AB's six year run.(2013-2018)

He's one of a few compared to how many Wrs play every year...., but we could add Mike Evans on that list...He hasn't had a bad year yet, and He's played with great Qbs, and a bunch of not very good Qbs.

 

Jameis Winston was very good at making his receivers produce...His problem, he was all-time level bad at protecting the ball

 

He also played with Josh McCown, Mike Glennon, J. Winston, Ryan Fitzpatrick, Baker Mayfield, and Tom Brady, and has not had a bad season yet.

 

Many great receiver have been productive even when he didn't have a great QB...Justin Jefferson and Tyreek Hill(last 2 years) are examples

And we can't judge players on just one stat, otherwise we make a bad evaluation.I mean, in 2013 Jerricho Cotchery had more TDs than AB but only an idiot is going to say he was better than AB that year....Also AB had a career high in TDs in 2018 with 15 but that was the worst year for AB in the 2013 to 2018 period

He also has a different level of bad QB...Just looking at 2015, Vick was unable to produce with AB but Brown was good when it was Landry Jones since he wasn't afraid to attempt passes of more than 5 yards, which was a problem with Vick in 2015

 

Ryan Fitzpatrick was another who was in the same style of Winston but less worst in turnovers....For a receiver,I prefer QB like Fitzpatrick or Winston that a QB who can't throw past 5 yards.It kill the entire offense when this is the case

 

Still many of other wrs disappeared under their play, and play of others....hell OBJ practically was gone under Baker Mayfield... Yet Mike Evans has not had one bad year since he played in the NFL, no matter who the Qb, and he is what made dumb Gms actually think Johnny M could actually play Qb in the NFL. If it wasn’t for Mike Evans....Johnny money would have been called Johnny dummy in college.

 

OBJ has not been elite since his first 2 years in the NFL!

 

You are not wrong for Mike Evans,great career but many great receiver has been great to produce if the QB is not bad like the Cardinals were in the period between Warner and Palmer for Fitzgerald

 

Yet you spent what ???? 5 different replies try to say different. LoL

 

Exactly.

 

We both know that isn't going to happen, especially with your pathetic ad hominem arguments leading the way.

That post wasn't made in a vacuum. You have been pushing an ongoing argument to diminish the accomplishments of elite receivers by giving the credit for their success to their quarterbacks. Your post was part of that argument. If you wish to lie and say that there wasn't a larger implication to your post, that's on you, but I'm not buying it.

 

Beckham was always overrated due to the spectacular plays he could make.

 

Why don't you two just get married already??

 

So You admit that what I said then, and You quoted there was no lie, and You just wanted to argue. Enough said.

 

Care to try that again, but in more coherent English? I'm serious. What you wrote does not make sense.

The only mention of a lie in my post was you doing the lying. If you say that your post wasn't meant as part of your larger argument, I do believe that is a lie.

 

There is something seriously wrong with You. LoL. Again.....it's very simple.....with what started this whole thing on this thread....what You quoted that I said .....where was the lie. You can't find it.....You only want to argue, and so now as always.....You are attacking Me instead of what was said. LoL You're a funny guy, and we all know You aren't that guy you pretend to be .... so stop. LoL

 

Usually off seasons are boring... and I rarely visit the board. Not this year. It's been the most interesting off season since I've been a member.

 

I can't wait till the draft

 

I made this clear. The statistic you posted was part of your larger argument about receivers. It was obvious. If you deny it, which you seem to be doing, you are lying.

No, you don't know, but that rarely stops you.

 

LoL. So again everything in the comment I made that You quoted was facts, and You just wanted to argue. LoL

 

Those facts are part of a larger, ongoing argument. Are you really going to lie and claim that isn't true?

They also don't tell the full story, but I guess you don't mind being misleading.

 

So what You are saying is You are not arguing about what I said, but what was said years ago. LoL So there was no reason to take My comment, and quote it this time other than the need for You to have something to argue about. Just admit it. I keep bringing up the comment that You complained about, and You still can't show me the lie....You just keep going on about something that was said years ago, and that I didn't say now. Unlike you who is so stubborn that You can't....other people change their minds about things. So again what started this on this comment was correct, but You just wanted to argue. Sad little man

 

It wasn't years ago. You brought this back up recently on another thread.

Why would I admit things that are not true? You bring up old arguments often. You were doing it again and now you are playing games. That you can't even be honest about it now is what is truly sad.