    Didn’t Warren also miss time as a rookie? Harris has never missed a start despite a much heavier workload.

    I didn’t claim that Warren has a fumbling problem, but he doesn’t secure the ball nearly as well as Harris. He also seems to really struggle with bad weather. Harris doesn’t have that problem, either.

    Third down backs don’t face stacked boxes. They don’t get many touches in short yardage, either. Thawed are factors that affect that average per carry that have nothing to do with the player’s ability.

    I am not reaching at all despite your false claims to the contrary. I’m just not ignoring or dismissing the strengths of either player.
     
  16. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,425
    9,677
    Oct 16, 2011
    Great, our first rd pick was outperformed by an UDFA.
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  17. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,425
    9,677
    Oct 16, 2011
    He was pretty useless to the extent fans were calling for him to be benched.

    No I don’t believe so.

    Big exaggerations here on ball security and bad weather.

    Not a 3rd down back:

    1st down
    69 att
    285 yards
    4.1 ypc
    1 TD

    2nd down
    37 att
    157 yards
    4.2 ypc

    3rd down
    11 att
    66 yards
    6.0 ypc

    4th down
    3 att
    3 yards
    1.0 ypc
     
  18. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    24,877
    4,081
    Dec 18, 2016
    It is much easier to maintain a higher average per carry as a backup who is getting far fewer carries. I'm genuinely surprised so many folks on this board don't get that concept.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. Thor

    Thor

    3,237
    1,264
    Mar 20, 2014
    With that small of a sample size (both ways) it's hard to draw anything relevant out conclusively.

    Obviously Warren has had a smaller number of carries over his entire career than Harris, so this comparison needs be taken with a certain grain of salt. But here are the career splits by down for both.

    1st down (att/yd/TD)
    Harris: 652/2606/18...4.0 ypc
    Warren: 188/837/2.....4.5 ypc

    2nd down
    Harris: 388/1497/8....3.9 ypc
    Warren: 125/681/4....5.4 ypc

    3rd down
    Harris: 49/197/1........4.0 ypc
    Warren: 27/140/0......5.2 ypc

    4th down
    Harris: 8/12/1...........1.5 ypc
    Warren: 6/16/0.........2.7 ypc

    There are pros and cons to any player. My eyes see a more dynamic back in Warren. He's got greater burst through the hole, speed in the open field, and is a capable blocker. Harris is a rock; he isn't flashy, but he's dependable, durable, elite ball security, gets the tough yards. Underrated as a receiver (look back at his rookie stats). I like the duo as a tandem, but I wish they would have tried flipping to Warren as the feature back while both were still here and Harris could be the safety net if things went south.

    And I'll plug again here (shamelessly ;) ) that I think they should have picked up Harris' option for that reason, and also to hold off on having to find a replacement while they take care of addressing other needs. From what they've done thus far you can't tell me that had the money fixed to go elsewhere! :lolol:
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  20. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    24,877
    4,081
    Dec 18, 2016
    It isn't an exaggeration at all. They had to pull him from a game because he couldn't hold onto the ball in slick conditions. Harris has handled bad weather just fine throughout his career.

    That gap in average per carry mostly comes from third downs.
     
  21. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,425
    9,677
    Oct 16, 2011
    You’re a riot, 1 game sample size :lolol:

    Right, because Najee never had any carries on 3rd down :rolleyes:
     
  22. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    24,877
    4,081
    Dec 18, 2016
    Warren got far more carries in passing situations, when there is more open room to run. A far larger percentage of Harris's carries on third down were in short yardage, which were going to negatively affect his average per carry. Come on, Blast. You know these things.
     
  23. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,425
    9,677
    Oct 16, 2011
    Because it’s a cop out. He has 346 career carries, you try to present that like he has 50 career carries.

    And how come every RB doesn’t have as high a ypc for that matter with the same amount of carries if it’s so easy.

    It’s a bs excuse to cover for Harris lack of success.
     
  24. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,425
    9,677
    Oct 16, 2011
    You mean his 11 carries on 3rd down? Those far more attempts than his 69 first down carries?
     
  25. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    24,877
    4,081
    Dec 18, 2016
    You know there are passing situations on first and second downs sometimes, too, right?
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!