1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Would You Draft a Running Back in Round 1?

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by TuRnDoWnForWaTT, Feb 10, 2025.

  1. forgotten1

    forgotten1 Well-Known Member

    7,548
    2,056
    Mar 4, 2022
  2. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    24,646
    4,060
    Dec 18, 2016
    That was going to be Bell's final season with the Steelers. Connor was a third-round pick who had barely played as a rookie. Chubb was a viable option, one the Steelers were foolish to miss out on so they could reach for Edmunds.
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  3. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    32,042
    7,854
    Nov 14, 2011
    I guess you forgot they were trying to sign Bell to a long term deal, they didn't know he was going to hold out for the entire season :rolleyes:.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    24,646
    4,060
    Dec 18, 2016
    Remember when Harris had to leave that game against the Bengals early? That was the perfect opportunity to let Warren play like a feature back. Warren got three carries in that game. Most of the early-down snaps that would normally go to Harris went to Patterson. There is plenty of evidence that you statement is false. None of it is more glaring than that game against the Bengals. If the Steelers felt so good about Warren as a No. 1 back, they would have used him like one in that game.
     
  5. Confluence

    Confluence Well-Known Member

    895
    301
    Jan 22, 2017
    Harris has a lot of strengths, durability and reliability being among those strengths, but we are going to draft a RB early this year, period. (imo) there are at least 4 backs in this draft I wld play over Harris, that wld match up better with Warren,

    Harris is a good player but when we draft a RB he will be traded, nothing against Harris, he had a good run with the Steelers
     
  6. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    7,445
    1,724
    Sep 9, 2013
    Bell would've been worth every penny of the deal he got. Bad advice cost that man his career. Sad to see. Was an amazing player.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,127
    9,590
    Oct 16, 2011
    Thats Smith. He took snaps away from Robinson and other playmakers in Atlanta.

    Pretty obvious they feel better with Warren over Harris but tell yourself whatever you like.
     
  8. jeh1856

    jeh1856 I am free

    30,821
    11,227
    Oct 26, 2011
    I’m not sure who you are quoting but there is more to the story on Najee and the 5th year than just the amount
     
  9. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,127
    9,590
    Oct 16, 2011
    He will probably be the lead back next year. You think they’d hand the job to a rookie.

    Free agency could change that but we will see.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    32,042
    7,854
    Nov 14, 2011
    This conversation had nothing to do with Najee and his 5th year option.
     
  11. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    32,042
    7,854
    Nov 14, 2011
    I think he will carry maybe 10 times a game and continue to be the 3rd down RB, it depends on which rookie they draft.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,127
    9,590
    Oct 16, 2011
    He wasn’t that with Harris he certainly won’t be that with a rookie.

    They will still do a RB by committee but he will move to the lead roll and get about 20 carries a game.

    Steelers aren’t interested in bell cows anymore. Harris took on a heavier workload last season due to Warren dealing with injuries otherwise it would have been the same split as 2023.
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  13. jeh1856

    jeh1856 I am free

    30,821
    11,227
    Oct 26, 2011
    So if you don’t know what you are quoting so be it

    Are you capable of clearing up your misleading comment

    Give it your best

    My comment I’ll stand by
     
  14. Confluence

    Confluence Well-Known Member

    895
    301
    Jan 22, 2017
    I dont know but the RBs on the board draft day would be to replace Harris not Warren. If we draft a RB in the first three rounds were looking at a feature back. Warren the elusive and quick #2, knows the system and can catch 10-15 carries per game
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    7,445
    1,724
    Sep 9, 2013
    You're right. He was never used as a "3rd down back". We preferred to give Harris a couple series and then Warren a series. They used both back (maddeningly sometimes) in all situations. Harris got about 18 touches a game and Warren got about 10.

    I'd imagine the split will depend on what type of back we draft. If we go with Jeanty, I'd imagine he would get the 18 and Warren would stay in a similar role. If they go with someone like Henderson, I could see a true 50/50 split. If we go later in the draft and take a day 3 back, then Warren slots in with that 18-20 touches and the other back will get 8-10.
     
  16. Thor

    Thor

    3,114
    1,223
    Mar 20, 2014
    I agree with your thoughts on Warren. Though I would argue that if a back emerged that showed plus production Tomlin would ride him more.

    The caveat to that is Smith. Tomlin's history has been to ride a back he likes; Smith was criticized in Atlanta for mixing things up and not centering more on his blue chips.
     
  17. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    24,646
    4,060
    Dec 18, 2016
    That is an interesting rhetorical technique. Ignore the evidence and keep repeating your position without supporting it at all. It's not effective, but it is interesting.

    They didn't just give Patterson a few snaps. They gave him Harris's snaps. They didn't trust Warren to handle a No. 1 back's workload. Also, if they had such faith in Warren, why didn't they ever start him over Harris? Harris had a few stinkers this season, some when Warren was healthy, but they never made the move. That tells you who they trusted more.

    They like Warren as a third-down back who gets some snaps on regular downs. They may try to keep him because he is much cheaper than Harris, but the available evidence contradicts your claim.
     
  18. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    24,646
    4,060
    Dec 18, 2016
    Harris took on a heavier workload than Warren when they were both healthy in 2023. The splits were even more dramatic in 2022, but that is somewhat misleading because Warren was a rookie trying to work his way into playing time and Harris was an established starter. This idea that Harris only got the ball more because Warren was hurt does not fif the evidence.
     
  19. Thor

    Thor

    3,114
    1,223
    Mar 20, 2014

    [​IMG]
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  20. Bubbahotep

    Bubbahotep Well-Known Member

    329
    71
    Mar 19, 2022
    Last I seen, Harris had two strengths you just listed. Still looking for the 'a lot'..... burst? no. speed? no. vision? nope. footwork? hell no. Wiggle? nada....

    help me out here with those other strengths
     
  21. Confluence

    Confluence Well-Known Member

    895
    301
    Jan 22, 2017
    Right, I get it (I was being kind), but it doesn't matter. We are drafting his replacement this year. My guess is we go RB second or third round (the class this year is that deep). For example, Judkins is projected to be a day 2 or day 3 pick so he might be available, along with others.
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2025 at 9:32 AM
  22. forgotten1

    forgotten1 Well-Known Member

    7,548
    2,056
    Mar 4, 2022
    Like I said, the Steelers did a good job selling a story and quite a few folks here were suckered into believing it
     
  23. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    32,042
    7,854
    Nov 14, 2011
    It's not my fault you have the person I was quoting on ignore and can't keep up with the conversation :shrug:.
     
  24. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    32,042
    7,854
    Nov 14, 2011
    I don't see Warren getting 20 carries a game he hasn't shown he can carry that load.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  25. Thor

    Thor

    3,114
    1,223
    Mar 20, 2014
    [​IMG]
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!