1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

CLAYPOOL TRADED TO BEARS

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by jrompola, Nov 1, 2022.

  1. TuRnDoWnForWaTT

    TuRnDoWnForWaTT Well-Known Member

    8,162
    3,193
    Jan 1, 2018
    If it was conditional we would end up owing them picks. Lol
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 5
  2. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    34,613
    9,076
    Dec 23, 2020
    LoL :lolol::roflmao:
     
  3. SteelerGlenn

    SteelerGlenn

    20,776
    4,590
    Nov 24, 2011
    Where are you getting 13 yards?
     
  4. Brice

    Brice

    6,445
    1,838
    Jul 18, 2018
    Oops, I had the wrong box score.
    upload_2022-11-27_18-53-24.png

    You are right it should have been 2 receptions for 51 yards today

    RECEIVING Rec Yds Avg Lng TD
    Chase Claypool 2 51 25.5 31 0
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Clive From PIT

    Clive From PIT I don't often drink...but I'm starting to. Site Admin

    3,104
    944
    Dec 14, 2015
    Who?
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 6
  6. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    14,986
    2,364
    Oct 26, 2011
    As of today, does that give us number 34 in draft?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. CK 13

    CK 13 Well-Known Member

    11,459
    2,851
    Nov 5, 2011
    31-10 bears loss yesterday was the only thing. What that former Steeler does is moot.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. jeh1856

    jeh1856 Just chilling

    29,064
    10,746
    Oct 26, 2011
    It’s inverse conditional

    The worse he does the better our pick gets
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. SteelerGlenn

    SteelerGlenn

    20,776
    4,590
    Nov 24, 2011
    I think his production helps decide if this was a good trade or not.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. jeh1856

    jeh1856 Just chilling

    29,064
    10,746
    Oct 26, 2011
    I wouldn’t argue box scores with Glemm

    Just saying ;)
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  11. SteelerGlenn

    SteelerGlenn

    20,776
    4,590
    Nov 24, 2011
    100%
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  12. hmmmmm

    hmmmmm Well-Known Member

    950
    154
    Dec 17, 2020
    102 but he fell down when he caught the ball.
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  13. Madmike77

    Madmike77 Well-Known Member

    565
    133
    Jan 2, 2019
    Claypool has almost hit 100 yards! In 4 games…
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 4
    • Informative Informative x 3
  14. troybellringer55

    troybellringer55 Well-Known Member

    6,220
    1,658
    Nov 17, 2011
    About the same production as he was getting with the Steelers...

    Keep on losing Chicago...
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  15. truckin9999

    truckin9999 Well-Known Member

    5,189
    1,052
    Oct 16, 2011
    Technically, the Steelers would have the 33rd pick. There are only 31 picks in the 1st round due to Miami forfeiting their 2023 1st round pick for a tampering violation.
     
    • Informative Informative x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  16. mikeyg

    mikeyg Well-Known Member

    4,759
    1,067
    Dec 23, 2020
    yep

    we WON that deal. CP sucks. i see big body WR's win all weekend long, he never wins. He is too soft, does not have a great vertical, won't be great in this league
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    30,082
    7,454
    Nov 14, 2011
    It's not like Diontae is lighting it up either.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. CK 13

    CK 13 Well-Known Member

    11,459
    2,851
    Nov 5, 2011
    But it was a good trade. A smart trade. I don't care if he lights up the night sky. This team needs an upgrade in crucial areas which this high 2nd pick hopefully will bring.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  19. SteelerGlenn

    SteelerGlenn

    20,776
    4,590
    Nov 24, 2011
    I agree. I liked the trade. We had his services for 2-1/2 years and are probably going to get a better pick in return. I know there were some that were against the trade. This just helps justify it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    34,613
    9,076
    Dec 23, 2020
    I was against it, but not for Claypool....everyone on here knows I've been complaining about Claypool since His 2nd season, but I was just worried for KP.
     
  21. SteelerGlenn

    SteelerGlenn

    20,776
    4,590
    Nov 24, 2011
    I can understand that, but he was a Rookie QB killer with those missed opportunities.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  22. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    16,038
    4,621
    Nov 4, 2011
    I felt really good about the trade when it happened. I feel even better now. Heck, I would have taken an early 3rd if that was the best we could have gotten.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  23. SteelerGlenn

    SteelerGlenn

    20,776
    4,590
    Nov 24, 2011
    Even before his lackluster production for the Bears this was a lopsided trade in our favor.
    I’m still trying to figure out what the Bears were thinking.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  24. Steelrules

    Steelrules Well-Known Member

    1,999
    633
    May 12, 2013
    They wanted to stick it to the Packers who were also pursuing Claypool. Rumor is they were offering a 2nd and a late round pick for CP. In retrospect, CP would be a better fit with the Packs than the Bears
     
    • Like Like x 1
  25. Lambert

    Lambert Well-Known Member

    3,327
    841
    Jun 5, 2015
    5-28 on 6 targets. Bears lose again... to the other team that wanted CC.
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 2
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!