1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Only 2 run for Warren vs Falcons

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Steelersfan43, Sep 9, 2024.

  1. Steelersfan43

    Steelersfan43 Well-Known Member

    6,921
    2,475
    Aug 10, 2016
    Patterson had more run...I hope it will not be the norm and it was because he was not at 100% yet and the steelers were just cautious....
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. thorn058

    thorn058 Well-Known Member

    16,460
    4,325
    Oct 19, 2011
    The one successful run he had when he was giving Harris a breather after a tough run that I believe was called back on a penalty I saw him walk back to lineup and his walk seemed off. Don't know how to describe it other than like he was favoring a sore foot or leg. He looked like me when my back is just ever so slightly out and pinches a nerve down my left leg to my foot and feel hobbled.

    I don't think he is at 100% and might have rushed back out of some misplaced fear.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  3. Jball

    Jball Well-Known Member

    4,123
    879
    Jan 1, 2012
    Yeah, not a great day. Three RB's combined for 90 yards rushing on 26 carries. And 3 receptions for 20 yards.

    I wasn't too impressed with this new offense. This looked like more of the same; a couple of jump balls to George, and not much else. Even with his 57 yards rushing, Fields barely broke 200 yards of offense. They didn't crack the red zone till 8 minutes left in the GAME. At least we got a couple plays with some run-action.

    It was precisely, to a supernatural level, what I expected to see. The Steelers have become so predictable that I didn't even need to watch the game.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. bradshaw12

    bradshaw12 Well-Known Member

    528
    104
    Sep 9, 2018
    It seems like we hire 20th century OC's in the 21st century. I just don't get it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. mikeyg

    mikeyg Well-Known Member

    5,562
    1,206
    Dec 23, 2020
    i would not even have dressed him

    LET THAT HAMMY HEAL!
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. Tweezer

    Tweezer Well-Known Member

    398
    114
    Dec 9, 2020
    I'd like to see more creativity and flow as well. But, Falcons defense is pretty decent. On the road with Fields in his first game as a Steelers it's not very surprising that they went with a conservative game plan. Maybe they would open it up more for Russ? I honestly prefer a conservative game plan using Fields athleticism over potentially seeing Wilson get sacked 9 times. I think Wilson deserves a shot, but nice to have an athlete back there while this offensive line tries to gel.
     
  7. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    36,011
    9,406
    Dec 23, 2020
    All I can say is I hope Warren heals up, and I Love the Guy, but this is what some tried saying when people were saying He should get more carries over Najee......that maybe....just maybe His body won't be able to handle it. That said.....I hope , and pray that He is completely healthy because they work very well together.
     
    • Agree Agree x 5
  8. We need a change

    We need a change Well-Known Member

    1,467
    249
    Oct 9, 2017
    Warren is coming off of a soft tissue injury, it’s common sense to ease him back in, it’s a long season. It felt like the hand offs to Harris were delayed or started too deep. He’s a quick hit quick to the line type back rather than a pitch back end arounder. Warren’s carries will pick up soon.
     
    • Like Like x 4
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. Mashburn

    Mashburn Well-Known Member

    4,349
    1,246
    Apr 30, 2021
    I know I'm not the only one who is not surprised with your crying.
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 2
  10. Jball

    Jball Well-Known Member

    4,123
    879
    Jan 1, 2012
    Pardon, crying? Is this not a discussion board? Feel free to use the ignore option, pal.

    Actually, you know what, you're right. Let's get some positivity going on this board. Let's get giddy! Indulge me if you would, tell us all the things that you loved about this new, awesome, super effective offense.

    I'll get some hot cocoa, cuddle up, and and read your observations with the same amount of wonder as when I read Lord of the Rings as a kid. I'm SURE that it will be overflowing with mystifying insight, and extremely positive commentary on the orgasmic glory that is this new offense.

    I can't wait to bath in the succulence of Mashburn fully flexing. Mashburn in god mode. I know you won't let us down and blow it off with a smart-ass comment. That would be disappointing.
     
  11. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    36,011
    9,406
    Dec 23, 2020
    My Friend....what did You actually expect coming from a OL with rookies, a brand new OC, and a Qb that has a 10 - 28 record in the NFL??? MY bad.... sorry He now has a 11 - 28 record.
     
  12. strummerfan

    strummerfan Well-Known Member

    17,422
    3,502
    May 9, 2012
    Let’s not forget he appears to have issues playing under center which significantly changes the run game and hinders the play action game.
     
    Last edited: Sep 9, 2024
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  13. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    36,011
    9,406
    Dec 23, 2020
    Exactly
     
  14. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    7,191
    1,677
    Sep 9, 2013
    He needs to be going north and south. These runs are "Warren" type runs... Ones where the back finds a hole and explodes through it. Najee is VERY clunky east to west, and is really only efficient AFTER he hits the second level. It just doesn't mesh well with Najee's style (and truly Najee Harris is just an early 2000's RB living in the mid 2020's). Remember the pitch that Warren housed last year for 74 yards in Cleveland? This is what we are looking for. Not Najee plodding down the line, taking a slight veer towards the line and grabbing us a weak yard or two...

    I agree that his snap count was effected by his injury. Glad we had him back, but no reason to rush him when our RB room is deep. He's going to have 12-15 carry games later in the season and we are going to need him healthy for it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    31,433
    7,770
    Nov 14, 2011
    And Najee still led the team in explosive running plays last season :shrug:.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  16. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    7,191
    1,677
    Sep 9, 2013
    He led the team in carries... so theoretically it would be a massive problem if he didn't, would it not?

    Najee had 8 rushes of 20+ yards on 255 carries and a long of 25. Warren had 6 on 149 and a long of 74(TD).

    I just don't understand all the Najee love when there was so much Terrell Edmunds hate. These are literally the same caliber dude. Good enough to be out there, easy to replace.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  17. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    31,433
    7,770
    Nov 14, 2011
    :facepalm:
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. mikeyg

    mikeyg Well-Known Member

    5,562
    1,206
    Dec 23, 2020

    it really is elementary, isn't it?

    maybe not, for some.

    let that hammy heal.
     
  19. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    24,501
    4,050
    Dec 18, 2016
    No, they are not the same guy. Harris is one of the top 10 running backs in the NFL. The numbers back that up. Edmunds was never anywhere near the top 10 safeties in the NFL. Harris has also come through with big plays with games on the line, even playoff spots on the line. Edmunds didn't do that.

    Warren also fumbled more while carrying the ball less. That matters, too.

    I like both backs. I would have preferred to have them both for this season and next, but if you are going to call on one of them to carry the load, Harris is the one who has proven he can do it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Winner Winner x 1
  20. mikeyg

    mikeyg Well-Known Member

    5,562
    1,206
    Dec 23, 2020
    I like them both too.

    Khan and Tomlin and Smith see it differently.

    We have them both this year.

    Next year is a change in backfield, most likely.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  21. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    24,501
    4,050
    Dec 18, 2016
    I still believe Khan is abandoning the good in pursuit of the perfect, which can be a mess when that pursuit fails. See the wide receiver group outside of Pickens this season.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  22. mikeyg

    mikeyg Well-Known Member

    5,562
    1,206
    Dec 23, 2020

    that WR group might be just fine, when we have a QB that can drop back and throw passes. jury still out.

    and Roman Wilson.

    sit tight there, Scribe, sit tight.

    young offense in many respects.

    was time for DJ to hit the road, and his replacement made an impact on Sunday - Nasty D, if you read the thread. Can't have it all.
     
  23. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    36,011
    9,406
    Dec 23, 2020
    LoL. Because We have eyes. You are comparing a guy that has had over a 1000 yards rushing in the last 3 year......remember before You say anything......that no other rb has......with a team that nobody respects the pass......You are comparing Him with a Guy that
    1. Got let go from the team that drafted Him number 1
    2. Has been cut by every team He has played with since......and drumroll....
    3. We picked on when we played Him......
    Now please make that comparison make sense.
     
  24. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    36,011
    9,406
    Dec 23, 2020
    Thank You
     
  25. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    24,501
    4,050
    Dec 18, 2016
    I don't expect an All Pro at every position. I do expect a viable starter. Right now they don't have that, which was a rare poor job by Khan. I think he believed he could find a competent replacement. He failed.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!