1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Claypool on the block?

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Blast Furnace, Oct 19, 2022.

  1. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    23,536
    3,914
    Dec 18, 2016
    You have to wonder which NFL executive said such a thing. Omar Khan?

    This story stinks of BS as badly as the mystery MLB teams that are always supposedly bidding on Scott Boras's clients, but never actually getting them.
     
  2. Mashburn

    Mashburn Well-Known Member

    4,197
    1,218
    Apr 30, 2021
    Way better chance in the second.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Mashburn

    Mashburn Well-Known Member

    4,197
    1,218
    Apr 30, 2021
    Have to account for he has a rookie contract.
     
  4. SDOT

    SDOT Well-Known Member

    4,982
    684
    Aug 1, 2016
    GMdot right again…

     
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
  5. biggbunch68

    biggbunch68

    13,239
    2,271
    Apr 26, 2012
    The Steelers have already said they have no interest in trading CC, yet here yall are posting the same ole slop..
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  6. CK 13

    CK 13 Well-Known Member

    11,461
    2,851
    Nov 5, 2011
    Desperate times call for desperate measures

    If they offer up that deal I will help him pack his bags.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    14,988
    2,364
    Oct 26, 2011
    I hope all our players can give us consistent performances every week. there are professionals
    they get paid to do this.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. nor

    nor Well-Known Member

    701
    186
    Oct 26, 2016
    If another team had claypool, would you give a third to get him?
     
  9. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    23,536
    3,914
    Dec 18, 2016
    Kleiman is claiming and an anonymous NFL executive said it. For all we know, it was Omar Khan who said it, hoping some team would be stupid enough to pay that price. Don't get me wrong. I'd love if they could get that much for him, but you are making a false claim based on insufficient or nonexistent evidence. It's what you do.
     
  10. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    30,092
    7,457
    Nov 14, 2011
    Consider the source, fool :rolleyes:. Let me know when Schefter, Rapoport, or Fowler reports this to be true.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    30,092
    7,457
    Nov 14, 2011
    Yeah, you keep dreaming that some team will offer a second for Claypool :rolleyes:.
     
  12. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    30,092
    7,457
    Nov 14, 2011
    You also have to take into account he hasn't been as good the last season and a half :shrug:.
     
  13. Mashburn

    Mashburn Well-Known Member

    4,197
    1,218
    Apr 30, 2021
    Again. I'm not OK with giving up on a proven WR that is in a rookie contract. For a third that will be a project player.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  14. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    23,536
    3,914
    Dec 18, 2016
    I wouldn't do that now. If they lose the next two and are pretty much out of contention, I might consider it. I'd feel a hell of a lot better if it was more than just a three.
     
  15. nor

    nor Well-Known Member

    701
    186
    Oct 26, 2016
    Claypool is a body catcher and hasn’t improved since he went pro.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. DJ18Baller

    DJ18Baller Well-Known Member

    4,159
    871
    Dec 8, 2021
    If you can get a third you take it. This team isn’t going anywhere anytime soon and we need all the draft capital in this rebuild we can get.
     
  17. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    23,536
    3,914
    Dec 18, 2016
    I'm not sure that is the primary issue for him. I don't think he runs his routes very well, either.
     
  18. ljkjr74

    ljkjr74 Well-Known Member

    485
    138
    May 7, 2015
    This is what I read today from the Steelers Depot. How reliable it is I don’t know.


    There may be other teams interested in trading for WR Chase Claypool. But it takes two to tango, and according to the PPG’s Gerry Dulac, the Pittsburgh Steelers don’t want to dance. Dulac writes the team has no desire to move on from Claypool. saying:

    “The Steelers are not trying to trade Claypool or even looking to trade him. Not unless some team comes knocking on their door with a deal that is just too good to pass up. And that hasn’t happened.”

    Dulac also called the story nothing but a “juicy rumor.”

    Claypool’s name has been rumored in trade talks, some credible, some not, throughout the week, kicking off with ESPN’s Jeremy Fowler linking him to the Green Bay Packers earlier in the week.Claypool is coming off the best game of the season, maybe his best of the last two years, a seven catch, 96-yard, one-score performance in Sunday’s upset win over the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Pittsburgh seems more likely to try to build off that as opposed to boosting his trade value and shipping him to another team.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  19. biggbunch68

    biggbunch68

    13,239
    2,271
    Apr 26, 2012

    I posted this link earlier, and people just keep on posting abt trading him, LOL
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    34,656
    9,081
    Dec 23, 2020
    I agree with this.....most of the time. Hell I even have complained about it, but He made 2 huge hands catches in last weeks game.....So....Just maybe He is turning the corner. :shrug:
     
    • Like Like x 1
  21. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    30,092
    7,457
    Nov 14, 2011
    What exactly has Claypool proven? Other than that good rookie season :shrug:.
     
  22. SDOT

    SDOT Well-Known Member

    4,982
    684
    Aug 1, 2016
    If I’m the Packers looking at Rodgers window closing with no weapons. Hell yes I would. They don’t have time to draft and develop. Nobody is trading away WRs either.

    I disagree. Having him next year under rookie contract >>> 3rd round pick. I start considering it at a 2nd. Multiple 2nds and 4th or 1st? Bye Claypool.
     
  23. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    30,092
    7,457
    Nov 14, 2011
    Delusional, you give up that many picks for star receivers, not inconsistent guys like Claypool.
     
  24. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    23,536
    3,914
    Dec 18, 2016
    Apparently, there has been some talk of the Giants trading for Claypool. Their receiving corps is a disaster, so it would make some sense. I'm just not sure how much they would give up for the guy.
     
  25. SDOT

    SDOT Well-Known Member

    4,982
    684
    Aug 1, 2016
    I told you days before all the rumors I’d take nothing less than a 2nd. You said we could only get a 4th. Now all the rumors of 2nd or multiple 2nds. So you might be the delusional one :shrug:
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!