1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

IF STEELERS GO FOR FIELDS

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Steelpens65, Feb 12, 2024.

  1. zcoop

    zcoop Well-Known Member

    2,187
    491
    Jan 17, 2018
    True, it's just talking heads speculating. KP is the Steelers' guy, they drafted him with a #1 pick and will not give up on him until he's given a shot with a real OC.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    42,500
    9,428
    Oct 16, 2011
    Perhaps but that’s nearly 400 yards, still doesnt support STDs argument.
     
  3. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    16,221
    4,705
    Nov 4, 2011
    I don’t have a twitter x account so I can’t see the predicted compensation. What is it?
     
  4. SteelerNole

    SteelerNole Well-Known Member

    1,438
    307
    Nov 24, 2019
    Seriously. Someone please tell me what the fascination with Fields is?
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. CK 13

    CK 13 Well-Known Member

    11,692
    2,896
    Nov 5, 2011
    What are you talking about?
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  6. strummerfan

    strummerfan Well-Known Member

    17,243
    3,465
    May 9, 2012
    I think watching bigk try and play pro quarterback has warped some brains in steeler nation
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  7. strummerfan

    strummerfan Well-Known Member

    17,243
    3,465
    May 9, 2012
    A 2024 2nd and 2025 5th is their guess
     
  8. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    16,221
    4,705
    Nov 4, 2011
    That’s still a pretty expensive lottery ticket. Especially when we factor in that we only get 1 season at a low cost, then have to either pay for his option year or let him be a UFA (and I think we’d need to make that option decision shortly after trading for him, before even seeing him play in the B&G). A big “no thanks” for me.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. strummerfan

    strummerfan Well-Known Member

    17,243
    3,465
    May 9, 2012
    Agreed. Couple that with 38 interceptions and 30 fumbles in 40 games and it’s a hard pass from me. Now if the bears want to cut him outright and the Steelers can sign him on the cheap as a project then maybe
     
  10. CK 13

    CK 13 Well-Known Member

    11,692
    2,896
    Nov 5, 2011
    This.

    Everyone at this point knows that the Bears want to move on from Fields and are going to draft a QB. So where is the leverage now? It sure isn't giving them a 2nd rounder. Unless someone thinks he is worth it. I don't. I can see the pick compensation fading in the rear view.
     
  11. Steelvision

    Steelvision Well-Known Member

    997
    260
    Jun 28, 2022
    No Fields, unless he comes cheap
     
  12. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    6,999
    1,640
    Sep 9, 2013
    Fields played one more game than Kenny, but he threw for 500 more yards and 10 more TD's. The WR's should be happy, I am certain they would welcome the change. We shouldn't have to run Fields as much too.
    I've never advocated to spend the first. Multiple posts in this thread I've stated as much. If its a second... I certainly entertain it. I'd rather spend a 2nd on a guy like Fields than spend multiple firsts, potentially more 2nd's/3rd's/etc. to roll the dice on another guy that's never played a snap in the NFL. "Can't miss" prospects miss all the time. There's probably a higher reward since a non-zero amount of first round QB's turn out to be superstars, but most of them are the same or worse than Fields. There are VERY few guys I'd give up that kind of capital for. The only guys I've ever advocated trading an entire draft like that for would have been CJ Stroud and Joe Burrow.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    6,999
    1,640
    Sep 9, 2013
    LOL "Cousins is great, but I'd take a Tom Brady over him any day".... yeah, no $h!t haha I'd take the best QB in the NFL too
     
  14. zcoop

    zcoop Well-Known Member

    2,187
    491
    Jan 17, 2018
    I don't think Fields will be with the Steelers but some of you citing ints doesn't make sense. He had less ints that the 2 SB team's QBs. And many of the playoff teams. That's a false argument to hyperbolize your point.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  15. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    6,999
    1,640
    Sep 9, 2013
    It isn't likely to cost a first round pick. That is their asking price. I could ask for 500k a year in an interview, but it doesn't mean anyone is willing to give it. Fields is a tradeable asset and if they go QB in the draft (they are) then they want to get SOMETHING for him instead of nothing. Unless there is a bidding war between multiple teams, they might not even get a second. They won't hold onto him as a back up and let him walk for nothing.

    And yeah, they placed a high priority on protecting the ball because Kenny isn't good enough to overcome turnovers. He can't score points... So they told him to just avoid turnovers and let the defense carry him (and they did). I dont buy that they placed such a high priority on not turning it over to the effect of stunting their talented young QB. They told him to not turn it over because when Kenny was given free reign and the offense was opened up, he flopped. They reeled him back in because he sucks. Not the other way around.
     
  16. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011
    Ever since we won the coin toss over the Bears enabling us to draft Terry Bradshaw in 1970, they’ve been trying to get even with us. :shrug:;):lolol:
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  17. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    30,872
    7,684
    Nov 14, 2011
    I could see the Bears taking a second round pick, along with some later round picks for Fields.
     
  18. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    30,872
    7,684
    Nov 14, 2011
    Some of us thought Trubisky could be a game manager for the Steelers, we all know how that worked out.
     
  19. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011
    At this point in their respective careers, Tannehill is NOT an upgrade over Mason.
     
  20. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    30,872
    7,684
    Nov 14, 2011
    Actually, we don't know what the Bears are asking for Fields, because they haven't said he's available for trade yet.
     
  21. jeh1856

    jeh1856 Happy Holidays Yinz Jagoffs

    29,749
    10,975
    Oct 26, 2011
    I assume this is an opinion that he would win the fair competition with Pickett

    He most certainly would not be handed the starting position
     
  22. Rel

    Rel Well-Known Member

    3,687
    754
    Dec 31, 2018
    I never said it needed to be Lamar Jackson.
     
  23. Brice

    Brice

    6,585
    1,867
    Jul 18, 2018
    Do you think it will be reported that Chicago has given permission to Fields and his agent to seek a trade?
     
  24. Brice

    Brice

    6,585
    1,867
    Jul 18, 2018
    LOL... I am sure it will be a fair and open competition, just like in 2022 when Mitch won the job. Rudolph may have looked the best in camp that year, but we were told that didn't count because he knew the playbook better than anyone else.
     
  25. jeh1856

    jeh1856 Happy Holidays Yinz Jagoffs

    29,749
    10,975
    Oct 26, 2011
    What does Little Old Lady have to do with this
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!