1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

This soap opera could end up as a shotgun marriage…

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Quadrupleyoi, Mar 13, 2025 at 10:15 AM.

  1. Quadrupleyoi

    Quadrupleyoi Well-Known Member

    1,206
    513
    Dec 23, 2017
    Between the Steelers and Russell Wilson. I don’t think he particularly wants to reup with Steelers but no one else seems to want him. The Steelers don’t seem to much want him either but there is not much of an alternative.
    Having Russ back is not the worst thing. It depends on which Russ you get: the one from the first few games or the one from the last five.
    I don’t think the first choice of either would be going to the Giants. An old QB taking the reins of a 3-14 team would be a mess.
     
  2. Da Stellars

    Da Stellars Well-Known Member

    8,288
    1,091
    Oct 22, 2011
    I don't know what Wilson looks like next year given his age, but I think he could have played better last year with a legit #2 WR and a better offensive line.

    Offensive line was absolute trash down the stretch.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Winner Winner x 2
  3. Lambert

    Lambert Well-Known Member

    3,457
    872
    Jun 5, 2015
    If you want 10-7 and a playoff blowout, he's your man.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 2
  4. strummerfan

    strummerfan Well-Known Member

    17,560
    3,520
    May 9, 2012
    It’s going to get to the point any viable option will be able to absolutely screw the Steelers. Oh I’m your only option left? Sucks for you. I want x for y years 100% fully guaranteed.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    24,858
    4,080
    Dec 18, 2016
    Yup. That's what Khan gets for trying to lowball the guys he wanted, Fields and Darnold.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    24,858
    4,080
    Dec 18, 2016
    What makes you think it will be better in 2025? Maybe the three rookies develop enough to make that happen, but they still have a very inexperienced line with minimal depth.
     
  7. CK 13

    CK 13 Well-Known Member

    11,904
    2,940
    Nov 5, 2011
    Well statis quo then and it will make all the Magoos happy. Yet their is no guarantee he would drive a 10-7 season or getting into the shelling I mean playoffs. Their is no alternative selection that would make a difference.

    Personally I want to see a down year 6-11/7-10 for better position in next years draft even if they draft a QB this season.

    Draft Dart and start the process. Although i'm not confident Smith or Bags Tomlin moving out of the archaic scheme to enhance a rookie QB. To much living in their fears. Plus Smith is just another puppet. We know who pulls the strings and they are majorly frayed and flawed.

    Buckle up...
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. Karl

    Karl Well-Known Member

    2,191
    1,449
    Jan 19, 2022
    There's an article, it talks up Omar as if he's some sort of genius.
    The premise is that he's letting players walk and collecting comp picks for next year to make a run at one of the QBs.
    It even suggests they move up as high as #4 I believe.

    I have a very hard time with equating anyone with the word 'genius' that at this point in the season that doesn't have an answer other than 41-yeard old QB's.
    If Rogers retires or goes to New York or Minnesota, we're screwed.
    Gardner Minshew anyone?
    Trey Lance?
    He hasn't even found a backup.
    We do have Skylar Thompson.

    It's going to take a 'genius' to come out of this messing smelling like roses.
    The best scenario to me is getting Rogers and drafting Dart.
    But maybe he has a different plan.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,408
    9,670
    Oct 16, 2011
    I get what you are saying but I think people are forgetting what was available for him in the shopping isle.

    Yes, I liked Darnold but he was far from a sure thing. Fields? I like him more than most and felt he was a long shot.

    So Khan is being dumped on for really going after the QB that gives them the best shot. Thats how sh**ty the food was in that isle.
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  10. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    24,858
    4,080
    Dec 18, 2016
    Darnold's contract was affordable. The Steelers offered better receivers and had more cap room and they let the Seahawks outbid them. At this point, he is a better option than Rodgers, who might end up costing as much or more.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. Lambert

    Lambert Well-Known Member

    3,457
    872
    Jun 5, 2015
    As always, we don't know if it's Omar, Mike or just the general idiocy of Art screwing things up right now but it's hard to see this working out. If Dart is the long term answer, then by all means draft him and look to the future. If they take him and he's not it, and with their refusal to partake in FA, they won't actually address the massive holes at DL or CB, and required depth all over, until the 3rd round. So not only will this season suck but they'd be in more trouble going forward.

    How they managed to take a decent roster, a full load of picks and more cap $ than we've ever had, and turn it into this mess is ridiculous. Then add questions as to whether Pickens is staying. The cherry on top is going to be the massive TJ overpay. All you can do is hope the guy after Deuce isn't a moron, too.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. Karl

    Karl Well-Known Member

    2,191
    1,449
    Jan 19, 2022
    I feel like 'The Steelers' have punted this situation for about 4 years really.
    Omar just isn't a strong GM, I think that is just the basic fact.
    I feel like using last as an example. They should have really gone with an either/or scenario with Wilson/Fields.
    Fields being the young guy, they should have stuck with as the starter and drafted Bo Nix or Joe Milton (both obtainable)

    So, getting into a food line and shopping for crappy food is a little of their own doing.
    Shame on them for shuffling their feet to the food line. :)
    I'm not at all impressed with our GM.... unless he pulls off something crazy good. I've had crow before.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  13. Michael E

    Michael E Well-Known Member

    526
    133
    Mar 2, 2022

    Yep, Khan is doing the right things. Just because we're starved for a stud QB (along with 15 other teams) doesn't mean you throw silly-money at a possible flash-in-the-pan Darnold who stunk for 4 years or Fields who wasn't any better, but at least could offer up a few highlight scrambles/runs a year.

    I'd rather (now with Rudolph signed cheaply) run out Rudolph and rookie QB backup than over pay some retread (Rodgers is better than Russ or Fields or xxx even at 41, so okay if we gave him a bit too much with an out after year 1).

    In fact, this might force them to draft a QB or trade back in round 1 and pick up an exter pick that would allow them to draft QB4 or 5 or 6.

    Seems like DL is the must draft in round 1, but trading down, kicking in a 6th rd'r and adding another 3rd or something might be wise.
     
  14. Michael E

    Michael E Well-Known Member

    526
    133
    Mar 2, 2022
    As for Rodgers and this "hostage" crap, give the man a break. He may have to decide between Giants and Steelers and pros and cons for each.
    It's not an "easy" decision. It's his right to think it over and if Steelers or Giants don't like it, then they can move on.

    I heard he has a home in NY? See him on Cali beach, so maybe he has two homes? Regardless, a couple of pros for the Giants and by all accounts he likes Tomlin, and probably knows a slightly better shot at an unexpected Super Bowl run with the Steelers than the Giants. Not an easy decision at all.

    I still believe, Rodgers is the one QB (available) to give us an outside shot at a SB run or at least a playoff victory. He still has the talent, albeit diminished from his 30 year old heydays.
     
  15. Da Stellars

    Da Stellars Well-Known Member

    8,288
    1,091
    Oct 22, 2011
    Yeah, if they can't fix the line Wilson will get killed...that is why, even though I don't like Fields, we should have sign him instead.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. Karl

    Karl Well-Known Member

    2,191
    1,449
    Jan 19, 2022
    In Washington there was a crappy owner, so they do exist. One of the worst owners is the clown that owns the Pirates.
    Owners are tough to remove.

    I've always been aligned with the GM operating with control of team.
    He has to have a coach he blends well with and they share the same vision.
    It may well be Art is just refereeing a struggle between Tomlin and Omar although I've never been led to believe that.
    In any case, it is a mess. I am wondering if DK even asked "Who's your QB?" before being traded.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  17. Mashburn

    Mashburn Well-Known Member

    4,406
    1,255
    Apr 30, 2021
    Who's the man to win a post season?
     
  18. strummerfan

    strummerfan Well-Known Member

    17,560
    3,520
    May 9, 2012
    We aren’t starved for a stud quarterback. We are starved for a quarterback. So you think signing Mr darkness retreat is okay since it would be for just one year. Apparently you fail to realize that puts us in the exact same position next year.
     
  19. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,408
    9,670
    Oct 16, 2011
    Rodgers has shown he is capable of leading a team to the SB. Darnold has not, but we did see him crumble in those last two games last season. So no, he isn’t the better option in the grand scheme of things.
     
  20. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,408
    9,670
    Oct 16, 2011
    They absolutely should draft a QB. Rodgers being the best option doesn’t mean he is a good option and at 41 years old may not even make it through the season.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  21. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    24,858
    4,080
    Dec 18, 2016
    If it was either Wilson or Fields, it would have been Wilson. They acquired him first. They only got Fields after trading Pickett. Fields was never the starter. He was filling in for an injured starter for six weeks, then returned to the bench when Wilson was ready.

    Nix wasn't available when they picked. The Broncos took him 12th overall. Were you saying they should have traded up to get him?

    They could have taken a shot on Milton, but that's far from a sure thing.

    They have done a poor job with all of this. I never wanted Wilson or Fields. They could have re-signed Rudolph and let him battle it out with Pickett last year, then moved on with someone like Darnold this year, but they mucked all that up.
     
  22. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    24,858
    4,080
    Dec 18, 2016
    I don't mind one in the middle rounds, but not in the first. They have too many other needs. I think Sanders and Dart belong in the second round, but teams will probably reach for them in the first.
     
  23. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    32,237
    7,878
    Nov 14, 2011
    What better option is out there?
     
  24. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    32,237
    7,878
    Nov 14, 2011
    Rodgers was young and in his prime when he went to the Super Bowl just like Russell Wilson.
     
  25. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,408
    9,670
    Oct 16, 2011
    Rodgers is still better than Wilson.

    I dont have faith that he will lead them there but compared to Darnold whom you didnt want, Rodgers is the only one to have done it out of the two.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!