1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

New Sheriff in Town

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Blast Furnace, Apr 28, 2023.

  1. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    42,361
    9,379
    Oct 16, 2011


    I’m liking this new approach.

    Just look at how yesterday would have unfolded if Colbert was still here. They would have stayed put at 17 and Porter would be the pick.

    Now, for the record I liked Colbert and I very much want Porter but now there is a very strong chance they got their franchise LT for the next 10 years PLUS end up with Porter.

    Buckle up Steelers fans, could be a fun ride with Khan.
     
    • Like Like x 8
    • Agree Agree x 7
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  2. strummerfan

    strummerfan Well-Known Member

    16,817
    3,384
    May 9, 2012
    You don’t know that. It’s pure speculation on your part. Have you already forgotten about trading for Minkah?
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  3. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    42,361
    9,379
    Oct 16, 2011
    Believe what you want.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. strummerfan

    strummerfan Well-Known Member

    16,817
    3,384
    May 9, 2012
    It’s not about me believing what I want. It’s pure speculation by you stated as fact
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    42,361
    9,379
    Oct 16, 2011
    That bothers you does it?

    I look at the past and in the past Colbert far more often than not let the draft come to him.

    Tomlin right there just emphasized how aggressive Khan is. Colbert was rarely aggressive.

    I stand by what I said, draft would have unfolded that way.
     
    • Agree Agree x 6
    • Like Like x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. R2sojr

    R2sojr Well-Known Member

    645
    137
    Mar 9, 2018

    If we end up with Broderick and JPJ, I don’t care how the rest of the draft goes. That’s 2 day 1 starting dawgs.
     
    • Like Like x 4
    • Agree Agree x 3
  7. SteelReal

    SteelReal Well-Known Member

    1,708
    303
    Oct 1, 2020
    I might have considered moving up to get jalen Carter to be aggressive. If moving up to get Broderick Jones was aggressive then the same can be said about moving up to get Devin bush. DB unfortunately didn't work out and some might say it was more of a desperate move then an aggressive one, but nonetheless.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. KnoxVegasSteel

    KnoxVegasSteel Well-Known Member

    6,267
    1,719
    Oct 21, 2011
    I was shocked to see NE even negotiate with the Steelers trading the pick. I'm happy we got BJ but NE came out smelling like a rose getting an extra pick plus still getting Gonzalez.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Winner Winner x 1
  9. BURGH43STEL

    BURGH43STEL Well-Known Member

    2,691
    418
    Oct 23, 2011
    It's not a new approach. 2001 the Steelers made a trade with the Jets. The Steelers went from 16 to 19 and acquired later round picks from the Jets.

    The Steelers traded up to draft Troy. Just a few seasons ago they traded up for Bush.

    The Steelers made some later round draft moves over the years.

    I agree it's not standard for the Steelers to make those types of moves but it's not a new approach. The Steelers are just selective based on their evaluations of other teams or if a player will fall to them ect.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. GoldBurgh

    GoldBurgh Well-Known Member

    1,285
    462
    Dec 31, 2022
    I'd argue that moving up to take Carter would have been kind of depserate, not to mention a slap in Kenny's face. We made the perfect call and can STILL get JPJ and with a little luck JPJ and a third or fourth.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. Jball

    Jball Well-Known Member

    3,923
    835
    Jan 1, 2012
    Well, this whole offseason has felt different. All these "little" moves have, at least on paper, have made a huge difference overall.

    We have to wait and see, but just look at how different this years team will be to last years. It really is a very different team already. And we're not done yet boys.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  12. oldschool

    oldschool Well-Known Member

    2,468
    558
    Oct 19, 2011
    I have been thinking like this for a long time in my General Manager career.

    I would always be trying to create attractive packages with picks and sacrificial lamb players on the roster to move up.

    Package rounds 5,6,&7 with or without roster depth to move way up in the 4th or even possibly into the 3rd. Package 4 and 3 to move way up in the 3rd or into the second.

    I would bet the hit rate would be much better finding quality contributors.

    Give me 3-4 swings in higher valuable positions at day 1 and 2 than 6-8 picks in total from all three days. Sitting out day three would be fine. There are probably just as many un-drafted quality players in our history as there are guys picked in rounds 5, 6, and, 7.

    It’s not an earth scattering concept and probably been tried by some team with more frequency than others at some point. Then all the other teams rolled their eyes a laughed at said team “I don’t want your crumbs and scraps”.
     
  13. Vox Ferrum

    Vox Ferrum Well-Known Member

    6,441
    2,315
    Apr 22, 2019
    I was watching the draft unfold here, but also in a steeler YT channel with live chat. When Paris went many were complaining that Omar missed his chance, when the other two were taken Omar WTF you doing. So far he has shown shrewdness and professional patience in how he operates. Letting the board come to him, moving up at the right time with very little cost. Now let's see how that 32 pick develops, I have NP staying and picking JPjr, but if you can drop a few spots and get back in the middle rounds, that also is not a bad thing. Interesting to see how draft 'values' weigh against desire for that 32 pick, I do not necessarily expect a haul, but it could bring more than normal.
     
  14. mikeyg

    mikeyg Well-Known Member

    4,657
    1,041
    Dec 23, 2020
    Colbert was a problem for a number of years, but he was like the Pope, you could not say it
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  15. mikeyg

    mikeyg Well-Known Member

    4,657
    1,041
    Dec 23, 2020
    Screwing NYJ > Helping the Pitt Steelers
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  16. Vox Ferrum

    Vox Ferrum Well-Known Member

    6,441
    2,315
    Apr 22, 2019
    I think its being diligent in scouting, where your team is, and what you need. There have been times the Steelers have had 10 picks and it seems like many were throwaways, but some years teams get a huge haul in the mid rounds. And I agree with the UDA area, again scouting and building those relationships in advance as the scramble to sign them begins. If a guy is undrafted and sees he has a good chance to succeed, or at least be noticed you have a better chance to secure him.
     
  17. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    42,361
    9,379
    Oct 16, 2011
    It’s obvious Khan is more aggressive than Colbert. A few examples over the last 22 years isn’t proof of things remaining the same.

    It’s also obvious Colbert was content to let the draft come to him. There were times he stepped outside of that comfort zone but by no means was Colbert a mover and shaker in the draft.

    Only been 1 round, let’s see what else Khan has up his sleeve.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. Quadrupleyoi

    Quadrupleyoi Well-Known Member

    1,112
    477
    Dec 23, 2017
    E84B97F2-5C44-46A3-95CF-96A745E821C5.jpeg
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  19. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    34,222
    8,967
    Dec 23, 2020
    Why wouldn't they. They got the best CB in the draft, and our 4th round pick.
     
  20. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    42,361
    9,379
    Oct 16, 2011
    They were getting Gonzalez whether they traded with us or not. NE wouldn’t have traded with us if we were taking Gonzalez.

    There is also a report that Gonzalez fell out of favor with Tomlin after his pre draft visit, didn’t like the interview.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  21. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    34,222
    8,967
    Dec 23, 2020
    No ....I agree with You. We gave them their pick, and a 4th round on top. Not something I like to see.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  22. strummerfan

    strummerfan Well-Known Member

    16,817
    3,384
    May 9, 2012

    People can’t see the forest from the trees and forget their are two sides to every trade. You might want to trade up or down, but that doesn’t mean you have a trade partner. Nor does it mean what you’re being offered is worth making the trade.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  23. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    23,283
    3,881
    Dec 18, 2016
    I agree that the sum of the moves is a positive, though they still need to add help in the secondary.

    All of that said, the primary variable is still Pickett.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  24. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    42,361
    9,379
    Oct 16, 2011
    Ah, gotcha.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  25. Jball

    Jball Well-Known Member

    3,923
    835
    Jan 1, 2012
    You may be forgetting that one of the Jets biggest needs is OT. We HAD to jump them to get Jones, who they obviously coveted.

    Yes, it sucks that the Patriots got our 4th and the guy they were gonna take anyway. But, it was also a gamble on their part. Washington totally f***ed up and took a straw man at cb instead. He may end up being great, but he scares the hell out of me.

    Draft position is everything. Leverage is everything.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 2

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!