1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Steelers spoke with Chicago to move up

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Mashburn, Apr 11, 2023.

  1. hmmmmm

    hmmmmm Well-Known Member

    950
    154
    Dec 17, 2020
    Move up to draft a guy that has off the field issues? Hmmmmm
     
  2. CK 13

    CK 13 Well-Known Member

    11,453
    2,850
    Nov 5, 2011
    Agree. It shows they want an upgrade at left tackle and are not sold on Dan Moore as that answer. They were trolling around looking to add Orlando Brown Jr.

    I like Dan Moore but he is not the franchise player we need to protect Pickett for years to come. Their could be a possibility he can replace Chuks next season if released saving 8.750 mill and being the primary swing back up this season.

    Issue is the loss of picks probably both the 2nd rounders unless we give up a next season pick. Dangle Dotson out there as well. I do feel he will be moved hopefully for a 4th or 5th.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. oldschool

    oldschool Well-Known Member

    2,479
    568
    Oct 19, 2011
    Please stay away from Chicago. They want revenge and will ask for more than what’s actually deserved for this deal by conflating the Claypool misfire.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  4. GoldBurgh

    GoldBurgh Well-Known Member

    1,285
    462
    Dec 31, 2022
    Darnell Wright from Tenneessee visiting the Steelers today. Makes me think they will stay put at 17 and take Wright if they visit goes well. Problem, though, the Packers may take him at 15.
     
  5. Trafalgar

    Trafalgar Well-Known Member

    1,055
    192
    Sep 26, 2016

    Just another guesser.
     
  6. Trafalgar

    Trafalgar Well-Known Member

    1,055
    192
    Sep 26, 2016
    Or we could just bend them over again...

    ;)
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 2
    • Very Optimistic Very Optimistic x 1
  7. SteelersFan1234

    SteelersFan1234 Well-Known Member

    86
    24
    Dec 21, 2020
    I am ready for the draft to get here so the rumors can stop
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Very Optimistic Very Optimistic x 1
  8. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    23,522
    3,913
    Dec 18, 2016
    That would be a hell of an ugly turn if the top three cornerbacks and the top four tackles were all gone before they pick at #17.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  9. jeh1856

    jeh1856 Just chilling

    29,052
    10,743
    Oct 26, 2011
    The first mock draft I just saw had exactly that

    For what that is worth
     
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2023
    • Informative Informative x 1
  10. HeinzMustard

    HeinzMustard Well-Known Member

    11,341
    2,825
    Nov 18, 2015
    That's not gonna happen. It wouldn't surprise me if 4 QBs were taken before Steelers pick at #17.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  11. Mashburn

    Mashburn Well-Known Member

    4,195
    1,218
    Apr 30, 2021
    If so, then trade back
     
  12. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    6,545
    1,583
    Sep 9, 2013
    I’m not sure what the disconnect is? This has been explained to you enough times to wonder if you’re trolling me or not.

    Last year’s QB class was perceived as “weak” because each of the top prospects had glaring red flags.

    Pickett - hand size, one year wonder
    Ridder - Cincy competition, strange inconsistencies in accuracy, scheme/usage
    Howell - coming off a down year, height, one-read scheme
    Corral - size, injury, scheme/usage
    Willis - FCS, non-elite numbers, height, ability to read defense, scheme/usage

    There was also a strong crop of “lower tier” QB free agents that were available, so teams went out and signed the Wentz, Ryan, Mariota, Trubisky, Dalton, Mayfield, and felt like they didn’t have to prioritize the QB class in 2022. This meant that there were maybe only a team or two ahead of us that was actually considering a QB.

    While Stroud and Young have their own negative perceptions, they are viewed as much higher rated prospects than the 2022 crew. It doesn’t mean they will end up being better, but that they are valued much higher initially. Some years are just different than others. I’m not sure why one specific anomaly year has made you question the position in its entirety on future draft days.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  13. jeh1856

    jeh1856 Just chilling

    29,052
    10,743
    Oct 26, 2011
    All of those scenarios are possible before we pick
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    6,545
    1,583
    Sep 9, 2013
    They might want that, but it doesn’t mean we have to give it up. We can have discussions as long as we stand firm on our boundaries.

    They signed off on the Claypool deal too. We didn’t force them to do it… just because it hasn’t worked out for them like they wanted doesn’t mean they specifically have it out for us. They (and all the other teams in the NFL) are trying to fleece the other team in EVERY deal. They want maximum value received for minimum assets given. I wouldn’t stray away from talking to them because of this.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  15. mikeyg

    mikeyg Well-Known Member

    4,729
    1,064
    Dec 23, 2020
    lets steal from them twice, they are not too smart!
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  16. METALMAN_68

    METALMAN_68 Well-Known Member

    4,664
    1,713
    Jan 4, 2022
    I'm confused. Did I miss the draft and the Steelers traded up?
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  17. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    34,597
    9,073
    Dec 23, 2020
    Yep ....just happened yesterday.
    Did You like our picks???
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  18. METALMAN_68

    METALMAN_68 Well-Known Member

    4,664
    1,713
    Jan 4, 2022
    Mostly, but a left handed long snapper concerns me a little.
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 3
  19. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    34,597
    9,073
    Dec 23, 2020
    LoL :lolol::thumbs_up:
    Just one more week, and We can put all of this guessing behind.
     
    • Very Optimistic Very Optimistic x 1
  20. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    23,522
    3,913
    Dec 18, 2016
    Wonder no more. That's exactly what was happening, though it wasn't just you.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  21. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011
    The barefoot kicker in the first round was what threw me for a loop.
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 2
  22. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    6,545
    1,583
    Sep 9, 2013
    finally lol
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  23. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    16,036
    4,619
    Nov 4, 2011
    That’s my 1st round fear, though for me it’s 3 tackles, not 4. I view Skowronski as a conversion to G, and we sure don’t need a logjam there while other positions lack talent and depth.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  24. CK 13

    CK 13 Well-Known Member

    11,453
    2,850
    Nov 5, 2011
    His biggest negative on his bio was his foot odor. Although Rex Ryan said he had no issue sucking his toes :hehehe:
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  25. Disco1981

    Disco1981 Well-Known Member

    5,508
    1,764
    Mar 20, 2017
    My " guess " would be IF...Jalen Carter is there at #9, and IF the Bears would trade it...The Steelers do it for Carter...

    * Could you imagine if this happened, and Carter turns out to be a Stud...

    Screwed them with Claypool...Then gave it to them again, With the pick they gave us for Claypool
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!